Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In the article ‘The place of nonhumans in environmental issues’, Peter Singer opines that humans do not treat nonhuman beings equally though they evidently have the right to be treated equally. According to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer"

Aditya Santoso Philosophy – Ethics – Sara Rettus 2/6 ‘The Place of Nonhumans in Environmental Issues” In the article ‘The place of nonhumans in environmental issues’, Peter Singer opines that humans do not treat nonhuman beings equally though they evidently have the right to be treated equally. According to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and hence, they too have the right to get equality in moral consideration.
He says that when a ‘reservoir’ is constructed, though people express concern that it would drown a valley teeming with wildlife, the reason behind this concern often lies in the fact that the valley has value as a place for recreation like hunting, shooting, and bush walking.
In order to prove the hollowness of this ‘speciesism’, Singer provides the example of the history of slavery. The White slave owners never took the sufferings of the Black slaves into consideration because their moral concerns were limited to White people (135). Thus, according to him, if ‘racism’ is not moral, ‘speciesism’ too is immoral. Secondly, Singer opines that animals have interests because they have feelings like pain (135). Also, Singer points out animals have equal rights despite their lack of communication skills and intelligence because lunatics and infants too enjoy equal rights. The scholar says that equality in quality is not a necessary factor for giving moral value to nonhuman things. He claims that even within the human species, there is wide disparity in qualities like intelligence, physical strength, ability to communicate, and so on.
However, the problem with Singer’s opinion is that in his effort to protect animal rights, he forgot the fact that humans too are animals with the right to protect their own interests like all other animals do. It is for Singer to show a cow or a goat that tries to preserve some grass for another species before filling its own stomach. The mistake with Singer’s opinion is that he failed to acknowledge the fact that all advanced species take maximum advantage of the circumstances to promote their own welfare. Singer admits the fact that there are pests in nature. Then he has to admit that humans are just another group of pests that takes advantage of the suitable circumstances to grow. This is the law of nature.
Another vulnerability of his opinion is that he has mixed morality with nature. The mere fact is that morality is just a social construct which is purely aimed at human welfare. Moreover, the concept of morality, as he admits, is not concrete. It varies from time to time, and population to population. According to the science of evolution, humans have been eating meat since the very beginning of human evolution, and studies have not shown that human intestine is not suitable for meat.
Works Cited
Singer, Peter. “The Place of Non Humans in Environmental Issues”. Chapter six Animals, vegetarianism, and Environmental Ethics. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Philosophy - Animal Rights by Peter Singer Essay)
“Philosophy - Animal Rights by Peter Singer Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer

Singer on Animal Rights

...prominent human rights activists is Peter Singer who has an Australian origin. A renowned Philosopher and the professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, the sixty four (64) year old humanist has voiced his thoughts in favor of human rights for about four decades now. Peter Singer’s work “All Animals are Equal”, that came into print in the later part of the 1980s, highlights his decades old philosophy of safeguarding animal rights by voicing and maintaining the stance of respect of animals. This text is an attempt to voice Singer’s...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Peter Singer: Charity and Duty

...obligation. He argues that the affluent have a moral obligation to give money to alleviate starvation. Famine relief cannot be left to the impulses of charity or generosity. Singer urges governments, and individuals, including teachers and students of philosophy, to make this change in moral standards, and decisively contribute to famine relief. There can be no mitigating circumstances as excuses for inaction. The essay is a scathing indictment of contemporary consumerist society, which does not consider the prevention of death by starvation to be a moral obligation. Peter Singer’s essay calls for the adoption of a new moral standard which will “ensure that our lives,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Philosophy: Animal Rights

...). In addition, it is not right to use discriminatory terms such as species to treat human and animals differently. Cohen uses the term obligation to bring a different meaning to rights and duties, this is wrong because it is human duty to ensure the animals are healthy and are free from disasters such as hunger and diseases. Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher, bases his argument on utilitarianism which says that actions should purely be judged on their consequences. He argues that our moral concern should not make animals suffer. In his view, we should treat animals as if they are possessions. We...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine

...?Peter Singer and the Morality of Animal Rights This paper will look at Peter Singer’s moral equivalence argument in support of animal rights and draws from his article entitled “Famine, Affluence and Morality1” – demonstrating how the moral prescription underlined in his seminal work also make the case for the inescapability of human rights. The core thesis of Singer’s work is hinged on four suppositions: (1) "Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (2) "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Animal Rights

...justifiable way to eliminate from the moral consideration. It is the fundamental right and natural attitude to avoid pain or injury. According to Peter Singer, the non-human animals have the right to live in the society as they have several important contributions to the society (Preece 100). The domestic animals and other non-human animals have played important role in the development of society and community. The human beings of modern era should acknowledge and provide value towards the contributions of these non-human animals. These non-human animals have their own voice but they...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle

...that if it is within our capacity to help others we should do it, Bentham stresses on the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Both the viewpoints are related to the moral philosophy and aims at changing the moral framework of human beings. Both use utilitarian approaches. To explain this principle Bentham has used the example of a child and elaborated on how his mother brings him up while Singer has also used the analogy of a child, who is drowning. There have been a great number of objections of both the premises on logical grounds and the critics have felt in both the instances that it is not possible to attain the results that are being desired. One of the differences is that, the moral...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

Peter singer and john arthur contribute 15 GBP for the welfare of the famine victims, then there would be much better hope for survival. However, such an event does not happen at all and in fact other than oneself and a few other people, the rest of the people would not contribute at all. What is perhaps worst is that in such a case, there is no pressure on the non-contributors and they do not feel any guilt for not contributing at all. In such a case, the strict Utilitarian position thus becomes obligatory for all. V. What is Arthur’s thesis with regard to Singer’s thesis? Briefly explain what this means. Arthur (2008) has rebutted the philosophy and logic of Singer and argues that a person should have the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Peter Singer

...Peter Singer: On Euthanasia, Abortion, and Infanticide Life is one that is considered sacred. Human beings came to life so that they can serve their purpose. In life, not everything will turn out as expected. There are instances when something will eventually deviate and life, complicated as it is, may be disrupted. Peter Singer, the highly acclaimed philosopher and educator from Princeton University had been taking bullets for his much controversial stand regarding issues that are quite sensitive to the prickly society. He had authored several high- profile writings that had critics question his philosophy and morality. His moral and ethical perception...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Not defined,a proposal which combines IT and business together

6 Pages(1500 words)Research Proposal

Peter Singer. Moral Reasoning

... Peter Singer: Moral Reasoning The analysis of Peter Singer is an interesting comparative analysis of reasoning from different schools of moral thinking. The main thesis of Singer is therefore a critical examination of the moral reasoning based majorly on the utilitarian and deontological theories or moral reasoning. In the determination of the moral standards of policies, values, and other practices, the whole precepts of moral reasoning are applied. Focusing thinking into wrongs and rights make thinking very logical and moral. According to the Utilitarianism theory, a critical reasoning tend to benefit majority in the sense that a moral act in its right form will tend to promote happiness to as many people as possible. However... to the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer for FREE!

Contact Us