Download file to see previous pages...
One can say that barrister’s line of work does not involve management and administration of legal work related to personal or company clients. Their practice involves representing their clients in case in front of judge, and jury to advocate. The law society of England and Wales define barristers as legal professionals “who are instructed by the solicitors and have little or no legal contact with the client” (The-Law-Society, 2010)
Solicitors are also type of lawyers however their line of work is more related to work in Magistrates and County Courts. Advocacy is small part of their line of work and they are more involved in dealing with commercial and personal dealings that involve legal work, corporate matters, land, and other possessions work. The law society defines Solicitors as legal professionals “who advice on all kind of legal matters, from buying a home to selling of a corporation”(The-Law-Society, 2010)
There are many differences between solicitors and barristers; however at the same time it is hard to define them separately. Many times their professions cross line and overlap each other’s work. It can be said that barristers are types of lawyers who only represent their client in the courts or in front of jury; they are normally instructed by the solicitors rather than the client. Their line of work mostly involves advocacy. On the other hand Solicitors are the type of lawyers who can be involve in many legal aspects such as preparing a case, advising, drafting legal work, and basically doing daily management of a legal case. (David and Brierley, 1978) Other differences could be minor and can be as many as 7-10. For instance one of the differences is that a Barrister will have a specialized knowledge and practice of one aspect of legal system, and Solicitor’s practice will be more related to general knowledge of legal system. (Zander, 2007)
One easy way of defining these professions separately
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Upon requesting Hill Bob to leave the land, Hill Bob stated that he had squatter's rights.
"Adverse possession is the taking of title to real estate by possessing it for a certain period of time. Title means ownership of real estate. The person claiming title to real estate by adverse possession must have actual possession of it that is open, notorious, exclusive and adverse to the claims of other persons to the title.
The increase in price is justified obviously because none of the hoteliers, except Brad, object to the price increase. The likelihood of any consumer backing off or refusing to pay the new rates is minimal because Port
o be considered as the first source of English Law because its decisions and case law conclusions are binding in all courts below it in the hierarchy (Kelley and Holmes, 1997). House of Lords is considered to be the last resort in the UK.
Kelley and Holmes (1997) argued that it
Gharar refers to uncertainty or a perilous condition that is illegal under Islamic law. As a result, no damages can be awarded for breach of a contract in which a party took risks. The law therefore limits damages by the extent of the taken risk
Upon notification by the waiter, the defendant paid in cash all the accrued debt and later on development of complication from the frustration, sued for damages and compensation. The card was to secure
The court is likely to dismiss Price’s claims because of various legal concepts that invalidate his contract with the parties and even undermine possible claim from their dealings in the drug. A contract is only valid if its
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Business Law for FREE!