Free

12 angry men movie - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
12 angry men movie
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "12 angry men movie"

16 Feb. 2008 12 Angry Men The film “12 Angry Men” is a critically acclaimed film directed by first time director Sidney Lumet and released in the year 1957. The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is assigned the job of looking into the case. It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three minutes in the washroom. The movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from another medium) and finds a place in the list of all time great movies. In 2007, the library of Congress chose “12 angry men” for preservation in the United States National Film Registry. Here, we analyze the dynamics of the 12 jurors and what might have influenced them in taking a decision in favor of or against the accused.
Story line
The movie begins with the scene in which the judge is seen giving instructions to a jury consisting of 12 gentlemen. The judge informs the jury that the defendant will have to take the electric chair if proved guilty. The jury is also instructed that their judgment should be unanimous. The jury then moves into the jury room where they get acquainted with the other members of the jury and start their work. The case which opens up as an open and shut case takes a turn when one of jurors (juror #8) decides to veto the decision of the other eleven jurors. He is able to convince the other jurors that the defendant should be acquitted as there is doubt beyond reasonable limit questioning the authenticity of the witnesses. However, the other jurors do not follow the juror #8 quickly. The juror #8 faces strong argument from the other members which sets up the film. The jury decided to vote 12-0 in favor of acquittal and closing scene shows the twelve jurors leaving the jury room to present their findings of fact to the court.
Temerity of Juror #8
Juror #8(Henry Fonda) is the most important character of the plot as he is the first to veto the decision and question the authenticity of the witnesses. Though the juror #8 appears both confident and nervous at the beginning, as the discussion proceeds he succeeds in making the other jurors believe in his argument that there is doubt beyond reasonable limit in declaring the boy as guilty of murder. Juror #9 immediately supports the view of juror #8. Juror #5 and #2 also follow juror #9. After the elucidative argument by juror #8 most of jurors (#11, #6, #7, #12, # 1) decide to vote not guilty. However, #10, #4 and #3 continue to stand by their view that the boy is guilty. Also, juror #11 looked indecisive and kept changing his mind. The main turn around of events occurs when the juror #8 questions the uniqueness of the murder weapon (switchblade) by producing an identical one. Juror #10’s bigoted point of view and comments makes the other jurors to question his integrity. Also, the reliability of the other witness is weakened when the jury comes to know that the witness may not have been wearing her spectacles at the time of murder after which juror #4 also votes not guilty. At last the adamant juror #3 also gives up and votes not guilty after looking accidently looking at a picture of his son. Hence, juror #8 succeeds in convincing a group of varied personalities from the foremanship, juror #1, to the subdued, #2, to the stubborn,#3, to the unflappable,#4, to the energetic,#5, to the principled,#6, to the indifferent,#7,to the wise,#9, to the bigot,#10, to the proud American,#11, to the indecisive,#12. All the twelve men are seen leaving the jury room to the court to submit their verdict in the closing scene leaving the viewers to decide the happenings inside the courtroom. Jurors #8 and #9 are the only ones seen exchanging their names. All the other jurors are known only by their number.
Conclusion
I personally feel that the judge would have acquitted the accused on the basis of “lack of strong evidence”. Juror #8’s (character name Davis) ingenious method of argument pictures the overall circumstances in which the murder took place look very shady. I am sure that the judge would have also ruled in favor of the boy like the members of the jury. I also feel that the questioning of the uniqueness of murder weapon and the validity of the other witness as strong points favoring the boy’s acquittal. The accused boy being a member of an ethnic minority group might have won the sympathy of judge in the courtroom. It was clear that the boy had won the sympathy of jury members especially after the racist comments passed by the juror #10. The use of numbers for jury members instead of names projects their personality better. The viewers care only about the personality of jurors as they do not have to remember their names. Overall it is a well written and well directed movie with exceptionally professional performance from the cast of the movie.
Works cited
Lumet, Sidney, dir. “12 Angry Men”.
1957. Orion-Nova Productions. 1957. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“12 angry men movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1544548-12-angry-men-movie
(12 Angry Men Movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1544548-12-angry-men-movie.
“12 Angry Men Movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1544548-12-angry-men-movie.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF 12 angry men movie

Social Psychological Perspective of Movie 12 Angry Men

...? 12 Angry Men: A Study of Group Leadership Director Sidney Lumet’s 1957 film “12 Angry Men” did not dowell at the box-office thanks to the full-color motion pictures that continued to draw many away, nor did it receive widespread awards and accolades within the film industry, although it did receive several nominations for Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay. This dramatic representation of what occurs on a hot afternoon in a jury room following a disturbing murder case in which a young boy faces life in prison or execution does not contain any of the flashy car chases or steamy love scenes...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men

