Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action - Research Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Fisher versus University of Texas case has been in the US Supreme Court lately over the admissions policy affirmative action issue of the University of Texas located at Austin (Raines, 2012). …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action"

Download file to see previous pages Abigail Fisher an undergraduate was the one who brought the case forward in the year 2008. She mandated that the court should either make the University’s admission policy inconsistent with or it should overrule the 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger case whereby the Supreme Court rules the issue of race did not have a role when it came to universities admission policy. Affirmative action policy related to admissions could be stopped by overruling of the Grutter v Bollinger case. Rachel Multer and Abigael Noel Fisher in the year 2008 were denied access to the University if Texas. Consequently, both women decided to file suit stating that they were denied admission simply because of their race. This was therefore a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause (Raines, 2012). The hard facts nevertheless show that it is not racial discrimination which is the big problem when it comes to higher education; it is the fact that poor students coming from any race do not have a high chance of enrolling into selective schools. Reason being if it is true that students full benefit from exposure to life experiences and views of a classmate’s selection that is diverse, then most likely they are not benefiting much from the most elite colleges in the nation. This paper will look into the conflict that exists in regard to affirmative action and legacy; focusing on the supreme courts decision that it will render in the Fisher v University of Texas case next year. ...
In 2003 the Supreme Court had to endorse a 5 to 4 vote in the Grutter v. Bollinger. Officials from the Texas University declared that the school had an affirmative action that was needed in order to build a student body that is diverse enough to be able to include students from the minority group and with a wide range of backgrounds and also the university to have a big number of minority students in numerous classrooms (Raines, 2012). Legal admissions can be described as a preference type issued by educational institutions to specific applicants mostly on the basis of the relationship the family has to the alumni in the particular institution (Nettle, 2012). This usually applies to college and university admission which is usually in American colleges and universities and started after the First World War primarily o respond to the immigrant influx. In some schools, legacy preferences impact on admissions that are comparable to other factors like affirmative action or recruited athlete. Affirmative action in the United States refers to measures of the Equal Opportunity Employment that federal subcontractors and contractors are legally required to take on. The measures are meant to prohibit discrimination against applicants usually on the basis of religion, sex or race (Raines, 2012). There are reports that showed that Asian-American students were the ones who benefitted most from California’s Proposition 209 that prohibited state entities from using affirmative action in the year 1996 (Nettle, 2012). Right after the implementation of the ban, the percentage of Asian Americans studying at University of California, Berkeley shot up from 37.3 percent in the year 1995 to 43.6 ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action Research Paper”, n.d.)
Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action Research Paper)
Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action Research Paper.
“Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
lily06 added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
This essay saved me today. I liked the structure. It was very useful for my law course.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action

...?Affirmative Action The principle of affirmative action Affirmative action (hereforth referred to as “AA is defined as “a set of practices undertaken by employers, university admission offices, and government agencies to go beyond nondiscrimination, with the goal of actively improving the economic status of minorities and women with regard to employment, education and business ownership and growth” (Holzer & Neumark, 469). The phrase “affirmative action” was introduced by Executive Order 10925. EO 10925 was issued by U.S. President John F. Kennedy in 1961, which urged employers to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Affirmative Action

...Bisping, T. (2000). Job queues, discrimination, and affirmative action. Economic Inquiry, 38 (1), 123–135. Clayton, S. (1992). Justice, gender. New York: University Press. Fischer, K. (2010). Advantages and controversy of U.S. "affirmative action" concerning african americans. New York: Grin Press. Lapenson, B. (2009). Affirmative action and the meanings of merit. New York: University Press. Platt, A. (1997). Endgame: The rise and fall of affirmative action in higher education. Social Justice, 24, 103-118. Sims, R. (2007). Human resource management: Contemporary issues,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Affirmative action

...Affirmative Action The concept of Affirmative Action is one that has been developed in order to address the inequalities that exist within society,so that all races and classes of people living within the United States can enjoy similar privileges at the workplace and in public places. Affirmative Action was a follow up to the Civil Rights Act that was formulated in response to the discrimination that was meted out to blacks, both in the workplace, at schools and in public places. The basic premise of Affirmative Action is that everyone is equal and that all races and classes have equal access to the resources of the country. Therefore, Affirmative Action is a move by Government to affirm and confirm the principles set out... in the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Dissertation

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether... (and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Affirmative Action

...recently, after being denied admission in 1996 to the University of Michigan’s law school, Barbara Grutter sued. The case went to the Supreme Court, and in its first ruling on affirmative action in twenty-five years, ruled 5-4 to uphold Michigan’s affirmative action policy and decided 6-3 against the undergraduate policy, ruling that it constituted the use of quotas ( This leaves a big question: “The colleges can still look for diversity in their entering classes, but the question is how do they look to that?" ( The courts left the acceptable means by which to promote racial...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Proposal

Affirmative Action

...:// (23 July 2009) Barnett, A. 1996 August, “A Case Against Affirmative Action”. Building Equal Opportunity On Firmer Footing. 23 (4), (online) Available HTTP (23 July 2009) Dietz-Uhler, B., Murrell, A.J. 1998, Evaluations of Affirmative Action Applicants: Perceived Fairness, Human Capital, or Social Identity? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 38 (11-12), 933. Horne, G. Reversing Discrimination: The Case for Affirmative Action. International Publishers, 2002. Kamalu, J.A., Kamalu, N.C. From Bakke to Grutter: The...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Affirmative Action

...Affirmative Action Programs Discrimination in the labor force is unfortunately much more prevalent than most people think. Job discrimination means that certain groups of individuals face barriers, both hidden and overt, to their active participation and inclusion in an employment setting. Insidious yet pervasive, job discrimination affects all types of people but is particularly harmful to certain group of individuals. Accordingly, women, people with disabilities as well as people who are older face a variety of impediments to their full participation in the labor force in this country. The following will explore job discrimination with an eye to how this form of discrimination affects certain groups...
3 Pages(750 words)Term Paper


...FISHER v. OF TEXAS The case number 09-50822 by the Fisher v. of Texas (UT) startedin the year 2008 (Kent College of Law 2010). The case background is in reference to the U.S laws on the clause of Fourteen Amendment, which relates to the State’s institutes of higher learning. The law is to guarantee the same opportunities to all the people in the country. This means that the law was to end racism. The contents discussed in this case are in the scope of the course and have a big role to play in society. Overview of the case In this case, the plaintiff s Abigail Fisher and Rachel Michalewicz and the accused party are the University of...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Supreme Court was executed as a way to prevent these American-Japanese from committing espionage during the war time. Korematsu who is the plaintiff saw the execution of the order as being unconstitutional and being in violation of the Fifth Amendment. He therefore refused to move and was arrested and convicted. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court which ruled strongly in favor of the presidential executive order insisting that the rights of the plaintiff were minimal and hence of no significant compared to the Americans in general (Alonso 52). Issue to be resolved The issue that was being resolved by the Supreme Court was on whether to affirm or duly...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...which include, keeping check and balances on the US executive government. The American constitution empower the supreme court to check and correct the president’s actions. The US Supreme Court is considered to be the most elitist and least democratic institution of the US government This is because it is led by learned judges who are appointed and not elected into their lifetime positions. The supreme court is considered to be the least democratic because the judges are expected to keep checks and balances on the political government, however their actions are not respected thus the debate on their...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Supreme Court/Fisher - University of Texas Affirmative Action for FREE!

Contact Us