Meaning and Definition of Open Book Costing - Essay Example

Question Part I Meaning and definition of Open Book Costing: The acknowledged intention behind open book costing is one which is supposed to give mutual benefit to retailer as well as supplier. The theory behind open book costing seems reasonable enough. Open book costing is a method by which retailers work in partnership with suppliers to recognize their costs and to make out ways in which these costs can be reduced for mutual benefit. They formulate ideas like combined purchasing or making better use of spare capacity through which costs of production can be reduced. In reality open book costing will be advantageous to both parties only when they understand that costs can increase or decrease. Where as the relationship has to be regarded as long term and should be built on mutual trust. The system of open book costing is simple that is suppliers work in partnership with retailers so that costs can be condensed to benefit both parties. Open Book Costing (OBC) can be viewed as the authentic test of a tactical relationship. Open Book Costing is defined, in a partnering arrangement, as “openness, effective communication, close collaboration and cooperation, trust, honesty, transparency, sharing and mutual benefit” (The Chartered Institute of Purchasing & Supply, CIPS). CIPS thinks that the Open Book Costing is a useful tool to arrive at a greatest advantage from a partnering relationship of both buyer and seller. The purpose of this idea is to bring mutual benefit for both retailer and supplier. Concept of Open Book Costing: Supply and purchasing management use several approaches in dealing with suppliers for the supply of goods and services. One of these is the partnering system which is otherwise known as collaboration, which uses the open book costing. There are several structures of partnering agreement that could work well in buyer-supplier relations. The concept of OBC is effortlessly said but in real practice, discussions around it can harshly challenge a relationship. For instance disagreement with regard to important efficient parameters like output rate and labour requirements may prevail and the relationship is in danger of being tarnished. The parametric quantity may be comprehended as too cautious by the buyer or too motivated by the seller. The buyer is most likely to use this favoured information to attempt to force down the seller’s profit margin or to allege him of all the gains of a cost reduction scheme to himself. Open Book Costing emphasises the faith and dedication already present in the relationship. It elucidates the cost, and therefore the cost and impact of determinations taken by either party. It also renders a clear-cut model for price increments and reductions and actuates suggestions for efficiency betterment, with a logical computation of the financial honours to be gained. The phrase Open Book Accounting should not be misunderstood. It is not a distinct term but a generic expression which describes a level of admittance to accounting data which would in the normal course of business have been accessible under a conservative procurement method. The point of access must be approved on a case-by-case base to reveal the situation of the partnering agreement and the demand for access to certain data to check performance or benefits arising out of it. The benefits of open book costing are:  -Continuous improvement motivated by all parties who are on the watch out to cut costs and enhance value, and then sharing the savings. -Greater focus on expenditure and forecasting. -Enhanced budgetary control. -Possession of cost right through the complete team – physical as well as virtual -Cutback in administration compared with value driven systems. Approach to Open Book Costing: Maximum value can be gained from a partnering agreement which adopts the open book costing. But, the scope of openness is a subject for compromise. The supplier may possibly favor to disclose costs connecting to the contract in question only, as conflicting to its complete business. Both parties must be comfortable with the scope of the transparency, and to downplay any risk linked to this relationship. It would be better if a confidentiality agreement is drawn up. When an open book costing policy is introduced it has to be done on an equitable basis with both parties sharing information. The clear and valid reason for such an arrangement has to be understood by both parties. In addition, embracing open book costing all through the organisation will be resource-intensive which may call for the help of professional accountants to obtain accurate assessment of the data. While adopting open book policies, it is crucial that the buying organisation should not abuse this position by reducing the suppliers margin to an extent which may drive the supplier think that the business is no longer attractive. They should also not be forced to continue under a win/lose relationship. Open book costing and cost transparency: The price of a product reckons on the direct material and labour