Download file to see previous pages...
But he has neglected the aesthetic aspects of the treatment and thought that causing a burn to the patient is negligible as part of saving the life of the patient. In that sense the doctor was culprit of neglecting certain critical things in his profession. If the surgery was unavoidable at that juncture, probably the doctor’s actions could have been justified.
On the other hand, there are no such worries in declaring the ECR instrument manufacturer as the major culprit in this case. This manufacturer has sold defective products in the market which caused damages to the users. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to test the quality of the product fully before introducing it in to the market. He should ensure that his product may not cause any damages to the users. No product manufacturer has the right to sell defective products in the market. The specifications and usage instructions of the product should be given to the users by the manufacturer and the manufacturer is responsible for any malfunctioning of the product provided the users use it exactly as per the instructions given by the manufacturer through the product manual. So the manufacturer of the ECR instrument is 100% responsible for this crime and need to be compensated Karl for that.
Apart from the doctor and the ECR manufacturer, the hospital management is also responsible for Karl’s agony. The management purchased cheap quality products and took the risk of using it in the treatment of patients. It is the responsibility of the management to ensure the quality of the products they purchased before testing it on others. So, in my opinion, Karl can consider suing against the hospital management also.
Anaesthesiologist and the nurses have nothing to do with this case. The duty of the anaesthesiologist is confined to the anaesthesia alone. He has nothing to do with the usage of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The case in hand discusses a dispute between Indiana Department and Belterra Resort Indiana LLC pertaining to the imposition of a use Tax of $1,869,783 on capital contribution plus a penalty and interest for acquisition of a river boat from its parent company by the Indiana Department of Revenue (“In the Indiana Supreme Court…” 2).
Knarlesn is defamation. Knarles wants to cancel the agreement that Chetum made with Knarles’ son Barkley in his absence. He does this by telling Chetum that he will send him a check to cater for what he paid the maintenance company, and he will not even ask for payment for the job already done.
The size of market widened from national to international level due to large-scale production. It further brought development n Banking insurance, transport and communication.
As you know that the sole proprietorship form of business organization could not meet the growing needs of huge capital and managerial skills required for increased scale of production.
If a contract containing an exclusion clause is freely negotiated and concluded, the courts may uphold the clause. This freedom between the parties to enter into bargain of their choice, free of interference from the courts symbolizes one of the basic
“The term quasi-contract is a more accurate designation of contracts implied in law. Implied contracts are as binding as express contracts. An implied contract depends on substance for its existence; therefore, for
The plaintiff Mr. Tompkins, a citizen of Pennsylvania, complained in a Southern New York Federal court. His complain was that he had been injured by a passing train, while he was on his way home, after being dropped by his friend at
Karen claimed that Dean Witter had been issuing false information regarding the performance of the investments. When still a customer to Dean Witter, Howsam and Dean Witter had entered into an agreement
The killing of the suspected police informant is catastrophic to chances of Cary being bailed out.
Alicia does not admit that she is interested in vying for the state’s attorney. She denies it to a developer who shows