Download file to see previous pages...
There is a huge consensus among economists, including prominent economists within the Obama Administration, on the need to reform the current tax treatment of health insurance.
This would replace the existing system of $300 billion in tax breaks with a universal system of tax credits. Families by default would receive $5,700 and individuals would receive $2,300. Low-income families would get additional benefits.
This would encourage bold liberal and conservative health policy experiment in the states. Similar bipartisan legislation has been introduced in the senate. Congress and the White house have proposed new federal mandates that need employers or individuals to buy government health insurance or pay tax.
This would create new pooling mechanisms the allow group insurance to be offered by individual members and by employers. This would help citizens to get health insurance from churches, alumni and trade association and other civic groups.
This would require the federal government to work with states. Under this exchange the plans would meet the same standards as members of congress and federal employees. The act would allow the pooling between exchanges of different states.
The key feature of the massive house and Senate health bills is that they centralize key decision-making in Washington. These bills would restrict citizens’ freedom due to fines and taxes.
The Patients Choice Act, the improving Health Care for All Americans Act, and the Empower Patients First Act are viable alternatives to the top-down approach. As the President indicated, there is no partisan monopoly on good ideas in health care
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The United States has underperformed the rest of the world for decades in terms of the scope of its healthcare coverage. This lagging behind has caused significant harm to individuals who depend on these kinds of services for their life. Part of this inefficiency and substandard level of care is the rising costs of health coverage.
The goal of national health insurance system is to modify the United States health care system so that affordable, high quality services are available to everyone. The history of the American health care system illustrates the centrality of employment as the basis for obtaining access to health insurance coverage for the working age group.
3962 viewed the Medicare program as a health reforms source of funds in addition to the process of delivering health services, (Swan & Haas 2011). On the other hand, H.R. 3590 provided for the process of delivering care to the patient. This paper seeks to explore the process in shaping the Health Care Reform Bill by stating the differences in the two bills, the legislative process and the shaping of these laws.
The law faced considerable opposition from the Republicans and its repeal failed after it was upheld by the Supreme Court on June 28th, 2012. The reforms spurred by the bill will extend health cover to over 30 million Americans. This will be achieved through the provision of Federal subsidies for the less able and the expansion of Medicaid.
During the period of recession, he took few steps to stimulate the economy of the country. Some domestic initiatives takes during his reign were in the form of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This act is also known as the “Obamacare”. On July 14, 2009 the house of democrats presented a plan regarding the health care system.
The difference this time round is that this promise was made, and the politicians who entered into office made good of their promise to reform the health care system in the US. The Obama administration possessed the political goodwill and ambition to drive the health care reform agenda in the houses of representatives, and through a lot of political lobbying; they were able to pass two critical bills.
To further add to this controversy the federal court for the state of Florida has determined that the Health Care Reform Act is unconstitutional. Lawyers from the White-House have filed responses in regards to separate lawsuits attempting to overturn the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also referred to as the health care act).
Cuts in Medicare, more taxes, absence of new incentives to physicians, and increased expenditure to the government are some of the major drawbacks of the new bill (9 Pros and Cons of the New Health-Care Reform Bill,
Employees will also benefit from the fact that employers will medical insurance for all their employees. An additional group is the adults without children. This group will benefit from the reform since they will be included in the Medicaid (Jackson &
The health care reforms entail all the policies that the government has been making to ensure that the health status of its citizens has been improved as explained by (Jill, 2012). This has resulted in the
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Health Care Reform: Rational Alternatives to the Congressional Leadership Bills for FREE!