StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law" states that corporations enjoy the right to freedom of expression, and a number of property rights. This permits corporations to contest governmental action that attempts to control the property…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law"

The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law of the of the The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law The United Kingdom enacted the Human Rights Act 1998 to incorporate the provisions of the 1950 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms into its national law. This Act has drastically changed the laws of the UK. Prior to the introduction of this Act, cases involving human right breaches were dealt with by the European Court of Human Rights. The UK courts were not in a position to prosecute them. However, this situation has changed with the 1998 Act, which requires the UK courts to adopt the case law of the European Court of Human Rights for interpreting the provisions of the Convention (Human Rights Act takes effect, 2000). The courts in the UK are required to give effect to the provisions of the ECHR, which bestows new powers upon the UK judges. It also requires public authorities to comply with the provisions of the ECHR. In the area of employment law, the HRA focuses on unfair dismissal of employees. The present employment law is effective in protecting the interests of employees. However, in the wake of the HRA, employers would have to be more cautious in their dealings with their employees (Human Rights Act takes effect, 2000). The Human Rights Act 1998 introduces several provisions that relate to employment law. The Act prohibits the unfair dismissal of employees. For instance, Eurostar, reinstated two female employees, it had dismissed for wearing trousers, due to the enactment of the Human Rights Act. The dismissal of female employees, on grounds of inappropriate dress, is generally on the basis of a substantial reason. This clause has been removed by the new Act. However, it does not provide any novel and enforceable rights to employees (Hirst, 2000, 3). Some rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, such as the Article 3 rights that prohibit torture, or subjection to inhuman or degrading treatment, are absolute rights. Judges are required to maintain a balance between the rights and the responsibilities of individuals with regard to their commercial interests. Article 9 provides the right to hold religious beliefs. This is an absolute right; and individuals have the right to manifest their religious beliefs through worship, teaching, practice and observance. These activities can be conducted, either in private or in the public (Lammy). Although it is absolute in nature, it has to be limited to ensure the interests of public safety and to protect public order. The rights and freedoms of people belonging to other religions have to be respected. As such, the courts are reluctant to protect the rights of employees with regard to their religious freedom. For instance, if a Christian employee is required to work on a Sunday, the courts do not consider this to be a breach of his right to religious belief under Article 9 of the Convention. Article 10 protects the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by any public authority. However, this right is not absolute, and it is controlled by the courts to protect the rights of other citizens (Lammy). The term expression encompasses words, pictures, images and actions to express an idea. It also can be information, or even a dress code. The employer may have a desire to project the corporate image by means of a dress code, and the employees may intend to express themselves through their dress. Thus, there should be a balance between these two counter claims. The European Court of Human Rights held that people have the right to express their beliefs through their dress (Lammy). All the same, in a clash between religious freedom and corporate image, the former will prevail. If a higher court finds the UK law to be incompatible with the Convention, then it has to furnish a declaration of incompatibility, in respect of that piece of legislation. In such cases, an amendment will have to be enacted, in a rapid manner. Such speedy action is to be achieved by a ministerial order, and not by means of an act of parliament (Human Rights Act takes effect, 2000). It is possible to take legal action against a company, under the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998, in respect of its actions as a public body. However, this facility is limited in scope, as was disclosed in a 2002 case that dealt with a private care home in Cheshire. Specifically, the residents of this care home had moved the court to prevent the care home from closing down. It was their contention that such closure would infringe their right to a home life. The court, upon a thorough scrutiny of the facts of the case, concluded that the care home was not discharging any public function (R (Heather) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation, 2002). Consequently, it was held by the court that the care home was not responsible for the human rights of its residents. This ruling served to provide a carte blanche for the government and the local authorities, to circumvent human rights responsibilities, by assigning a private character to their functions. However, in Hampshire County Council v Beer, the Hampshire County Council commenced to organise farmers’ markets, under the name of Hampshire Farmers’ Markets. Beer had been actively involved in this endeavour, from its inception; but his application for a license to participate in these markets was rejected. The Court of Appeal permitted a judicial review of the decision taken by the Hampshire County Council (Hampshire County Council v Graham Beer, 2003). This decision was arrived at by the Court, due to the fact that the Council was operating the market on public land and to which the public had been provided