Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Briefing a case State v. Wells - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
She was subsequently convicted and sentenced. She appealed her sentence and conviction in the Court of Appeals for Green County,…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Briefing a case State v. Wells
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Briefing a case State v. Wells"

v. Wells Court of Appeals for Green County, Ohio. Legal History: The appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated vehicular homicide and vehicular assault in the Greene County Common Pleas Court. She was subsequently convicted and sentenced. She appealed her sentence and conviction in the Court of Appeals for Green County, Ohio.
Facts: On the facts of the case, the appellant was involved in a motor car accident after running a red light. As a result of the accident, one individual was killed and another injured. As a result the appellant was charged with one count of vehicular homicide and one count of vehicular assault. The appellant maintained her innocence, but believing that she would be convicted and sentenced harshly at a trial, she entered into plea negotiations and agreed to plead guilty provided the prosecution recommend a sentence of 8 years on the vehicular homicide count, and 4 years for the vehicular assault to run concurrently. The prosecution agreed and the appellant pleaded guilty (Alford pleas). The court accepted the prosecution’s recommendations for sentencing and the appellant was sentenced accordingly.
Legal Issues: The appellant raised two legal issues on appeal. First she contends that the trial court erred in failing to ascertain whether or not her Alford pleas were entered “freely and knowingly” pursuant to the US Supreme Court’s ruling in North Carolina v Alford (1971) 400 U.S. 25. Secondly, the appellant argued that her guilty pleas were not entered freely and knowingly because her attorney had not properly informed her of the legal consequences of the guilty pleas.
Holding: The appellate court dismissed the appeal on both grounds and affirmed the judgment of the lower court.
Reasoning: After reviewing the record of the proceedings in the lower court the appellate court determined that the court specifically inquired as to why the appellant was pleading guilty and not opting to go to trial. It was revealed that the appellant agreed that she felt she would be convicted despite her innocence and would receive a harsher sentence than the sentence she negotiated under the plea agreement. Thus, the court found that the necessary inquiries were made pursuant to the Alford case to ascertain that the appellant had freely and knowingly accepted a plea agreement. Therefore the first ground of appeal was dismissed on the merits. As to the second ground of appeal, the appellate court reasoned that there was no evidence on the record illustrating that the attorney did not properly inform the appellant of the legal consequences of Alford pleas. Relying on State v Cooperrider (1983) 4 Ohio St. 3d. 226, the appellate court reasoned that when an appellant relies on evidence that is not on the record, the proper course of action is for post-conviction relief and not by way of appeal. Thus the second ground was not properly argued and was therefore dismissed on procedural grounds. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Briefing a case State v. Wells Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Briefing a case State v. Wells Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Briefing a Case State V. Wells Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Briefing a Case State V. Wells Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Briefing a Case State V. Wells Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Briefing a case State v. Wells

Brief The Case Of State V. Stark

...Brief The Case Of State V. Stark History Calvin Stark was convicted within the Superior Court, Clallam County Washington, of two Counts of second-degree dishonor for intentionally disclosing his intimate partner to the HIV (Human Immunodeficiency virus), and he appealed. The Washington Court of Appeals asserted and remitted the case for commutation. Facts On March 25, 1988 Calvin Edward Stark hereafter “Defendant” was tested to be positive for HIV, which was substantiated by further testing initially on June 25 and then again on June 30, 1988. During the period from June 30, 1988 to October 3, 1989, the Clallam County Health Department’s staff met five...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Wells Cathedral

...Wells Cathedral Built in the 12th and 13th centuries, Wells Cathedral is known for its soaring arches and unusual interior design. This cathedral is one of my favorites because there is always something to see that one didn't see before. The senses are nearly overwhelmed at times here and it is easy to forget one even has a body composed of anything but eyes and ears. The site was founded as a church in about 705 A.D., and the beginning of the present cathedral originated under Bishop Reginald de Bohun, who died in 1191 (ed. David Nash Ford, 1924). The building of the present cathedral continued until 1239, under Bishop Jocelyn of Wells. The decoration of the West Front was completed in...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Case Briefing

