Download file to see previous pages...
All states in United States of America have been granted freedom to choose whether to apply death penalty or not. In 1999, ninety-eight people were executed and about three thousand five hundred and sixty-five prisoners were on the death row in 2000. Death penalty is perceived differently by different members of the society. To some, capital punishment provides ultimate solution to reduce or eradicate the vice while to others, it is brutal and a disgrace to a civilized society. To understand the magnitude of death penalty, it is important to know the views of both the opponents and proponents of death penalty as a punishment to capital offenders.
First, supporters of death penalty argue that capital punishment is a sure way of eliminating worst criminals and making the society safe. This is because when capital offenders are removed from the face of the earth through a judicial process, they are stopped from committing further worst crimes. Worst criminals must be executed because they may commit the same worst crimes if released back to the society or escape from prisons walls. Furthermore, they may commit worst crimes in the prisons that host them. Therefore, terminating their existence through the judicial process is considered appropriate. Secondly, death penalty is considered retribution. The families and friends of victims of murder or rape may feel that justice has been delivered by executing the perpetrators that caused death or anguish to their loved ones. The perpetrators deserve death because it is a punishment proportional to committed offenses. Thirdly, death penalty acts as a strong deterrent to potentially worst criminals. This is true especially where execution is carried regularly and immediately. In Britain and United States of America, the rate of worst crimes such as murders reduced significantly when the death penalty was in force and regularly
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Some of the most civilized countries like United States advocate death penalty to hard core criminals for the protection of the lives of the innocent people even though trials leading to death penalty are the most expensive way of punishment. Being a Christian country, America cannot justify death penalty on moral grounds.
In the US, however, this primeval way of punishing criminals is still alive and kicking what with the majority of the states having retained the measure. Often, death penalty cases find their way into the halls of the US Supreme Court by invoking unconstitutionality as a ground, particularly the “cruel and unusual” punishment clause of the 8th Amendment.
Point 2: Aquinas's writings to this day are considered to be sound doctrine by many in the Catholic Church. Point 3: As the Catholic Church enters the twenty-first century, the debate over the death penalty is still active among many of its members Conclusion As it has happened throughout the history of the Catholic Church, the debate over the death penalty is still active.
Its controversial intensity can be predicted by the fact that whenever the words “death-penalty” rises, two different groups of people start debating between themselves. Extremism is observed in the views of both the groups. One group says determent, dissuasion, obviation and preclusion while other group says desertion ad surrender.
Worldwide View on the Death Penalty. Death penalty or capital punishment refers to a legal process where an individual is sentenced to death by the country as a reprimand for engaging in a criminal activity. The judicial verdict that an individual be penalized in this way is a death sentence, while the definite procedure of killing the individual is an execution.
Death penalty is a form of punishment that at the bottom line results to losing someone’s life. Thus, there is a prevailing assumption that the death penalty offers deterrence for murder and other capital crimes. To be sure of this claim, various studies provide the idea for policy making in the US in order to be certain whether it has a deterrent impact for murders and crimes.
A man, for instance, who has been adjudged guilty of murdering another man, will be sentenced to death. The manner of death is another issue altogether. Many imaginative and cruel ways of implementing the death penalty have been witnessed through time - from the guillotine to the garrote to firing squads to gas chambers to electric chairs -- before the more "humane" lethal injection has been made the manner of choice in countries that consider themselves civilized.
The concern that rises here is that why so many countries including the United States have swallowed the truth that long-term imprisonment is better than execution. However, there are nations that still believe the effectiveness
Can any procedure bring them back to life? Can any compensation make good the irreversible damage done to the immediate family members and the society at large? Does the Government have the divine powers to create life? So, it cannot exercise
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Anti Death Penalty for FREE!