StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Case Brief - McGurn v Bell - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94% of users find it useful
Case Brief - McGurn v Bell
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Case Brief - McGurn v Bell"

Case Brief RE: McGurn v. Bell Microproducts, Inc. Facts George McGurn met with the president of the Bell microproducts who gave the position of the company. At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause specifying that in case his contract was terminated he will be given half his commissions plus six months’ salary. Following several discussions with an official from Bell, Bell issued him with a contract devoid of the termination clause which he rejected. During one of these discussions, McGurn said that a termination clause covering his initial twenty four months of service was considerable which he says Bell did not object to this. Bell extended another offer which McGurn rejected owing to its termination clause. Finally, Bell extended an offer to McGurn which said that following termination of his employment, he was to be given his basic salary over 6 months plus a lump sum amounting to forty thousand dollars or fifty percent of incentive p.a. but this cover was to last for the initial 12months of his service. McGurn signed as required but crossed out the word ‘twelve” and inserted “eleven” and didn’t inform anyone at Bell of the alteration. Bell’s HRM department received and filed the letter though they denied having viewed it on return. After approximately 13 months, Mcgurn’s employment was terminated, he advised Bell officials that he believed that his contract had a 2year termination clause; they also noted the alteration in the offer letter but refused to pay hence McGurn sued for bleach of contract.
Type of Action
An exception to the rule that offerees who accept an offeror’s performance with the knowledge of offeror’s expectation in return for his performance have impliedly accepted the offeror’s terms. This happens where the offeree receives the advantages of the service offered with a reasonable opportunity to decline them plus grounds to recognize that they were accepted with the anticipation of recompense (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers and Langvardt, 2004). The court borrowed the procedure from two case i.e. Gateway C. v. Charlotte Theatres, Inc. and Kiddlerv Greenman.
Issues
Whether Bell accepted McGurn’s counteroffer and the reasons in law as to why Bell is obliged to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn.
Court Holding
The Bell’s silence amounted to acceptance of McGurn’s counteroffer. The Bell microproducts, Inc. should to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn.
Rationale for Holding
For the first issue, the general rule of law holds that silence in reply to an offer aimed at forming a contract doesn’t add up to an acceptance of the same (Mallor, et al., 2004). However the rule of law applied to the facts is the exception in circumstances where the offeree receives the advantages of the service offered with a reasonable opportunity to decline them plus grounds to recognize that they were accepted with the anticipation of recompense (Mallor, et al., 2004). For the 2nd issue, the general rule of law holds that unless it is established from the records that Bell had grounds to recognize or already knew of the alteration by McGurn to what it had written and that the District courts spots to zero facts from the record that the silence by Bell as a fact in law amounted to the acceptance of the counteroffer by McGurn. However the rule of law applied to the facts is that “a presumably sophisticated employer, who receives a signed letter of engagement from a prospective employee and fails to read the letter, particularly after weeks of negotiation, does so at its own peril.”
Dissenting Opinion
Whether Bell microproducts, Inc. should to revisit the offer it wrote and signed earlier after it has been countersigned and returned by McGurn. The general rule of law holds that unless it is established from the records that Bell had grounds to recognize or already knew of the alteration by McGurn to what it had written and that the District courts spots to zero facts from the record that the silence by Bell as a fact in law amounted to the acceptance of the counteroffer by McGurn. However the rule of law applied to the facts is that If the law or else the view of the majority applied to its rational intense, the offeree might define his/her tasks afresh in absolute terms easily by means of placing a claim that he/she wasn’t conscious of what it has put in its records as obviously demonstrated hence raising a uncertainty.
Legal analysis
I agree with the court’s reasoning that Bell cannot escape the contract liability by simply acknowledging that it ignored to examine the exceedingly vital document necessary for the contract formation particularly in its own files for such a long duration. This is because, the act amounts to negligence or pretence in an effort to escape its responsibilities. I also agree the court’s reasoning that Bell should re-read the counteroffer because ignorance of law is no defense and also failing to do so amounts to negligence on their side.
References
Atiyah, P.S. (1979). The rise and fall of freedom of Contract. Broadbridge: Clarendon Press
Gloucestershire Ltd.
Barnett, R.E. (2003). Contracts. New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Beale, H. (2002). Contract Law. UK: Hart Publishing.
Mallor, J.P., Barnes, A.J., Bowers, L.T., and Langvardt, A.W. (2004). Business Law: The
Ethical, Global and E-commerce Environment. 13th Ed. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill.
McKendrick, E. (2005). Contract Law: Text, Cases and Materials. UK: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Case Brief - McGurn v Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell
(Case Brief - McGurn V Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell.
“Case Brief - McGurn V Bell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557109-case-brief-mcgurn-v-bell.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case Brief - McGurn v Bell

Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine

...? Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine Table of Contents I. Facts 3 II. Issue 4 III. Decision 4 IV. Reasons 5 References 8 I. Facts Wyeth markets the drug Phenergan, the generic name of which is promethazine hydrochloride, which is indicated for nausea, as an antihistamine medication. In its injectable form, it can be administered either as a drip, known as an IV-drip, or as a vein-injectable, in a procedure known as an IV-push. It is known that Phenergan can cause gangrene when it is able to get into the artery of a patient, because of its corrosive nature. Such is the case with the plaintiff Levine in this case, whose right hand and later the whole forearm was amputated following the entry of Phenergan into her artery by way of an inadvertent...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Case Brief U.S v. Hinkley

...Case Brief U.S Vs Hinkley Facts On March 30, 1981, a man d John W. Hinckley Junior shot the then US President Ronald Reagan in an attempt to assassinate him. During the process, he hit and wounded four people who were present on the scene: President Reagan, the Presidential Press Secretary, a Secret Service Agent and a Metropolitan Police Officer. Hickley was immediately arrested and subsequently faced trial for prosecution in the Legal Court of the Columbia district of the USA. Hinckley’s lawyers argued that he was suffering from schizophrenia and his actions were a result of his impaired mind. The defense attorneys also presented medical evidence in the Court which supported their claim. On July 21, 1982, the jury acquitted Hinckley...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Analysis of Trust Law Case

Once the court is satisfied that the “declarant had the requisite intention it will strive to validate it.”3 Certainty of intention will therefore be the most important element for determining whether or not the letter constitutes an enforcable trust.

Assuming that the trust held by the trustees under the father’s will trust in favor of Sally and the trust agreement in respect of the horse are valid trusts the question of cetainties are not valid except to the extent that a new trust is created in favor of Sally’s children and thereby extinguishing the previous trusts. This is particularly so with respect to the will trust. The trust agreement over the horse only involves the disposition of a ben...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Henry V by Shakespeare and the Rover by Aphra Behn

Henry V recognizes that his kingship is not a rule of lavishness but a rule of service. Summarising everything of what Henry is, Nym, a commoner, and thief, claimed: “The King is a good King…” (Shakespeare, Henry V)
Second, his glib of tongue he uses to empower his soldiers, to give life and courage to his downtrodden men. He does not use his eloquence to deceive nor to perpetuate lies. Rather, he uses his articulateness to restore the bravery of his soldiers, to supplicate God in his favor. All of which is a recognition that Henry V values more the camaraderie that he has with his soldiers above anything else. And this he succinctly shows even as a young King. He said to his men as they are about to fight...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

The Idea of Liberty in Sam Slime Case

... Sam Slime This could certainly be the case of the rich get richer and the poor go to jail, especially in a country that is trying to serve many masters. The government of the United States is certainly a political and governmental entity, but at it heart it has almost always been a voice of corporate business and expansion of wealth for the few. It operates seemingly under the principle guise of what is good for business is good for the people. One could say that the state of the economy today is the fallout of this mindset. In the “Sam Slime” case study we see the idea of liberty as applied by several masters. The first, when Sam Slime mugs you outright is a matter for governmental law and order. Cleary there is a criminal (Sam...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Business Ethics in the Case of Timberland-City Year

The purpose of this study is to focus on the ethical considerations and dilemmas faced by the organization Timberland in terms of its coalition to City-Year and the steps that are taken and should be taken for the solution of those ethical issues.

In the merger of the two organizations, Timberland and City Year, there are many ethical considerations. To develop legal business relationships between Timberland and City Year and to consider the stipulations of the required business laws, the following ethical considerations should be deemed:
  • None of City Year’s earnings should be incurred to any private shareholder or an individual.
  • City Year cannot participate in any political campaign or...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

International Affairs v. Liberalism

As a matter of fact, Hoffman’s statement that “international affairs is the nemesis of liberalism” has a grain of truth in it and this is especially so after the 9/11 incident.
There are two schools of thought or perspectives that are used to view international affairs: liberalism and realism. The study of these two perspectives is significant to the idea posed by Stanley Hoffman because they determine the reasons why international affairs, according to him, does not only see eye-to-eye with liberalism but seems to stand on the opposing side of it.
Liberalism can be defined as having four elements: citizens; the legislature; property rights, and; a market-driven economy (Dunne 186). Realism, on the othe...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Case of Fisher v Brooker

Fisher first filed his claim in 1993, some of the laws applicable to this case have undergone considerable amendments. However, based on the shreds of evidence presented under this case, we can clearly see that the House of Lords dealt with this case properly and that the judges made extensive analysis and thorough evaluation of the issues at hand. To get a clear picture of how the House of Lords decided this case, let us take a look at the different issues involved in this case and how these issues were resolved.

There are at least seven issues raised by the parties in this case. These issues were as follows: (1) whether or not a fair trial is possible in this case considering the time between the composition of the wo...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case Brief - McGurn v Bell for FREE!

Contact Us