Tall Organizational Structure and Scientific Management - Essay Example

Law and Management By Institute Question No A-For the purpose of formation and termination of the project I-Terms of contract For the formation and termination of project a contract or agreement is a conventionality attained among two or more individuals/groups that is officially enforceable when carried out in agreement by means of precise requirements. Formation of contracts and termination of contract engrosses an assortment of terms of contracting that should be according to a project as well as reproduce the conformity among the contracting individuals/ parties. Contracts are noticeably a main fraction of every deal as well as it is consequently indispensable that every one individual/ parties to an agreement identify the formation and termination terms of contract incorporating in as well as the privileges plus tasks of the participating groups under that contract (David, 2009). Below I have presented the main terms of contract for the formation and termination of contract: Acceptance; Offer; Deliberation (at the same time note the point in association to Scotland below); and Purpose to build officially authorized associations. The acceptance of a contract of a suggestion takes place while there is an untrained recognition of the entire accessible terms. Despite the fact that, this is extraordinary as well as there will usually be a time of collaboration. New terms as well as conditions presented in the course of cooperation in consequence quantity to a succession of responses to present the unique offer, cancelling the conditions and terms of the unusual offer (Contract). II-Frustration of contract If an agreement is prepared, and for any cause it afterward turns out to be unworkable to for one party to act upon their obligations, then we need to think about frustration. Be cautious to note that frustration is about following impossibility; if an agreement was impossible to carry out right from the beginning, then the matter is one of error and not frustration (Smithies, 2007). Frustration of contract is a fake declaration of contracting details prepared through one participating contract party to another participating party as well as has the outcome of suggest that contacting group party into the agreement. For instance, beneath definite state of affairs, frustration of contract makes a statements or promise prepared through a retailer of goods concerning the excellence or feature of the manufactured goods that the vendor has may encompass the developed standards or misrepresentation. A conclusion of falsification permits for a conduct of rescission as well as irregularly guarantee depending on the kind of distortion (Smithies, 2007). B In this situation Harry offer his Motor Cycle for sale to Ian at $ 500. The main mistake done here is the establishment of any detailed document for regarding the offer. Here no time limit is defined no prices is established. In this situation Harry is free to sale his bike on the passage of specific amount of time. Now he is going to sell the bike to James at $ 450. This deal is his legal right and Ian is not able to claim, because at the time of dealing or offer no deadline or promising details are settled. Question No 2 What elements must a claimant prove if he wishes to make a claim under the tort of negligence? Negligence is a recognized law theory in the general law authorized systems usually utilized to accomplish reparation for harms (not mishaps). Negligence is a kind of delict or tort, although this idea is normally used in criminal regulation as well. Tort of Negligence is not the similar as "inattention", for the reason that someone could be working out as a great deal of care as they are knowledgeable, on the other hand still drop down the point of capability predictable of them. It is the reverse of diligence1. Distinctive method for assessing negligence requirements that an applicant establish the tracking 4 issues through a "hold of the confirmation" (Larson, 2003): 1. The defendant dishonored that duty; 2. The defendant allocated a responsibility to the applicant 3. As a consequence of the defendants abuse of that responsibility, the applicant undergoes damage; as well as 4. The damage was a just about predictable result of the defendants accomplishment or functional For instance, an individual driving a vehicle has a wide-ranging responsibility to manner the vehicle in a secure and accountable way. If a vehicle driver drives in the course of a red light, the vehicle driver goes against that responsibility, for the reason that it is predictable that driving a red light would consequence in a vehicle crash, as well as that citizens are anticipated to be injured in such a accident, the vehicle driver will be lawfully answerable in carelessness for some injuries that in detail outcome to others in a accident consequential from the driving of the red light (Larson, 2003). The tort of negligence suits has formerly been examined in phases, acknowledged as elements, comparable to the inquiry of offenses, Ordinary law controls can be diverse a little in the specific classification of the rudiments of negligence, and on the other hand the fundamentals that have to be recognized in each negligence criteria are (Larson, 2003): Breach Duty Damages Causation The tort of negligence can be visualized of as containing immediately 3 elements:- Conduct Causation Damages Normally, it is acknowledged that to have four (causation, breach, duty and pecuniary damages) or else 5 (actual cause, breach, proximate cause, duty and damages). Every one would be accurate, relying on how a great deal specificity somebody is looking for. "The extensive agreement on the theoretical model," engrosses acceptance that the five fundamentals