18 Pages(4500 words)Essay

Love Brief case state v stark

...Case brief: Stark v. Stark Facts: In the year 1988 it comes to Stark’s knowledge that he is HIV positive. After confirmation of the disease he receives proper counseling and training as far as safe sex and managing his HIV was concerned. Despite numerous warnings Stark disregards the doctor’s orders, which was when he is left with no choice but to implement a “cease and desist order” authorized by RCW 70.24.024(3)(b). Even then Stark’s failure to comply resulted in his doctor reporting his actions to the County prosecutor’s office where he was then charged with three accounts of assault in 2nd degree under RCW 9A.36.021(1)(e). Proceeding: The proceeding can be correctly categorized into...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study


...1. MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 545 U.S. 913 (2005) 2. Facts: Grokster and StreamCast, the respondents of the case, distributed free software which would allow the users to share electronic files through peer-to-peer network. This software was used by the users to share music and video files that were copyrighted without authorisation. The respondents were sued by MGM for copyright infringements. It was alleged that the software was distributed intentionally by the respondents to allow users to share copyrighted works. Reproduction or distribution of copyrighted works in any form would be in violation with the copyright act. Hence, MGM sought damages while respondents claimed that they did not control or monitor the use... , the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Case Briefing

... Case briefings Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) Decided in 1969 In this case, three-law enforcement officers arrived at the home of Santa Anna in California equipped with an arrest warrant but lacked a search and seizure warrant. They asked petitioner’s wife if they enter the house and she allowed them in as they waited for the arrival of the petitioner. The police office had an arrest warrant to arrest the petitioner for robbery of a coin ship. When the petitioner arrived at his home and entered his house, the police officers served him with the arrest warrant and asked for permission to search his house. The petitioner refused but the police officer carried to search his house on the ground of the lawful arrest... and may search...
6 Pages(1500 words)Book Report/Review

Briefing a Case

...Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc Number Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc Facts This case involves an appellant who suffered injuries within the defendant’s premises as she was leaving at the end of a business session. The claimant was in company of an employee of the defendant who was carrying an umbrella with which they protected themselves from the rain. The claimant was walking ahead of the agent, thus her sight was not blocked by the agent from seeing her steps. She claimed that her injury from the fall was the result of a slip from an eight-inch kerb in the sidewalk for the guests. Procedure The case of Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc. was...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977)

...Case Study: Harris v. Jones [Coarse Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 In this case, the defendant was the supervisor of the plaintiff at the factory. The defendant was well aware of the fact that the plaintiff had a speech disorder that caused him to stumble. Due to this purpose, the defendant ridiculed the plaintiff in order to cause anguish. Because of this anguish, the plaintiff filed a case against the defendant for intentional infliction of emotional distress (Media Law Resource Centre, 2014). Facts: The defendant who was the supervisor of the plaintiff at an automobile company used to mimic him during work. The plaintiff asked him so...
1 Pages(250 words)Admission/Application Essay

O'Brien v. Ohio State University

...O'Brien v. Ohio State University 1. The Court of Claims judge in this case interpreted the facts in favor of O'Brien when the judge characterized the loan as given for humanitarian reasons and not given to gain an improper recruiting advantage. What facts might support a more sinister interpretation of the coach's conduct? In 2004, the Ohio State University officials fired then coach Jim O'Brien. The allegations on the basketball coach were that he broke the terms of his agreement. To assume a more sinister interpretation of O'Brien's conduct one needs to look into the reasons why the court decided in his favor in the first place. To be absolved in the eyes of the law, University had to prove that O'Brien's actions, which were... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Briefing a case---Near v. Minnesota

...Near v. Minnesota Near v. Minnesota  June 1931 The facts and historical/social context of the case: The Press published a story on assaults on local officials claiming that the police had links with the criminals. The Minnesota administration, therefore, made attempts to stop the Saturday Press from other publications under the state decrees (Near v. Minnesota). The state law argued that the Press caused nuisance through defamatory statements; thus, the abolishment of other publications and circulation to the public. Constitutional question(s) presented by the case: The Court had to decide if the authorizations to stop...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Briefing a case State v. Wells for FREE!

Contact Us