Download file to see previous pages...
quotes the words of Nietzsche: “He who has a Why to live for can bear almost any How.”(Foreword, ix) What he mentions in the book is no doubt important; but how he says, what he says is more important; about whom he says is still more important. He doesn’t tell the glorious stories of heroes and great men. He details the sufferings and mind-plays of the common folk, when imminent death challenged them; when they were face to face with the prospectus of death of the worst order. This book is considered as an important contribution to the psychiatric literature since Freud. Stories of other prisoners and prison staff are interwoven around the story of Frankl, about his imprisonment in Auschwitz and other concentration camps for a fairly long period of 5 years, and how he kept his inner spirit burning with the latent desire to live. In this aspect Frankl seems to surpass Freud, who propounds that sexual instincts and urges are the driving force in the life of a human being. Frankl thinks otherwise and argues about the nobler instincts that are more powerful. The core desire of a human being is to search for meaning and purpose of life. The worst was in store in the life of Frankl. Besides, Auschwitz, he had to go through the rigor of four different camps between 1942 and 1945. His parents, brother and pregnant wife perished. In a similar situation, an ordinary individual will develop suicidal tendencies, if not commit suicide. Frankl was a man of great grit and determination. Through his suffering he encourages others by arguing that one cannot avoid suffering when it has to come, when it falls in one’s lot, but it can be challenged, one can cope with it, find meaning and march forward in life with renewed determination. His theory is known as logotherapy. History produces stalwarts like Frankl whom it wants as the witness and to record its pages daubed in bloodshed and violence. To prove to humanity that brutal force will not produce anything durable!
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Technology: A Friend or Foe of Humanity
The precepts and concepts of knowledge areas have got significant boost through the advancement made in science and technology. Indeed, they have become highly important tools that have widened the scope of utilization of the existing resources.
Entities all over the world has come up with laws and regulations, and when one focuses on the countries constituted under European Union (EU), there are three distinct layers of human rights protections: the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and each countries’ own human rights law based on their national constitutions.
What makes one human?
The ancient humans walked and climbed trees. This flexibility aided them in adaptation to changing climates and to have diversity in their habitats. These people butchered animals many years ago. They also made spears that were used in hunting large animals.
In the excerpt that I studied for this essay, I came to realize that the Civil War wasn't simply about freeing the slaves, something much more was at stake. It made me stop and think. After days of contemplating and reflection, I realized, there were no easy answers to be had.
Some of the greatest philosophers of the past have talked about human existence and how a person’s sprit defines him or her. In this context the works of Aristotle can help in understanding the human while the
Yet both works demonstrate how the notion of humanity can be explained in an unexpected manner, often revealing itself in unexpected areas and ways.
Both the works portray one group of individuals as outcasts of society – in the case of “Merchant of Venice”, it
itment and selection process entails methods and procedures that ensure that only the best workforce is acquired by an organization and in a cost effective manner. The contributions the two make provide tremendous growth for an organization workforce and
Hurka’s suggests that perfectionism be an account of welfare because welfare is subjective. He emphasizes on those properties that are essential to humans and the relevant specification of the vital properties comes via an examination of what makes humans moral.
Up to now, art does not improve because people remain the same; they have the same hopes and fears as human beings, so art does not improve because humans have not improved in their innermost desires.
In a short paragraph explain:
There is also ongoing debate regarding various ethical considerations of organ transplantation all over the world. Almost all countries have some type of rules and regulations regarding the organ transplantation. Some of them are very stringent, which has been
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic What it means to be human for FREE!