are most excellent acknowledged by means of concern as well as kept detach. On the other hand in performance," he sets off on to caution, "various diversities of disorder or theoretical faults have intermittently happened (Larson, 2003). Once it is accepted that the defendant allocated a responsibility to the claimant, the subject of whether or not that responsibility was violated have to be developed. The inquiry is together individual as well as aims. The defendant who intentionally (prejudiced) interpretation the claimant to an extensive danger of loss, violates that responsibility. The defendant, who is unproductive to comprehend the significant danger of failure to the claimant, that some reasonable individual in the similar circumstances would apparently have understood, as well breaches that responsibility (Larson, 2003). Question No 3 Illustrate the principle of economic loss as a consequence of the claimant acquiring a defective item of property The main economic loss is financial loss independent by means of physical harm to the claimants individual or assets. In this group the claimant possesses the property, on the other hand it is uncovered following he has obtained it that the possessions has a fault as well as the claimant has to expand capital in restoring or restores it (Sabapathy, 2009). It is the group of cases that has fashioned the majority noticeable shifts of lawful ideas in association to asserts for financial defeat, at the start in support of permitting claimants to develop for similar sufferers where the assets consisted of a hazardously out of order organization, then authorizing claimants to be successful for the hammering where the imperfection could not be classified because hazardous, as well as finally frequent to a additional conventional approach in 1990, when the House of Lords apprehended that the harm in together areas was simply financial as well as consequently canceled (Law-of-Tort, 2009). At the start, the harm can disrupt the claimants potential to continue his dealing as in: The legal courts in this matter have always declined to permit revitalization for financial loss in this situation. The claimant can have a contractual authority to utilize the belongings for the ideas of his company, however no proprietary attention in it. Harm to the possessions can place him to the expenditure of restoring it. Next the claimant can suffer loss as an outcome of harm to possessions fitting in to a third group where the applicant is at danger as to the hammering at the instant of the harm beneath an agreement by means of the third party (Law-of-Tort, 2009). Question 4 A-Development of effective team in the building industry A team can be defined as a faction of people having a inclusive set of complementary expertise that are required to carry out a specific task, activity, or project (Business Directory, 2009). Another definition of team, a team is a collection of few people with admiring expertise who are devoted to an established intention, objectives, and approach for which they work jointly responsible (Prelude Consulting Ltd, 2008) The development of the effective project team in building industry is really essential. This encompasses the establishment of better working group. The development of the team for building industry is really essential for the reason that in this area we need deep and comprehensive cooperation among the project personnel. Project team development for building industry has turned out to be vital part of building industry project success. Now project mangers are paying more attention towards building a more collaborative and balanced project team (Performance, 2009). The most significant time for new building industry project development is the building of the more enhanced project team in the beginning of the project. This is the initial possibility to develop the accurate intuition on the whole team association (Performance, 2009). Here I will present the main factors involved in the process of the team building, and development of the successful project team and it’s utilization for the completion of the organizational project. These five steps will present the main procedure for the development and execution of the better project team. 1- Recognize the precise requirements of the project. Each development project is diverse from another, as well as the structure of team requirements to reproduce the precise objectives of the project. A manager can be attracted to make use of the similar project team for each project; on the other hand this can not be the majority well-organized utilization of expertise as well as instant for the public concerned. Evaluations of the precise development jobs, as well as decide what precise settings as well as abilities are necessary (Kristoff, 2009). 2- Utilize the expertise of a convincing and competent leader. The organizational project manager will carry out the intact project team to accomplish in the course of the implementation of the development. The manager should have a high-quality expertise of the project matter issue, established management expertise as well as the capability to observe development as well as maintain the project on timetable. In scientific areas, many employees through means of extensive substance data and information are not able to be the outstanding managers (Kristoff, 2009). 3- Decide project team members to set up the necessities of the development. Project team associates are the individuals that carry out the project tasks. Evaluation of the precise requirements of the development from the above given Step 1, as well as decide for project team associates that entirely meet every of the project requirement. If a project needs to study about the nature of materials that will be used in the building project, a project team member using research knowledge in the topic area requires to be chosen (Kristoff, 2009). 