Download file to see previous pages...
She faced a dilemma, outweighed her options, made a choice, and based it, solely, on her personal situation. She ended up not enriching her organization’s ethics.
On the other hand, her boss acted on his personal preference. He, too, faced a dilemma, made clearly unethical choice and kept acting on it. Therefore, he not only did not help develop ethics in his organization, he compromised its integrity.
In this particular case individual differences and preferences proved to be more important than ethics. Here, the ethical principles were not enforced from the leadership level, or followed by the individuals within the organization.
I see organizational ethics as a two way road. On the road, a car, driven by a manager, is heading to meet the other car, driven by an employee. The manager is supposed to give the employee a set of instructions how to deal with ethical questions. Unfortunately, in this case, they never meet.
In recent years, with the discovery of unethical business practices in several big and “prominent” companies, the public started looking more closely into how business is conducted. The focus of this new interest became the ethics in business organizations and how ethical guidelines are followed.
We perceive ethics as simply distinguishing right from wrong. On the organizational level this means treating employees and business partners fairly, and leaving no doubt or room for questions about implementation of organizational policies on ethics.
Many organizations do have policies and procedures in place to guide individuals in confronting and resolving ethical dilemmas. But, often times that is not enough. What is needed is overall organizational culture in which top management leadership, by clear example, leads everyone else within the organization in navigating the rough waters of ethics. After all, managers and other leaders are the ones facing dilemmas more frequently than
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
As such, it is assumed that the individuals who comprise an organization are reflections of a general group mentality; products of a uniform entity. This assumption is flagrantly false. The individuals who comprise an organization are unique individuals whose personal characteristics and attributes impact the ways in which they interact and impact an organization (Trevino, Weaver, & Reynolds, 2006, p.
This variation may also be evident according to the place and the culture that governs it. Other factors may also include the nature of the endeavor and what is most advantageous in accordance with the circumstances of the person or of the organization. In a capitalist point of view, what is right or what is moral is not often equated to what is profitable.
I regard ethics as the right behavior or attitude which must be displayed appropriately at the right time and right place because certain situations calls for various correct responses from the individuals concerned.
Morals are the Customs and Traditions accepted by an individual. On the other hand, Ethics define critical reflections on these morals under the light of right and wrong. However, ethical dilemmas do not necessarily imply a choice between a right and a wrong.
Ethics has been related to honesty, morality and fairness in personal and professional lives of the individual (Dimitriou et al, 2011). A widely accepted definition of business ethics does not exist but author Lewis defined business ethics as rules, standards, codes, or principles which provide guidelines for morally right behavior and truthfulness in specific situations (Dimitriou et al, 2011).
The acts driven by the categorical imperative are ethical, valuable and helps in the development of valuable moral values, law of conducts, duties, rights and other ethical values. The concerned are the rational human beings with equal amount of respect, quality and human rights.
Free will is not maligning other people for our sake. Free will is a matter of doing things right and doing right things in the matter what I believe is right. Free will can be equated to ethics. The human mind is an instrument of deep set of values and realizations.
had faced the critical incidental stress and was at the alarm stage where she was trying to decide whether she should complaint or should avoid in order for her personal interests. This paper is analysis of the situation and various factors related to the case.
9 August 2007, it is the fateful date when the devastating credit constraints hit the financial markets. The magnitude of the crisis was such that it threatened to hit the very fundamentals of capitalism in the developed economies, portending to gradually seep into the still opening developing economies as well.
However, ethical dilemmas do not necessarily imply a choice between a right and a wrong. On the contrary, ethical dilemmas are related to a comparison between two wrongs and one’s justification for the choice (Harry).
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic How Personal Can Ethics Get for FREE!