A topic from one of the four articles - Annotated Bibliography Example

Anna Lappé looks into the past of corporate renaming operations to realize the clear use of approaches that confound the community and immunize the industries at the start of legal attacks. Within the article, Anna Lappé refers to Philip Morris, a legal activist who was not simply exhausted with the old title of the corn syrup processing company the moment it spent millions of dollars attempting to retrofit its stand. Even though the company has been constantly associated with unselfishness, the company ought to process such foods under amplifying pressure from its rivals.

Habitual products have been compared with the operations of the organization. Anna Lappé uses tobacco to show the extent at which civic heath lawyers can go to tarnish the names of the companies. Another basis of the writer’s argument is behind the cause for the trade alliance pooling millions worth of funds into its messaging with the support of legal health publicists. Through the public advocates, Anna Lappé has managed to make the society question the fast foods addiction rate (Lappé, 2010).

The summer of 2002 saw the fling of three lawsuits against the QSR (Quick Service Restaurants), asserting that a variety of criteria of petitioners had suffered injuries caused by consuming “fast foods” (Davis, Driscoll and Schwartz 121). Plaintiff’s advocate and the concealed consumer counsel holding him up, and stated publicly that the lawsuits emerged from numerous similar tobacco proceedings strategies from the tobacco industry’s plaintiff. These lawsuits reflected suing strategies that were previously used by other counsels against cigarette manufacturing corporations.

The tobacco plaintiff’s bar has consistently attempted using such strategies to their advantage. Such a situation would be very difficult to come around. Advocate counsels trying to provide