4- Carry in novel associates to fill potential gaps. If the present workers pool does not wrap the all the necessary requirements for a project, a project manager must bring project team associates as workers or as advisor to join the development team. This technique is helpful if a business specialist in a precise area is necessary. For instance, if a goods development project team seems to evolution a product to marketplace, it is very important for the project team to utilize associates by means of commercialization as well as developed of experience (Kristoff, 2009). 5- Observe the performance of the project team eventually. Occasionally, project scope can be modified or changed over time. Workers circumstances can also be changed over time. The development executive wants to check the general performance of the project team as entire in addition to that of project team members, to make sure that the project team turns out to be most excellent balanced to conclude the project productively. This can necessitate rotating a number of project team associates in at convinced points in the development timeline for precise requirements, or affecting associates out of the project team as needed (Kristoff, 2009). Here I will present the factors involved in the selecting a right project team (Kristoff, 2009). Obtainable Resources Interpersonal communication Control plus procedures of project Problem resolving as well as decision making Experimentation and creativeness Self-evaluation Functions, responsibility, and power Team effectiveness B-Common Features of projects The projects have numerous common features. These can be related to working aspects of the project (Laudon & Laudon, 1999). Below I have given the few common features of projects: The process of selecting project team The process of gathering project requirements The process of the handling risks The management of resources The management of the working process The selection of the project team structure Role of Project manger Management makes a decision and applies the methods and ways to successfully and proficiently make use of the human and nonhuman resources to achieve predetermined goals. In a small sense a project manager carries out the similar activities as other managers (Gray & Larson, 2006). That is, they plan, schedule, motivate, and control. Project managers are anticipated to line up resources to accomplish a permanent life cycle project on time, on budget, and within the specification. Project managers are the straight bond to the customers and must supervise the interface between customer expectations and what is practicable and sensible (Gray & Larson, 2006). They offer direction, organization, and incorporation to the project team. Project managers are accountable for performance normally with insufficient authority. They must make certain the proper trade-offs are made between the time, cost, and performance requirements of the project (Gray & Larson, 2006). Project manger should have high-quality communication capabilities that will provide him priceless information associated to the project position in an appropriate and efficient way. The project manager should have the skills and capability to deal with the conflict through the conflict resolution skills: at the bottom of in declaration of some project disputes consequently that the project group associates all sense fraction of the procedure and desire to continue concerned in the project (Warren, Rad, & Botzum, 2004). The negotiation skills are also imperative for project manager this will assist in the upholding associations by people who are concerned in the project (Anderson, 2004). The confront for project managers is to work out disciplined appearances of project management that are well-organized, diminish project risk, are flexible, and cooperative for the individual conditions of more risky projects (Goodwin, 2001). Leadership is indispensable for a project manager who has to encourage and motivate team members who are the part of the development group. A project manager has to work out his management delicately for that reason he produces wholehearted and productive hold up for the development and the project group with no reasoning techniques in the direction of home departments to get weaker. The management requirement is to support commanding cheerful devotions mutually to the well-designed organization and to the project (Anderson, 2004). Question 5 A- Pros and cons of scientific management To the worker To the employer Scientific management is a presumption of administration that evaluates as well as produces workflows, by means of the intentions of humanizing work output. The fundamental thoughts of the hypothesis were presented by the work of Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1890s and 1880s, as well as were initially offered in his monographs, Sales administration as well as the ideology of scientific organization (Winslow, 2009). Now I will present the main pros and cons for the scientific management for the worker and employer, given by (Backer, 1998): This Scientific management provided the initial formal divisions among employees as well as administrators. Contribution to well-organized manufacturing techniques, imperative to a main worldwide augment of livelihood standards. Spotlight on the personality duties and employee level. Straight recompense methods for employees rather than useless end-of-year proceeds distribution systems. Methodical. Inappropriate supporter of excellence standards. Proposition systems for employees, who should be pleased through cash premiums. highlighting on evaluation practical as well as practical in times and situations