access. Therefore, the Court was of the opinion that the Council was behaving as a public authority, in this instance, as per the provisions of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (Hampshire County Council v Graham Beer, 2003). In YL v Birmingham, the question of whether the Convention rights could be invoked, if a public services were provided by a public authority that had contracted for the provision of such services with a private service provider. The Law Lords ruled that the nursing home was not discharging the functions of a public nature. Hence, it was not required to uphold the provisions of the Convention (YL v. Birmingham City Council& Ors, 2007). Corporations have been obtaining the benefits of personhood, without the attendant disadvantages. This inequity has been perpetuated by the UK government, by means of its 1998 Human Rights Act. This Act serves to include the European Convention on Human Rights into the legislation of the UK. As far back as 1993, the UK government had clarified that corporations would not be permitted to take advantage of the proposed Act (Spencer, 2004). Corporations are legally responsible to their shareholders, and these are, in general large financial institutions. Assessment of a company by the stock market, in chiefly on the basis of financial parameters. Consequently, there are no standards, relating to social and environmental parameters that have to be adhered to by companies (Spencer, 2004). The parent companies should be made accountable for the misdeeds of their subsidiaries. This can be achieved, only by changing the law, in respect of corporate killing. However, this will not be effective in cases involving other offences, civil law or offences that take place outside the nation. Exclusion of liability by the parent entity implies that such liability had been transferred to creditors, workers, or the public at large (Spencer, 2004). The present trend results in a cost, risk, benefit approach to violate the law. Since violation of laws is facile and as the liability can be shifted to some other entity; companies can continue to make money by any possible means, at their disposal. Moreover, any risk that is attendant upon such illegal activity can be conveniently circumvented. The best way to curb such criminal activity by the corporate is to treat them as single entities, in a manner that is analogous to the approach adopted in the Tax law. In instances, where a subsidiary is jointly owned by two companies, both the parent companies would be made liable (Spencer, 2004). Nothing much can be expected from the European Court of Human Rights, in cases involving the violation of the human rights of the people, by corporations. This is on account of the fact that the European Convention on Human Rights categories society into only two groups, namely persons and states (Spencer, 2004). Thereafter, it aims to protect the rights of persons from intervention by the state. Thus, the only action possible under the Human Rights Act, against corporations, is by initiating action against them for having caused harm to an individual. However, such action has to deal with corporations, as if they were individuals. An exceedingly, vexatious aspect of the Human Rights Act is that an individual, can waive his rights (Spencer, 2004). Thus several companies have deprived significant rights of their employees, who had failed to go through their employment contracts carefully. Most importantly, corporations can insist upon a fair trial. This provides them with the same rights as individuals, which can prove highly beneficial. For instance, corporations cannot be compelled to incriminate themselves; which allows them conceal related documents in criminal cases. In addition, corporations enjoy the right to freedom of expression, and a number of property rights (Spencer, 2004). This permits corporations to contest governmental action that attempts to control property. The European Court of Human Rights is the court of last resort for cases filed under the Human Rights Act. It has rendered the stance of the UK government meaningless, due to its rulings, which have permitted the corporate human rights, in an indiscriminate manner. References Hampshire County Council v Graham Beer, EWCA Civ 1056 (England and Wales Court of Appeal 2003). Hirst, C. (2000, August 20). Rights Act to Spark Litigation Boom; British Companies and Regulators Stand By For Escalation in Legal Challenges After Human Rights Law is Enshrined in October. The Independent , p. Section: Business; Page 3. Human Rights Act . (1998, November 9). Human Rights Act 1998. Chapter 42 . London, United Kindgom: Her Majestys Stationery Office. Human Rights Act takes effect. (2000, October 2). World Markets Research Centre. Lammy, D. (n.d.). The Human Rights Act, A Business Bombshell? Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://www.davidlammy.co.uk/da/21597 R (Heather) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation, EWCA Civ 366 (England and Wales Court of Appeal 2002). Spencer, R. (2004). Corporate law and structures. Oxford: Corporate Watch. The European Convention on Human Rights. (1952, March 20). The European Convention on Human Rights and its Five Protocols . Paris, France: Council of Europe. YL v. Birmingham City Council& Ors, UKHL 27 (United Kingdom House of Lords June 20, 2007). Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Effect of English Law Human Rights Act 1998 Essay”, n.d.)
The Effect of English Law Human Rights Act 1998 Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561342-the-effect-of-english-law-human-rights-act-1998
(The Effect of English Law Human Rights Act 1998 Essay)
The Effect of English Law Human Rights Act 1998 Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561342-the-effect-of-english-law-human-rights-act-1998.
“The Effect of English Law Human Rights Act 1998 Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561342-the-effect-of-english-law-human-rights-act-1998.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law

