Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Why are similar independence claims the subject of different responses from the international community The international communitys position on Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia"
with a personal 20% discount.
Download file to see previous pages...
vestigation of the issues and facts that divide the international community in its responses to the secessions of Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia reveal that the legality of these secessions are not the only determining factors. A review of the literature seems to suggest that power politics has a role to play in the responses to these secessions. In other words, there is an emerging trend indicating that it is possible to conclude that world powers are more inclined to support or refuse to support an entity’s secession based on political rather than legal reasoning. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate that power politics permits what amounts to a spin on the international legal framework for statehood and state recognition.
The secessions of South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Kosovo will be compared and contrasted with a view to determining the way that the international community should have responded to these secessions and how they in fact, responded. It will be argued that from a purely legal perspective the secessions are no different from one another, and power politics plays a greater role in the international community’s responses than international customary law.
The 2008 declarations of independence by South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Kosovo was met by entirely different responses by the international community, specifically international organizations such as the United Nations (UN), the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Organizations for Security Cooperation with Europe (OSCE) .2 The CoE, the UN and the OSCE readily recognized Kosovo’s independence but at the same time did not accept and recognize the secession of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.3 The European Union (EU) which occupies a unique position in its relationship with Russia, was split on Kosovo’s independence and unquestionably unsupportive of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.4 NATO and the United States (US) accepted and recognized Kosovo’s independence but outright refused to accept
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Running head: KOSOVO INDEPENDENCE Kosovo Independence Insert Name Insert Grade Course Insert Tutor’s Name October 29, 2011 Kosovo Independence Introduction Edmund Burke conceived society as being made up of complex web-work of institutions that undergo continuous growth (Raeder 1).
Via compliance with obligations agreed upon, the nations aid in ensuring that the other states comply with their own. Aside from a mutual benefit, all nations have an interest in abiding by the law, especially in such areas as ocean and sea resources, as well as environmental protection.
This is because of the international conventions and regulations that bind various nations and spell out some accepted codes of existence.In most cases,when these codes are broken,leading to all kinds of humanitarian crisis in individual countries,the resultant consequence has been for the international world to intervene
Whereas Abkhazia has recently come to a high level of prominence as a result of the 2008 Russia-Georgia conflict, little if any mention or understanding of this particular region of the world had previously been engaged in. Yet, as has happened so many times throughout Eastern Europe’s long history, the power and force that a re-invigorated Russian Federation was able to exhibit profoundly and unalterably changed the way in which this particular state within a state had previously been defined; since the collapse of the former Soviet Union.
While China balances precariously between the free market and an edgy military regime, the nation is surfacing as a formidable contender in the economic sector and an impending challenger for technological advantage.
From the benchmark of Tiananmen Square in 1989 well into the first tender years of the twenty-first Century, many in the West continue to view China with unease and distrust.
wing to such conflict the Soviet Union is believed to have restrained the national and ethnic concerns and disparities of the people that further led to a suppression of their national identities. The causes of the conflict can be understood from political as well as ethnic
A new world order was sprouting up that would replace the Cold War with peace and stability. In his book “The End of History,” the political analyst Francis Fukuyama turned away from the philosophy of Hegel and ideological conflicts as the engine of history and
nitiative of Finland’s former President Martti Ahtisaari also called the Ahtisaari plan which stipulated UN’s supervised independence for Kosovo with the support of the European Union with the condition that Kosovo would obligate itself to protect its minorities’ right
One’s profession must be under ethical and moral obligations which must be adhered to.
These are trained and skilled individuals with
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Why are similar independence claims the subject of different responses from the international community The international communitys position on Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia for FREE!