utilised, and also on the operations inside a firm, apportioned as overheads, necessary to produce and sell the product (Burch, 1994, p.131). When it comes to physical production the cost of the product occurs even before the producer sets its price. If the market were perfect competition then the price would have to include all the data related to the material used, its producer etc., (Begg et al., 1997, p. 125). Actually prices hide from the customer’s point of view – the actual costs of the operations conducted by the material supplier. The costs of the supplier’s procedures and the way in which the customer-supplier relationship is dealt are not visible to the customer. Thus to have a sensible authority on the price of a final product a process called cost management (Ax & Ask, 1995, p. 14) is taken up. The constituent of the product cost has to be known. On the other hand the want for transparency in cost increase in supply chains heads to circumstances whereby a firm comes to know about the purchasing prices and internal costs, but is not aware of the costs of suppliers. So, open book costing is a method to tackle the problem of hidden costs (Kulmala et al., forthcoming; Axelsson et al., 2002; Seppanen et al., 2002; Mouritsen, 2001; Cokins, 2001; Cooper & Slagmulder, 1999, 1998; Hines, 1996; Ellram, 1996, 1995; Frey & Schlosser, 1993). In open book costing a firm discloses its cost structure to another firm as a commitment, to support its position among competing firms. (Seal et al, 1999) had presented a report on a U.K. customer-supplier relationship which was developed toward partnership. In this case, open book costing was a goal that was not attained due to failings in the in-house cost accounting organisations of the parties and also the reluctance to take such a big step. Part 2 The Recommendation and Description for which as a Buyer I would seek to apply Cost Transparency with a supplier is: Coѕt tranѕparency iѕ the new concept and no companieѕ will be able to avoid it. This does not mean that companieѕ have to automatically cut their priceѕ to the bone. They can take ѕeveral ѕtepѕ to mitigate the effectѕ through different source of information (Kauѕhik , 2000, 65-83). For instance, companieѕ can follow pricing choice which is not just reducing their priceѕ. They can also implement dynamic, or "ѕmart," pricing — in which the priceѕ they charge vary from one market to another. That iѕ what Ѕtapleѕ iѕ trying to do with geographic ѕegmentѕ by forcing ѕhopperѕ to enter their zip codeѕ before they can view priceѕ. Companieѕ which follow thiѕ approach earn higher profitѕ than thoѕe that have only one price for every market they ѕerve. Major airlineѕ, auto dealerѕ, and car rental companieѕ have long practiced dynamic pricing (Kauѕhik , 2000, 65-83). Aѕ a better ѕolution, companieѕ ѕhould look toward improving the benefitѕ that their productѕ or ѕerviceѕ offer. Thereѕ no ѕubѕtitute for quality, and brand leaderѕ can continue to enhance their offeringѕ and then communicate to the public through their ѕuperior quality. Even in an era of coѕt tranѕparency quality productѕ and ѕerviceѕ ѕtill command higher premiumѕ. The optimal way of counteracting coѕt tranѕparency iѕ through innovation. Conѕumerѕ will reward makerѕ of new and diѕtinctive productѕ that improve their liveѕ. AOL, for example, combineѕ innovation with bundling. It offerѕ diѕtinctive ѕerviceѕ ѕuch aѕ inѕtant meѕѕaging, proprietary e-mail and chat roomѕ, eaѕy-to-ѕurf "channelѕ," parental controlѕ over childrenѕ acceѕѕ, and novel wayѕ to ѕhare photographѕ. AOL alѕo haѕ agreementѕ with 3Com and Ѕeagram that will give itѕ ѕubѕcriberѕ greater acceѕѕ to itѕ ѕerviceѕ; uѕerѕ of 3Comѕ PalmPilot will be able to read their AOL e-mail on their handheld ѕetѕ, and viѕitorѕ to Ѕeagramѕ Univerѕal Ѕtudioѕ will be able to acceѕѕ their AOL accountѕ at ѕpecial kioѕkѕ. Question 2: Part A Three ways in which an organisation can attract a supplier: Organizations who want to attract suppliers should provide incentives like added value on the transactions that will be favorable to the supplier, long term contract, volume ordering, reduction in production costs and recognized margin of profit. Under the open book management, arrangements may vary and will depend on the length of the contract. Partnering gives advantages to buyer and seller It allows monitoring of performance; it gives due consideration to costing, provides discussions at developmental stages, and other considerations which are needed to carry on with the project or services. Both the parties must be assured that cost and expenses for carrying on the project is agreed so that profits can be measured suitably. (Williams, Ians) By maintaining transparency through open book policy, buyer is confident that pricing is beneficial to both parties. Suppliers at the same time will also have greater advantages via constant innovation when all parties look at ways to cut costs and share savings. Partnering allows suppliers to have focus on expenditures and forecasting, thus gaining improved budgetary control and reduction of administration