Human Rights Act 1998

In 1998,Parliament enacted the human rights act,which had expressly given effect to Convention rights.... In 1998,Parliament enacted the human rights act,which had expressly given effect to Convention rights.... With the passage of the HRA 1998 however, Convention rights have been domesticated and become part of english law to which courts are obligated to legally defer to in their decisions.... With the passage of the HRA 1998 however, Convention rights have been domesticated and become part of english law to which courts are obligated to legally defer to in their decisions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Human Rights and English Law

the law and practice relating to homosexual offences and the treatment of persons convicted of such offences by the courts.... Unless a deliberate attempt is to be made by society, acting through the agency of the law, to equate the sphere of crime with that of sin, there must remain a realm of private morality and immorality which is, in brief and crude terms, not the law's business.... As the paper declares our formulation of the function of the criminal law so far as it concerns the subject of this inquiry ....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Inclusion: The Gender Divide

This essay talks that formal education is a structured effort made by society to impart skills and ways of thinking considered essential for making a positive contribution to society.... Education is targeted at making a person more competent and capable of inclusion into the society.... .... ... ...
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The European Human Rights Act

a) Do you believe that section 3 of the human rights act 1998 creates a new rule of statutory interpretation for judgesYes, section 3 of the human rights act 1998 does create a new rule of statutory interpretation for judges.... "the human rights act 1998 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received Royal Assent on 9 November 1998, and mostly came into force on 2 October 2000.... "In contrast to the importance attached to the democratic accountability of Parliament, institutional checks and balances, and the rule of law as means of safeguarding individual liberties, comparatively little significance was attributed to the European Convention on Human Rights before passage of the human rights act....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

This question requires the discussion of whether the present state of the English law with its recent developments and the effect of the European Union Law provides the defendant in a criminal trial with adequate protection against procedural loopholes allowing the authorities and third parties to obtain evidence unfairly.... The topic is related to confessions which are also largely utilized as a part of the evidence and often raise the issues of the integrity of the defendant's basic human rights....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998

"the human rights act 1998" paper considers whether or not the human rights act 1998 can properly be described as achieving a revolution in the better protection of humans.... In the case of Belmarsh which is also an essential case for judicial review, an overwhelming majority of the House of Lords decided that the indefinite detention of foreigners, on the ground of terrorism suspects was a breach of the European Convention on human rights (and therefore a violation of the ACT)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Are Defendants in Criminal Trials Sufficiently Protected against the Use of Improperly Obtained Evidence

This topic is also related to confessions which are also largely utilized as a part of the evidence and often raise the issues of the integrity of the defendant's basic human rights.... Previously this area was dominated by the common law rules, following the rather inclusionary practice of admitting any kind of relevant evidence no matter where it was sourced from.... There were common law rules which allowed the judges to have the discretion to exclude evidence3 at a criminal trial if this would jeopardize the position of the defendant....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

Business and Employment Laws

Business law is in tune with the European Union's Equal Treatment Directive and it prohibits all discrimination in employment on the grounds of sex including Gender (Sex Discrimination (Gender Reassignment) Regulations 1999), Marital Status (Hurley v Mustoe (1981)) Pregnancy, Sexuality (Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield Secondary School (2001).... it would be treated as direct discrimination and strong punishment for employer would be resulted according to the Sex Discrimination act 1975 Section 1 (Greig v Community Industry (1979); Ministry of Defence v Jeremiah (1980); James v Eastleigh BC (1990))....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us