Limitations of Scientific Management Scientific management can be harmed to exploit human beings. Not practical to agreement through worker or teams. Leaves no space for person predilection or proposal. Overemphasis on strength of mind Mechanistic Severance of development occupation as well as doing. hammering of proficiency level as well as independence at employee level B- Advantage and disadvantages of tall and flat organizational structure Advantage of tall organizational structure Advantages of tall organization are given below (Organizational-Structure, 2009): 1. There are many layers 2. Suites to a kind of work that is routine in nature 3. Employees required a smallest amount assortment of skill Disadvantage of tall organizational structure Disadvantages of tall organization are given below (Organizational-Structure, 2009): 1. Few people reporting to administration 2. Employees itself can have need of close administration 3. Less formalization of policy 4. Team worker are probable to follow continuous development  Advantages of flat organizational structure Advantages of flat organization are given below (Flat, 2009): 1. Enhanced communication among administration and personnel. 2. Enhanced team sprit 3. Less bureaucracy and easier assessment making 4. Less rank of administration that incorporates profit simpler as subordinate costs as directors are 5. Normally compensated additional than employee Disadvantages of flat organizational structure Disadvantages of flat organization are given below (Flat, 2009): 1. Employees can have additional than one director/superior 2. Can bound/hinder the enlargement of the association 3. Organization imperfect to undersized associations simply for the reason that companies, co-operatives 4. As well as a number of private limited corporations 5. Purpose of every subdivision/individual could be unclear as well as combine into the 6. Employment functions of others. Question no 6 Using table complete the question:: Activity Duration Link To 1. 0 1,3 2. 3 4 3. 2 4 4. 3 5 5. 2 6 6. 4 7,10 7. 5 8,16 8. 1 9 9. 10 12 10. 5 12 11. 2 14,15 12. 4 13 13. 4 11 14. 10 18 15. 5 18 16. 3 17 17. 5 18 18. 2 - Question No 6 Network Diagram 0 1 0 0 0 Project duration 70 days Critical Activities 18,15,8,1 Bibliography 1. Anderson, S. D. (2004). Project quality and project managers. International Journal of Project Management , 10, 138-144. 2. Backer, P. R. (1998). Scientific Management. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/pabacker/scientific_mgt.htm 3. Burke, R. (1999). Project Management: Planning and Control Techniques. Chichester: Wiley. 4. Business Directory. (2009). Team Definition. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from BusinessDirectory.Com: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/team.html 5. Contract. (n.d.). ClickBank Client Contract. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from 2009: http://www.clickbank.com/terms.html 6. David, L. L. (2009). The Terms Of The Contract. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from Lesson 69 - Contract Law in Cyberspace 4: http://www.ssrn.com/update/lsn/cyberspace/lessons/contr04.html 7. Flat. (2009). Flat Structure Organisation. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from http://www.learnmanagement2.com/flat%20structure.htm 8. Goodwin, R. S. (2001). Skills required of effective project managers. Journal of Management and Engineering , 3, 217-226. 9. Gray, C., & Larson, E. (2006). Project Management, The Managerial Process. . New York: McGraw-Hill. 10. Kristoff, S. (2009). Building a Successful Project Team. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from How to Select the Best Mix of Personnel to Ensure Project Success: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/help/HA012110441033.aspx 11. Larson, A. (2003). Negligence and Tort Law. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from Law Offices of Aaron Larson: http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/negligence.html 12. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (1999). Management Information Systems, Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall . 13. Law-of-Tort. (2009). NEGLIGENCE - DUTY OF CARE . Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from a-level-law.com: http://www.a-level-law.com/tort/Negligence/duty_lecture.htm 14. Organizational-Structure. (2009). Organizational Structure. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from Organizational Structure: http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:O_7ggKLwyC8J:goldik.com/BEd/files/Organizational%20Structure.doc+advantage+and+disadvantages+of+tall+and+flat+organizational+structure&cd=17&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk&client=firefox-a 15. Performance, T. K. (2009). Project Management. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from http://www.bnet.com/: http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=96340 16. Prelude Consulting Ltd. (2008, 02 04). Team definition. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from Prelude Consulting: http://www.prelude-team.com/team/team-building/team-definition 17. Sabapathy, S. (2009). Tort recovery of pure economic loss for defective premises: a comparative analysis. International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry . 18. Smithies, D. (2007, August). Contract - Frustration. Retrieved August 08, 2009, from Tutor2u.Com: http://tutor2u.net/law/notes/contract-frustration.html 19. Warren, C., Rad, A., & Botzum, a. S. (2004). Integrated Risk Management Within NASA Programs/Projects. In Space Systems Engineering and Risk Management . 20. Winslow, F. (2009). What is Scientific Management? Description. Retrieved 08 08, 2009, from Frederick Winslow: http://www.bola.biz/motivation/taylor.html Read More