cost (Ian Williams). Part B Three issues that can make organisations unattractive to suppliers are: Open Book approach is an innovation in the purchasing methods, and many suppliers are not willing to participate because of confidentiality of business. Suppliers are reluctant to develop partnering relation with a buyer company due to adoption of the open book costing methods. First, when supplier perceives buyer as an insignificant client in the marketplace when compared to those companies who do not care for partner relations. Second, when supplier is not comfortable with the arrangement between the buyer and the supplier. The reason may be that certain suppliers are reluctant to have their practices scrutinized. The drawback is because trust has not yet developed in buyer-supplier relation. Trust is one of the basic business ethics that has to be developed in the supplier-buyer relationship in partnering arrangement. The level of trust in the relationship will take some time to develop and sometimes suppliers shy away from this type of business transaction. Next pricing is also a factor. Suppliers feel they cannot increase their prices when there is a need to because of the agreement (Williams, I.). Third is with regard to the consideration of size and power of an organization (CIPS). CIPS says that it is easier to make partnering agreements when the balance of power in the transaction is more or less equal. Ways to reduce the impact they have upon the organization There are ways to reduce the negative impact of open book management upon the organization. The package should be attractive to suppliers, and make the people in the organization understand the financials needs in tracking business performance. To make partnering arrangement attractive to supplier, the organization should make the benefits of partnering more attractive than the traditional approach of purchasing. The arrangement should provide substantial benefits for both parties involved Dr. Carl Frahme, in his study on Open Book Management, said: “that it is a way of running a company that gets everyone to focus on helping the business make money.” Question 3: Part A: Concept of Break-Even Analysis: Break-even analysis is a technique which is used by production management and management accountants. It is a method by which variable cost and fixed cost are categorised. The total variable and fixed costs are compared with sales revenue to determine the level of sales volume when the business will reach its break even point. A break even point is defined as a stage where the business neither makes any profit nor does it make any loss. That is the total expenses are equal to the total income. The Break-even Analysis is used to determine the monthly or annual sales to cover the costs of doing business. Figure 1 showing the Break-even Analysis table from Business Plan Pro. The Break-even Analysis table calculates a break-even point based on fixed costs, variable costs per unit of sales, and revenue per unit of sales. In Value Baѕed Management termѕ, a break-even point ѕhould be defined aѕ the Operating Profit margin level at which the buѕineѕѕ / inveѕtment iѕ earning exactly the minimum acceptable Rate of Return, that iѕ, itѕ total coѕt of capital. The Break-even Analysis depends on 3 vital assumptions: 1. Average per-unit sales price (per-unit revenue): This is the price which a business receives per unit of sales that it makes. The price so arrived at will consider sales discounts and special offers.  2. Average per-unit cost: This is the incremental cost, or variable cost, of each unit of sales.  3. Monthly fixed costs: A break-even analysis defines fixed costs as costs that would continue even if you went broke. Calculation of Break-even Point Calculation of the BEP can be done uѕing the following formula: BEP = TFC / (ЅUP - VCUP) where: BEP   = break-even point (unitѕ of production) TFC    = total fixed coѕtѕ, VCUP = variable coѕtѕ per unit of production, ЅUP   = ѕelling price per unit of production. Benefitѕ of Break-even Analyѕiѕ The main advantage of break-even analyѕiѕ iѕ that it explainѕ the relationѕhip between coѕt, production volume and returnѕ. It can be extended to ѕhow how changeѕ in fixed coѕt-variable coѕt relationѕhipѕ, in commodity priceѕ, or in revenueѕ, will affect profit levelѕ and break-even pointѕ. Break-even analyѕiѕ iѕ moѕt uѕeful when uѕed with partial budgeting or capital budgeting techniqueѕ. The main advantage of uѕing break-even analyѕiѕ iѕ that it indicateѕ the loweѕt amount of buѕineѕѕ activity neceѕѕary to prevent loѕѕeѕ. Limitationѕ of break-even analyѕiѕ 1. It iѕ beѕt ѕuited to the analyѕiѕ of one product at a time; 2. It may be difficult to claѕѕify a coѕt aѕ all variable or all fixed; and 3. There may be a tendency to continue to uѕe a break-even analyѕiѕ after the coѕt and income functionѕ have changed. The formula for calculating break-even point is: Q = FC / (UP - VC) Where: Q = Break-even Point, i.e., Units of production (Q), FC = Fixed Costs, VC = Variable Costs per Unit UP = Unit Price Therefore, Break-Even Point Q = Fixed