Free

Case Brief - McGurn v Bell - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
Case Brief - McGurn v Bell
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Case Brief - McGurn v Bell"

Case Brief RE: McGurn v. Bell Microproducts, Inc. Facts George McGurn met with the president of the Bell microproducts who gave the position of the company. At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause specifying that in case his contract was terminated he will be given half his commissions plus six months’ salary. Following several discussions with an official from Bell, Bell issued him with a contract devoid of the termination clause which he rejected. During one of these discussions, McGurn said that a termination clause covering his initial twenty four months of service was considerable which he says Bell did not object to this. Bell extended another offer which McGurn rejected owing to its termination clause. Finally, Bell extended an offer to McGurn which said that following termination of his employment, he was to be given his basic salary over 6 months plus a lump sum amounting to forty thousand dollars or fifty percent of incentive p.a. but this cover was to last for the initial 12months of his service. McGurn signed as required but crossed out the word ‘twelve” and inserted “eleven” and didn’t inform anyone at Bell of the alteration. Bell’s HRM department received and filed the letter though they denied having viewed it on return. After approximately 13 months, Mcgurn’s employment was terminated, he advised Bell officials that he believed that his contract had a 2year termination clause; they also noted the alteration in the offer letter but refused to pay hence McGurn sued for bleach of contract.
Type of Action
An exception to the rule that offerees who accept an offeror’s performance with the knowledge of offeror’s expectation in return for his performance have impliedly accepted the offeror’s terms. This happens where the offeree receives the advantages of the service offered with a reasonable opportunity to decline them plus grounds to recognize that they were accepted with the anticipation of recompense (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers and Langvardt, 2004). The court borrowed the procedure from two case i.e. Gateway C. v. Charlotte Theatres, Inc. and Kiddlerv Greenman.
Issues
Whether Bell accepted McGurn’s counteroffer and the reasons in law as to why Bell is obliged to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn.
Court Holding
The Bell’s silence amounted to acceptance of McGurn’s counteroffer. The Bell microproducts, Inc. should to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn.
Rationale for Holding
For the first issue, the general rule of law holds that silence in reply to an offer aimed at forming a contract doesn’t add up to an acceptance of the same (Mallor, et al., 2004). However the rule of law applied to the facts is the exception in circumstances where the offeree receives the advantages of the service offered with a reasonable opportunity to decline them plus grounds to recognize that they were accepted with the anticipation of recompense (Mallor, et al., 2004). For the 2nd issue, the general rule of law holds that unless it is established from the records that Bell had grounds to recognize or already knew of the alteration by McGurn to what it had written and that the District courts spots to zero facts from the record that the silence by Bell as a fact in law amounted to the acceptance of the counteroffer by McGurn. However the rule of law applied to the facts is that “a presumably sophisticated employer, who receives a signed letter of engagement from a prospective employee and fails to read the letter, particularly after weeks of negotiation, does so at its own peril.”
Dissenting Opinion
Whether Bell microproducts, Inc. should to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn. The general rule of law holds that unless it is established from the records that Bell had grounds to recognize or already knew of the alteration by McGurn to what it had written and that the District courts spots to zero facts from the record that the silence by Bell as a fact in law amounted to the acceptance of the counteroffer by McGurn. However the rule of law applied to the facts is that If the law or else the view of the majority applied to its rational intense, the offeree might define his/her tasks afresh in absolute terms easily by means of placing a claim that he/she wasn’t conscious of what it has put in its records as obviously demonstrated hence raising a uncertainty.
Legal analysis
I agree with the court’s reasoning that Bell cannot escape the contract liability by simply acknowledging that it ignored to examine the exceedingly vital document necessary for the contract formation particularly in its own files for such a long duration. This is because, the act amounts to negligence or pretence in an effort to escape its responsibilities. I also agree the court’s reasoning that Bell should re-read the counteroffer because ignorance of law is no defense and also failing to do so amounts to negligence on their side.
References
Atiyah, P.S. (1979). The rise and fall of freedom of Contract. Broadbridge: Clarendon Press
Gloucestershire Ltd.
Barnett, R.E. (2003). Contracts. New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Beale, H. (2002). Contract Law. UK: Hart Publishing.
Mallor, J.P., Barnes, A.J., Bowers, L.T., and Langvardt, A.W. (2004). Business Law: The
Ethical, Global and E-commerce Environment. 13th Ed. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill.
McKendrick, E. (2005). Contract Law: Text, Cases and Materials. UK: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Case Brief - McGurn v Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell
(Case Brief - McGurn V Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell.
“Case Brief - McGurn V Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case Brief - McGurn v Bell

Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio

...? Case Brief: Terry v. Ohio of the of the For many years now, Police in the United s have engaged in investigative practices which are commonly known as ‘Stop and Frisk’. This process normally involves the stopping of a person or vehicle with the purpose of interrogation or a brief investigation. This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine

...? Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine Table of Contents I. Facts 3 II. Issue 4 III. Decision 4 IV. Reasons 5 References 8 I. Facts Wyeth markets the drug Phenergan, the generic name of which is promethazine hydrochloride, which is indicated for nausea, as an antihistamine medication. In its injectable form, it can be administered either as a drip, known as an IV-drip, or as a vein-injectable, in a procedure known as an IV-push. It is known that Phenergan can cause gangrene when it is able to get into the artery of a patient, because of its corrosive nature. Such is the case with the plaintiff Levine in this case, whose right hand and later the whole forearm was...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief

...?Terry v. Ohio Case Brief The short of Terry v. Ohio can be explained as the U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the 4th amendment prohibition pertaining to unreasonable search and seizures. The decision of the court states that the 4th Amendment right is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect in the street and proceeds to frisk him even though there is no visible probably cause to arrest the person. Rather, the act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the courts reached when...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Brief The Case Of State V. Stark

...Brief The Case Of State V. Stark History Calvin Stark was convicted within the Superior Court, Clallam County Washington, of two Counts of second-degree dishonor for intentionally disclosing his intimate partner to the HIV (Human Immunodeficiency virus), and he appealed. The Washington Court of Appeals asserted and remitted the case for commutation. Facts On March 25, 1988 Calvin Edward Stark hereafter “Defendant” was tested to be positive for HIV, which was substantiated by further testing initially on June 25 and then again on June 30, 1988. During the period from June 30, 1988 to October 3, 1989, the Clallam County Health Department’s staff met five times with the...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Complete case brief of Nix v. Williams

...Case brief of Nix v. Williams Facts The defendant, Mr. Williams was apprehended and his rights regarding the murder of the child were read to him – after giving information that led law enforcement personnel to the recovery of the body of the victim. The officer that collected the information from him had passed it to officials that had been continuing the search. The statements made by Williams were not admissible as evidence at the court during a trial, but the recovered body, the information from chemical and medical tests, and photographic information were admitted as evidence against him. During the trial of Williams, the court held that, even in the case that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Case Brief U.S v. Hinkley

...Case Brief U.S Vs Hinkley Facts On March 30, 1981, a man d John W. Hinckley Junior shot the then US President Ronald Reagan in an attempt to assassinate him. During the process, he hit and wounded four people who were present on the scene: President Reagan, the Presidential Press Secretary, a Secret Service Agent and a Metropolitan Police Officer. Hickley was immediately arrested and subsequently faced trial for prosecution in the Legal Court of the Columbia district of the USA. Hinckley’s lawyers argued that he was suffering from schizophrenia and his actions were a result of his impaired mind. The defense attorneys also presented medical evidence in the Court which supported their claim. On July 21,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Love Brief case state v stark

...Case brief: Stark v. Stark Facts: In the year 1988 it comes to Stark’s knowledge that he is HIV positive. After confirmation of the disease he receives proper counseling and training as far as safe sex and managing his HIV was concerned. Despite numerous warnings Stark disregards the doctor’s orders, which was when he is left with no choice but to implement a “cease and desist order” authorized by RCW 70.24.024(3)(b). Even then Stark’s failure to comply resulted in his doctor reporting his actions to the County prosecutor’s office where he was then charged with three accounts of assault in 2nd degree under RCW 9A.36.021(1)(e). Proceeding: The proceeding can be correctly categorized into...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina

...Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina Procedural History The case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina was decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina. It was appealed up to the Supreme Court of North Carolina from the trial court to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, and finally to the State Supreme Court. Facts Relevant facts to the case having a bearing on the final verdict of the court included whether investigator, DiCostanzo’s taking J.D.B. to the conference room of the school for questioning constituted custodial arrangement of questioning, wherein the accused was not provided Miranda alerts, and that he was forced to make and sign the...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Brief of case U.S v. Kozeny

...United s v. Kozeny 582 F. Supp. 2d 535 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85443 (2008) Facts of the Case: SOCAR is the oil company of the Republic of Azerbaijan. During the middle of the 1990s, Azerbaijan started a privatization program, where President Heydar Ali-yev had the authority to decide if and when to privatize SOCAR. Bourke and others allegedly breached the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by paying certain Azeri officials to persuade them to privatize SOCAR and to allow them to partake in its privatization. Bourke argued that these payments were legal under Azeri law and also under the FCPA because they were outcomes of extortion, and that by reporting the payments to the President, he should be absolved of...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver Case Brief

...Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver Case BriefCase 11.2 Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver 166 Wash. App. 1006 (2012). Court of Appeal of Washington Issue Seawest Services Association have responsibility of supplying water in and out of a housing development. Residents inside the housing development received water services from Seawest at a fee. Residents outside the housing development that received the water services were also required to pay the supply and maintenance fee. The Copenhavers were limited members of the housing development, they purchased a house outside the housing development but received water services from Seawest...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case Brief - McGurn v Bell for FREE!

Contact Us