Download file to see previous pages...
The offer letter was also duly signed by Jennings, further confirming his intention to offer the car for sale to Wheeler. The offer letter, sent by any means like post or through personal delivery, was duly received by Wheeler and this fact is confirmed by his subsequent action, viz., to accept the offer and tendering the sale price of $13,500 on 29 September.
Thus Jennings’ letter of September 1 to Wheeler is a valid offer on the date of its acceptance by Wheeler. This offer was not withdrawn or amended by Jennings before Wheeler communicated his acceptance.
Wheeler responded to the offer letter by accepting it on 29 September and tendering the sale price. The date of acceptance is well within the validity period of the offer viz., October 9. However, it is seen that till September 15, there was no communication from Wheeler to Jennings and this period of silence can be construed as a fair and reasonable period of waiting for
Jennings to decide on his next course of action if he thought that Wheeler may not be interested in the offer. However, since no consideration was exchanged between the two parties, Jennings was free to revoke his offer at any time.
The options available for Jennings as on September 15 are a) to wait for Wheeler’s response till the expiry of the validity period of the offer or, b) to withdraw his offer (rescind or revoke) and to sell off the item to another person. Waiting for Wheeler’s response till October 9 would have given unilateral freedom of action to Jennings since the validity of the offer expires on that date. In case Jennings was in a position to make the sale by an earlier date, he could do so but he should have first withdrawn his offer to Wheeler on the grounds that a) he received no consideration and that b) he had waited for a reasonable time period viz. up to September 15 to hear Wheeler’s response. His action to dispose off the car without withdrawing the offer made to Wheeler
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Upon requesting Hill Bob to leave the land, Hill Bob stated that he had squatter's rights.
"Adverse possession is the taking of title to real estate by possessing it for a certain period of time. Title means ownership of real estate. The person claiming title to real estate by adverse possession must have actual possession of it that is open, notorious, exclusive and adverse to the claims of other persons to the title.
The increase in price is justified obviously because none of the hoteliers, except Brad, object to the price increase. The likelihood of any consumer backing off or refusing to pay the new rates is minimal because Port
o be considered as the first source of English Law because its decisions and case law conclusions are binding in all courts below it in the hierarchy (Kelley and Holmes, 1997). House of Lords is considered to be the last resort in the UK.
Kelley and Holmes (1997) argued that it
Gharar refers to uncertainty or a perilous condition that is illegal under Islamic law. As a result, no damages can be awarded for breach of a contract in which a party took risks. The law therefore limits damages by the extent of the taken risk
Upon notification by the waiter, the defendant paid in cash all the accrued debt and later on development of complication from the frustration, sued for damages and compensation. The card was to secure
The court is likely to dismiss Price’s claims because of various legal concepts that invalidate his contract with the parties and even undermine possible claim from their dealings in the drug. A contract is only valid if its
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Business Law for FREE!