This paper is based on a reading of one Federalist paper and one Anti-Federalist paper and subsequent analysis of the methods, motivations and arguments in the years 1797 to 1800 A.D. The objective of this paper is to understand the arguments of each side and synthesize the…
Download file to see previous pages...
The rationale that underpins his argument is that the present Federal Government has proved to be “inefficient” and hence it is time for the people to decide upon a new Constitution. Hamilton also argues though the arguments for a new Constitution are obvious and to repeat them would be “superfluous”, nonetheless he exhorts the people of New York to guard against malicious rumors against the same.
The following quote from the Federalist Paper underlines this aspect of Hamilton’s appeal to the people: “But the fact is, that we already hear it whispered in the private circles of those who oppose the new Constitution, that the thirteen States are of too great extent for any general system, and that we must of necessity resort to separate confederacies of distinct portions of the whole” (Hamilton, 1787). This is the same argument which was also built upon by the Anti-Federalists who pointed out on more than one occasion about the new Federal system being unwieldy and hence there is no need for a Federation per se.
The point here is both sides of the debate were arguing about the necessity or otherwise of the proposed Federation and they were motivated by a strong desire not to accept the new Federation (Anti-Federalists) and an equally strong desire to have the new Federation as a route to all around prosperity (Federalists). While the anti-Federalists warned about the concentration of power in the hands of a few, the Federalists proposed the formation of a new system that would be powerful enough to achieve their objectives of true Republican government.
The motivation of the Federalists is quite clear. They wanted a strong Federation that would balance the needs of the strong as well as the weak and protect the latter from excesses by the majority. However, the Anti-Federalists were quite adamant that such concentration of power would lead
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Federalist and Antifederalist Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1569241-federalist-and-antifederalist
(Federalist and Antifederalist Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Federalist and Antifederalist Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1569241-federalist-and-antifederalist.
The local politicians who feared of losing their power also joined the anti-federalists. “The arguments of anti-federalists relied on rhetoric of revolutionary war era which stressed on virtues of local rule and associated centralized power with a tyrannical monarch” (Constitution of the United Status-Federalists versus ant-federalists).
Introduction Federalist Papers are considered as the most important source of constitutional history of United States of America and outlined the basic principles based on which the foundations of US were built. Comprising of series of 85 articles, Federalist Papers were mostly published during the period of Oct 1787 & Aug 1788.
An emerging theme is the anti-federalists fears that the new constitution places too much power in the federal government and threatens to create civil unrest and division. The federalists take the position that the new constitution is necessary for averting civil unrest and division.
Although many of the constitutional amendments passes by the congress formed the bill of rights in the United States constitution, some were not very successful in the process. This was especially so in the year 1789 on June 8 when one Virginia 5th District congressional representative agitated the congress to consider passing the Bill of Rights as part of the initial reforms to the constitution of the United States (Vile, 2010).
Hamilton would serve in the Cabinet and become a major force in setting economic policy for the US (The Federalist Papers 1997). Federalist Paper No. 10 is an essay by James Madison and the tenth of the Federalist Papers, a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.
In addition, the papers pointed out the inherent flaws of a Democracy and warned against using its high ideals to achieve a goal the may be unattainable. The Federalist Papers argue for the implementation of the Constitutional form of government that we have today.
, capable of increasing by means of further associations, till they arrive at such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of the whole body” (www.intellectualtakeout.org, Founders).
It was in 1780s in colonial America when federalism developed a political
Madison (1787) is justified to argue that majority factions may oppress the minority for self-gain, prompting the necessity for a government to ensure fairness in a democratic society.
Madison argues that two strategies
In this Federalist Paper #10, Madison talked about the weakness presented by a faction in a government but also presented the strength of the solution. The weakness was the faction inherent in every government and the strength
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Federalist and Antifederalist for FREE!