...James Svara shows us in the Ethics Triangle how we as managers, leaders, and ethical people can handle situations by applying key elements of principle, greatest good, and character around duty. In 12 Angry Men, the application of this method is put to the test - especially with juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, and his example shows us how we can utilize all three ethical approach methods. Juror 8, is one of twelve men, each coming from different backgrounds, careers, prejudices and beliefs, asked to judge one of their peers. The defendant is an 18-year old kid who allegedly has killed his father with a switchblade knife, in a heated fight. Based on the knife, the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

12 Angry Men - Movie Review

...12 Angry Men- Movie Review The Story-Background: 12 Angry men is a movie based on the trial of a teenaged South American boy accused of his father’s murder. The movie is set in the jury room where 12 men are to decide the fate of the boy based on the facts as provided before and their own deliberations. But there can be only two verdicts, and if they choose “guilty” the boy will go the electric chair for his death sentence. There is no choice of appeal. However, if they have reasonable doubt about the case they must acquit the boy of the murder charge. His life now lies in the hands of the 12 men who begin the deliberations almost convinced of his guilt but as it is later revealed their judgments are clouded by personal biases... and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

12 Angry Men (1957) -

...Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx 4 November 12 Angry Men The movie12 Angry Men’ is a ic example of how a person’s strong conviction can enter hearts of others and make them think with a different outlook. The movie begins with the judge asking the jury to retire in the other room and come up with a decision. Eleven out of twelve jury members are in staunch support of the accused being given capital punishment. But there is one person who has ‘reasonable doubts’ in his mind about the evidences and the witnesses. He decides to vote not guilty for the accused and starts to give the logic behind his...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Analysis of 12 Angry Men Movie

... Analysis of 12 Angry Men Movie12 Angry Men is a movie where Puerto Rican, an 18year old is on a trial for allegedly knifing his father to death. After listening to the witnesses, the twelve jurors retire to the jury room admonished that the boy is innocent until proved guilty. The jurors deliberate after a while and it is clear that they plan to give their verdict quickly without further discussions. All jurors other than juror eight vote for conviction, each with varying reasons to be revealed later in the discussion. Juror 8 manages to convince them to a discussion because he believes that the boy...
1 Pages(250 words)Movie Review

12 angry men

...12 Angry Men The movie12 Angry Men” is an archetypal courtroom movie featuring twelve jurors and a defendant, accused of murder. The movie depicts the jury as the core and integral part of the criminal justice system. In the movie, one of the jurors is of a dissenting opinion and passionately attempt to free the accused. He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the case reaches...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

...Group process in the film “12 angry men” The jury deliberation in the film, “12 angry men” is a portrayal of group dynamics. Group dynamics relates to the functioning, structure and the roles individuals play in a group. The jury in the film, consisting of twelve men, was drawn together to determine whether the boy was culpable of killing his father. The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the coldly analytical...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Analysis Summary of the movie 12 Angry Men using group dynamics

...College Introduction This paper is a summary of the dynamics of the group of jurors in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is astory of 12 jurors in a 1957 New York jury room deliberating on a case of a young Latin man who is on trial for the murder of his father. The law requires a unanimous decision and a guilty sentence would mean the death penalty. The setting is a room boiling in the summer heat with no air-conditioning except for a small fan and some windows. As the temperature rises the intensity of the situation begins to unfold. The story line provides examples of: persuasive leadership, social influence and group development...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

12 Angry Men (Movie)

...12 Angry Men (Film) Question Symbolic convergence theory Symbolic convergence theory explains the cohesive nature of social groups by sharing emotions, meanings and motives. The theory postulates that humans always want to understand an occurrence depending on the people involved their motivations, personality traits and agency of the occurrence. The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the effects of discussion in the courtroom coupled with their individual prejudices...
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review

Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men

...Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men Affiliation: Introduction Evidence decision-making processes and organizational behavior is observed in the movie 12 Angry Men (1957). A recap on the film shows 12 men deciding the fate of an 18-year-old man accused of killing his father. These men, jurors, give their opinions and vote (guilty or not guilty) based on rational and irrational reasons. As observed within the movie, a variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. Movie Analysis Conflicts According to the movie, Juror # 10 is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous" (Lumet,1957). This portrays... the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic 12 angry men movie for FREE!

Contact Us