On 6 March 2010, police arrested Pornwat Thongsomboon (also known as K-Thong) on the charge of instigating unrest, after K-Thong posted a video online claiming that bomb attacks and violence would follow the seizure of Thaksin’s…
Download file to see previous pages...
Tensions seem to be on the rise, and democracy seems to be faltering in Thailand. Using this and any other examples from what we have covered of Southeast Asia so far, write an essay evaluating the changing experience of democracy in Southeast Asia. Where and when has democracy been at its strongest? Its weakest? How do you account for the success or failure of democratic governance in Southeast Asia? Is it really a question of stability versus freedom?
The type of governance of each state is usually depended on the local ethics and culture; however, it is quite possible that a country’s governance style is developed under the influence of specific economic and political interests. Democracy can be characterized as the most preferred style of governance – mainly due to the rights provided to the citizens. Democracy has been adopted by many states internationally; however, it could be supported that in most of these countries democracy is not fully developed. Different facts have played a role in the failure of democracy around the world. Current paper focuses on the characteristics and the performance of democracy in the Southeast Asia region. Thailand and Singapore are used as examples for highlighting the challenges for democracy in the international community. It is revealed that the development of democracy in Southeast Asia is quite problematic – there are many obstacles that need to be eliminated in order for democracy to succeed in the specific region.
The characteristics and the development of democracy in the Southeast region can be identified by referring to the practices used by the governors of the countries of this region in order to establish democracy or just to improve their countries’ existing political systems – an initiative that have prepared those countries’ political and social framework for democracy. At the next level, the existing styles of governance in these countries
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Even though constitutional revision has been a formal floorboard of the LDP platform since its establishment in 1955, and even if the party committees have generated recommendations for changing the constitution over the years, the LDP has never offered before the Japanese public an amendment proposal with full party backing.
Schelling, an author of Arms & influence, continually emphasizes the importance of expectations and perceptions between countries. His theory helps us to understand how nations tend to fulfill promises and to what extent they can be expected, because there is always a risk of a major war emerging from accidents of a diplomatic process of commitment, which is unpredictable.
On the other hand, China and North Korea still remain to be crass authoritarian as they are single party states favoring totalitarianism. Besides, Taiwan has not become enough democratic due to various reasons including the critical question of national sovereignty.
Comments were welcomed, as was presenting of further evidence to make changes in the proposal, and it was not considered final (“Evidence and Health Care Reform).
Of course, most of the parties involved, including health insurance companies, drug manufacturers,
The essay will discuss the effects that Senate reforms have had on minority groups, primarily focusing on research that has been conducted on the impact of Senate reforms on women and then using an analysis on Quebec to understand the importance of minority