Download file to see previous pages...
There are two aspects to consider when undertaking a study of the death penalty. The first aspect is whether or not the penalty is effective as a crime preventative measure. The second is whether or not the effectiveness of the prevention, no matter how effective it may or may not be, is worth the immorality of the taking of another’s life. The question relates to whether or not the right of the state to forfeit a life falls within the expectation of moral and ethical behavior that the worldwide community believes is fair and just. In considering the final nature of the death penalty and the lack of truly effective prevention from the threat of the death penalty, the forfeiture of life by the state does not seem to have merit.
World wide opinion on the use of the death penalty as an effective tool for the prevention of crime has been diminished over the last two decades. According to Amnesty International (2010), two-thirds of the countries of the world do not have the death penalty and of the 58 remaining countries, most do not use the death penalty although they have it as an option. The
United States, an economic and social leader in the world, still uses the death penalty as a punishment for crime. According to the American website Death Penalty Information Center (2010), 2009 saw 52 executions, all but one of which was done through lethal injection. Larry Bill Elliot was executed in the state of Virginia through the use of an electric chair.
It has only been in recent history within the United States that the death penalty for juveniles was abolished. A sum total of 228 juvenile offenders were sentenced for life ending measures between the years of 1973 and 2004 with 22 of those ending in executions and 134 received commuted sentences (Lawrence & Hemmens, 2008, p. 34). A United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Roper v Simmons abolished the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The positive and the negative incentives that drive the offenders into crime will also be taken into account. The final portion illustrates about spatial incidence of crime. Introduction The project discusses about the effectiveness of economics on social issues.
The author states that the economics of crime is the study of factors that cause crime and the consequences of criminal activities in the society as well as approaches towards the reduction of the criminal effects on the society. Economics of crime deals with the costs of criminal justice programs and policies and their benefits to the society.
Organized crime is seen as a firm when an internal structure of an organization is under investigation; it is seen as a government when its relationships with rival groups are to be investigated (Fiorentini & Peltzman,1995).When
e weighs the expected cost of committing the crime along with the probability of being caught multiplied by the sanction if caught, against the expected benefit (worth robbery of any valuable). (Becker, 1968)
An offender is aware of the fact that he would have to take costly
Population has a direct impact on crime rate and the occurrence of the same in the society. For instance Merlo (2003) attributes the drop in crime rate rates to factors such as the demographic factors and their occurrence in the society. They justify this by pointing out to the fact that the drop in crime rate in the 90’s is due to the growth of the police force by 35 percent something that led to a lot of arrests and rise in the number of prison inmates by 24 percent.
The advocates of legalization of marijuana argue that it has some medicinal value and effective in curing some diseases. However, those against the legalization of marijuana argue that it can fuel crime in the society. There are some people who believe that
On the other hand, terror is organized with the aim of seeking to overthrow the political status quo when all other actions of redressing injustices will not work. In many decades, war, crime and terror activities have been most pressing issues in the political economy.
As the study, Why People Choose a Life of Crime, stresses poor people find it difficult to pay their bills, fend for their daily needs, or own in a good house. Consequently, statistics show that there is a high crime rate in poor neighborhoods due to the poor social and economic environment in such neighborhoods.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The economics of Crime for FREE!