Download file to see previous pages...
It is particularly true while going through the susceptible doom of Queen Jocasta, the ill-fated wife and mother in the tragedy. As the chorus (lines 1204-1210) enquires the name of the most wretched mother, who has given birth to such an ill-fated child, which would be the murderer of his father and the spouse of his mother in his grown years. Though the entire family of the King including Laius himself, his wife Queen Jocasta and son King Oedipus are the equal share-holders in their tragedy, it is the queen who is the greatest sufferer from the beginning to the end.
The Queen is as one of the most powerful characters of the play. Her character can be analysed from the birth of her first born. Though she belongs to the same culture and civilization overwhelming majority of which maintains unflinching faith in the prophecies, yet the Queen has least reverence for the soothsayers and their predictions since the birth of the child. Despite the very reality that she did not believe in soothsayer’s prophecy regarding her newly born child, she displayed unabated love for her husband, King Laius and advised him not to believe in such prophecies and forecasts regarding the fate of the child. Being a highly dedicated and sacrificing wife, she suggested her husband to kill the child to avoid any mishap in his future years to come. She quite unknowingly believes that the child was dead on the third day of his birth; for the former King Laius and Queen Jocasta abandoned themselves of their own son because they wanted to escape the danger about their fate as well as that of their son. In the play, Jocasta says “Listen to me and learn some peace of mind—no more murdered his father than Laius suffered” (line 780-795). The same plea she takes while advising the Oedipus that the soothsayer had warned them that their own child would murder the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It is essential to understand the meaning of dramatic irony before analysing the impact of the device used in one of the greatest plays by Sophocles, Oedipus the King and understand the perspective from which Sophocles treated this literary device into the plot of the play.
A hero is somebody who would jump into a crowd of bullies to save the life of a girl. A hero would shoot all rascals and yet would survive with a hundred bullets in his stomach. This tells that a hero has traditionally been perceived as a physically strong person, but physical strength is much smaller a virtue than emotional strength.
“Oedipus the King” is a play in which Oedipus is the focal character, and is represented as the most terrible hero. Oedipus is shaped as an attractive personality that has many characteristics, both good and bad.
Therefore, while the tragedy could have been avoided to some extent, by observing g the clues and acting in a different manner, the king, on the other hand could not have avoided to have fate take its course by having the prophesy fulfilled (Brunner, 25).
It generates strong emotions in the viewers. The author creates a perfect tragic hero and his imperfection and his errors in judgment are supposed to go in tandem with his fate. He strongly believes that he can challenge fate, without the realization that the latent force of the fate can outsmart him.
The essay aims at identifying that Oedipus Rex is so replete with irony that it influences most of the important dialogues and plots in the story. Irony is deliberately used quite frequently by Sophocles in an attempt to place a greater emphasis on the appalling outcomes of the tragedy.
In Oedipus the King, it is warranted to argue that fate is uncontrollable. Throughout the work, the author’s sentiments can be interpreted to mean that the famous king had very little in his hands to escape the tragedies that were coming his way.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Essay for Oedipus the King for FREE!