Supreme court justices- controversial case - Essay Example

Most commonly, the separation of church and state applies to autonomous maintenance of both secularity and religious exercise. In recent news, Chief Justice Samuel Alito has repeatedly proven himself unfit for the position he has thus far occupied. As per a specific chain of events that led to his forced resignation, I have taken over his position on the Supreme Court. As most are aware, the former Chief Justice Samuel Alito maintained constant sway toward the conservative right, often tying up verdicts due to his obvious religious views and allegiance to the republican party.

Alito was nominated to fill the position once occupied by Sandra Day O’Conner, by President George W. Bush on October 31, 2005. He has maintained a consistent record of conservative rulings since that time including cases such as C.H. versus Olivia et al and the case of ACLU versus Schundler. Both of the afore mentioned cases were ruled in favor of religion versus separation of church and state. Generally, conservative rulings are rulings that are in favor of the government or the large corporations as opposed to liberal rulings which focus on civil rights and the ruling in favor of the individual or smaller organization.

As per the resignation of Chief Justice Alito, I have been appointed by the new President of the United States, Barack Obama. Just recently, a case has come before me which revisits the notion of separation of church and state. This case is known as Smith-Jones vs. the state of Pennsylvania. In this case, Jack Smith and Larry Jones have joined in matrimony under the authority of a Buddhist religious leader via a private ceremony. However, the existing laws do not favor same sex marriages when it comes to filing taxes (or anything else for that matter).

The dilemma faced by Mr. Smith-Jones and Mr. Smith Jones is that when it became time to file taxes, the Smith-Jones couple was not able to file as