Download file to see previous pages...
The quasi-contract in this case definitely means that there has been a contract which is implied. Jennings implied through his written letter that he was going to keep the car till October 9th if Wheeler wanted to purchase it.
The next question, since we have already established the fact that Jennings and Wheeler had a contract, is whether Jennings was in breach. We know that when someone is in breach of contract, basically they are not fulfilling their contractual obligations.
This means that Wheeler has the ability to legally sue Jennings on the grounds that he was in breach of contract. It is important to understand that, since Jennings sold the car without Wheeler’s permission, and since Jennings had given the first priority to Wheeler, technically he had automatically been in breach.
What is important to remember is that Jennings and Wheeler were in a quasi-contract, which means it was an implied contract. However, implied contracts are no less valid than explicit contracts. It was decided that Jennings was in breach, thus he could legally be sued by Wheeler if Wheeler desired to do
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The case in hand discusses a dispute between Indiana Department and Belterra Resort Indiana LLC pertaining to the imposition of a use Tax of $1,869,783 on capital contribution plus a penalty and interest for acquisition of a river boat from its parent company by the Indiana Department of Revenue (“In the Indiana Supreme Court…” 2).
Knarlesn is defamation. Knarles wants to cancel the agreement that Chetum made with Knarles’ son Barkley in his absence. He does this by telling Chetum that he will send him a check to cater for what he paid the maintenance company, and he will not even ask for payment for the job already done.
The size of market widened from national to international level due to large-scale production. It further brought development n Banking insurance, transport and communication.
As you know that the sole proprietorship form of business organization could not meet the growing needs of huge capital and managerial skills required for increased scale of production.
Dogood saved the life of Karl even though Karl suffered some minor problems. The doctor’s efforts need to be valued in that sense. At the same time, the doctor was culprit of taking risk upon the life of the patient. The doctor came to know about the malfunctioning of
If a contract containing an exclusion clause is freely negotiated and concluded, the courts may uphold the clause. This freedom between the parties to enter into bargain of their choice, free of interference from the courts symbolizes one of the basic
The plaintiff Mr. Tompkins, a citizen of Pennsylvania, complained in a Southern New York Federal court. His complain was that he had been injured by a passing train, while he was on his way home, after being dropped by his friend at
Karen claimed that Dean Witter had been issuing false information regarding the performance of the investments. When still a customer to Dean Witter, Howsam and Dean Witter had entered into an agreement
The killing of the suspected police informant is catastrophic to chances of Cary being bailed out.
Alicia does not admit that she is interested in vying for the state’s attorney. She denies it to a developer who shows