Download file to see previous pages...
This essay argues that while both conflict and consensus are existent in the United States, the country tends towards the conflict perspective.
While both formulations of these perspectives are problematic, the consensus perspective has seemingly overly optimistic slant. In essence, it’s arguing that the law functions outside of undue influence, in a completely equitable means of agreed upon functions. It seems this view completely ignores things, such as the overwhelming privileged inherent in attending law school, or that becoming a judge requires significant political acumen. While it acknowledges that there are diverse and competing interests within a cultural framework, it assumes that the social structure exists outside of them, created through some metaphysical objectivity; this is logically inconsistent, as it fails to take into account that the very people who constructed the legal system were influenced by these same pernicious motivations. Even so, most citizens and scholars recognize some truth to the consensus model. While the Supreme Court structure in American society is understood to be highly reliant on the personal backgrounds of the individual justices, society has objectively accounted for this and openly negotiates how personal bias will be used towards equitable means. While this may be a highly reductionist take on the process of law, as a conflict argument would be that even the democratic voting process is indicative of oppressive power structures, in these instances there is at least the social movement towards equitable democratic consensus.
Conversely, the conflict paradigm aligns the social structure as a means for powerful entities to continue their social domination, and it is this perspective that is most predominant in the United States. Whereas the consensus perspective seems somewhat idealized, the conflict perspective is in contains a healthy
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
A. The statistics at the FBI show that in 2009 there were 6,604 incidents of hate crime, with 8,336 victims and 6,225 known offenders of the crimes (About hate crime statistics, 2009, 2009). B. The FBI refers to hate crimes as crimes of bias, meaning that it is done because the offender holds bias against the victim in relationship to prejudices that they hold (About hate crime statistics, 2009, 2009).
Even the basic healthcare facilities offered to the inmates are tailored to suit the male prisoners thus totally disregarding the minority female prisoner population. It can thus be safely concluded that prisons for female inmates are often invariably a poor adaptation of the male prisons (Bosworth, 2002; Zaitzow and Thomas, 2003).
In other words, both hereditary and environmental factors are equally prevalent for the chronic criminal activities of a person.
Most of the chronic offenders commit more than one type of crime and they engage in
In addition, the frontier lands were devoid of well-constituted police forces with a lot of vigilantism being recorded. Many large cities only had a handful of organized police forces. However, things drastically changed during
The suspect was subsequently charged informally as follows: a) he was denied a lawyer; b) witnesses did not take oath; c) the proceedings were not documented, and; d) sMrs Cook, the complainant, was also absent did not attend key sessions
However, such approval and acceptance may involve labels that are based on something that elicits repeated criminal behavior due to influence of one’s attitude (Akers, 2009).
This is the case of Getrude, my childhood friend who was very shy and reserved. However, one
They stay united, helping each other on welfare matters. Security, food, and living conditions are the main concerns of these subgroups. Not all groups are the same; they vary according to rules and way of