Download file to see previous pages...
they could legally carry out their operations and stating the duties and responsibilities of all the components of the corporations: be they shareholders or directors. In UK, the Company Act contains all these rules and regulations for companies established in the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. However, two versions of the Company Act, namely Company Act 1985 and Company Act 2006 offer varied rights and obligations for shareholders as explained below. Minority shareholders (those whose shareholding is 50% or less), in particular, are given some forms of protection from majority shareholders.
‘A member of a company may apply to the court… for an order under this Part on the ground that the company’s affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner which is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of its members generally or of some part of its members…” [Emphatically a “member” means a shareholder]1
Instituting a legal suit: Shareholders could start a legal proceeding against the directors and the companies in case unexpected unfair practices are discovered. This empowers shareholders to boldly challenge the directors or other management members whenever they abused their positions and undermine the integrity of the company’s constitution2. Some of the abuses include but not limited to the misuse of company’s asset, exaggerated self-aggrandisement and absolute breach of company’s rules to satisfy personal interests. So, minority shareholders, for instance, could only use the power of law here to seek redress against the majority shareholders, managers and directors. For the fact that bad management on the part of the directors could destroy the company’s operations and plunge everyone into insolvency, the opposing action by the shareholders would help return sanity to the company’s activities.
A typical instance of when shareholders kicked against the selfish desires of directors who tried to break the company’s rules in pursuit
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Table of Cases Adams v Cape Industries Plc Connelly v RTZ Corp Plc Conway v Ratiu Dimbleby & Sons Ltd v National Union of Journalists Gilford Motor Co v Horne Jones v. Lipman Rachel Lubbe v Cape Plc Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd Smith, Stone and Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corporation Tate Access Floors Inc V Boswell Introduction One of the main aims of the company law is to safeguard the shareholders’ from being subject to personal accountability for the risks of managing a business.
Note however, that the arbitration system and enforcement capacities also have a role to play as far as business law is concerned. Under this sphere are the commercial courts and the specialized economic courts. They come in when transactions between parties are not honored.
However, some sections of the low can be revoked if they are purely intended to suppress other people. This is mainly regarded as lifting the corporate veil. As such, this essay has been designed to advice John of the law on separate corporate personality and the relevant areas where the corporate veil can be lifted.
The main aim of the modern economy is to co-operate the society. All most in every countries of the world company plays the vital role for the performance of the business. For the maintenance of such types of the performances necessary act is to be passed.
In addition there are several situations when the law is prepare to lift the veil of incorporation either to go behind the corporate personality to the individual members or to ignore the separate personality of several companies in a group in favour of the economic entintyconstituted by the group as a whole 1
We should take masseurs to make up for the defects. Especially for company law, only when we allocate the power correctly can the company move much better.
We know that in China there are all kinds of laws, for example, economical law, administrative law, environmental law, and civil law.
Britain was amongst the first nations to develop rules to regulate how companies operate and introduced a company registration scheme in 1844. Company Law has developed over the years both in common law and through various Acts of Parliament, most recently the Companies Act 2006 which is the first major overhaul of company law in the U.K.
ity of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large" The same report gave some evidence of the different perceptions of what this should mean from a number of different societies across the world. "CSR is about capacity building
In other words, this verdict has provided a veil between an owner and a company and through this veil the owner would not be personally blamed or persecuted if corporate actions have been taken on behalf of the company; Thereby, the company would itself be
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Company Law, Essay questoin for FREE!