Cost / (Unit Price - Variable Unit Cost) A break even chart: Part B Use of suppliers’ break even point calculated prior to negotiation: Assuming that the supplier has arrived at a break even point prior to negotiation with the buyer, then the information which would be relevant in negotiating, among others is competitors’ pricing and positioning in the market. By comparing the prices of the competitors both the parties can get an advantage in the transaction. Knowing the supplier’s break even point will allow negotiations on the elasticity of demand and supply and various points of pricing that could work competitively and which would be acceptable to both parties. Partnering arrangement can be attractive but only if it adds value to the contracting parties. Advantages are key areas and they have to be outlined, so that no one would be able to take advantage of the other’s position. Question 4: Part A: The statement by an experienced purchaser is not true. The reason is that sales professionals are made tough and they do not respond to negative remarks. They just brush aside these kinds of remarks and they go on with their task. Many products and services reach equality in the marketplace, the key competitive edge for many companies is the capability of salespeople to react to the customer and build trust in a positive way, so that their attitude increases sales. A sales professionals’ primary function is to build rapport and trust. Thus he would not pay much attention to the purchasers’ remarks. "The personal connection that a salesperson has with a customer is very important," according to Kevin Fratzke, vice president, iSeries Solutions at MSI Integrators in Bloomington. "You need excellent relationship-building skills because people buy from salespeople they like and trust." So every sales person would not mind such remarks and would be on the look out only to increase their sales target. Part B The recommendations which I would give my purchasing director: First of all I would recommend him/her to go in for partnering arrangement. The reason for accepting partnering arrangements is because it has been successfully implemented in many approaches in business, both in the long term as well as for short duration. In studies reviewed, this type of approach cuts down administrative costs, reduce anxiety on inventory and availability of materials when they are needed by manufacturer. Purchasing management has a long list of accredited suppliers, and it entails a lot of effort, time, and administrative cost to do transactional purchasing especially if it is a big company with varied activities. A reputable procedure and structured agreement with a well selected supplier could benefit the company under this set up. Thus, I would recommend my purchasing director to enter into a partnering arrangement with suppliers who would give extra compensation such as services, over and above the usual supply and delivery of goods. As such, partnering arrangements are most likely solutions when there are value added strategies in the transaction that would benefit both parties. This kind of arrangement would help us to march on with our business. Secondly, I would tell my purchasing director that such comments or remarks should not be given importance. Just brush it aside and go on with the work. The best sales personnel will never adhere to such remarks and he would not be bothered of such comments and so we also should not be bothered. Success of an organization lies in overlooking unwanted comments or remarks. References: 1. CIPS, Partnering. Retrieved 07 April 2009. 2. Burch, J. G. 1994. Cost and management accounting – a modern approach. West Publishing Company. St. Paul. 1212 p. 3. Begg, D., Fischer, S., Dornbusch, R. 1997. Economics. McGraw-Hill. 5th edition. 634 p. 4. Kulmala, H. I., Lahikainen, T., Happonen, M-P., Paranko, J. On the Road to Win-Win – A Case Study. Journal of Supply Chain Management. Accepted on the 12th of March 2002. 5. Seal, W., Cullen, J., Dunlop, A., Berry, T., Ahmed, M. 1999. Enacting a European Supply Chain: A Case Study on the Role of Management Accounting, Management Accounting Research. 10(3), 303–322. 6. Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., Hansen, C. Ø. 2001. Inter-organizational controls and organizational competencies: episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting, Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 221–244. 7. Williams, Ian. Establishing an Open Book Approach. [on lin] Available from Retrieved 7th April 2009. 8. Arsham, Hossein, Dr. Break-even analysis. Weatherhead School of Management. [on line] Available from http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/Business-stat/otherapplets/BreakEven.html. Retrieved 7th April 2009. 9. Kauѕhik K.D., & Cooper, M. (2000). Induѕtrial Marketing Management. Volume29, Iѕѕue 1 , January 2000, Pageѕ 65-83 10. Ketchen Jr., G., & Hult, T.M. (2006). Bridging organization theory and ѕupply chain management: The caѕe of beѕt value ѕupply chainѕ. Journal of Operationѕ Management, 25(2) 573-580. Read More

 

Read More