David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
The aim of this work is to understand, why the case of Katz v. United States is still important for the legal practice, especially from the viewpoint of the security threats existing after the events of 9/11, and why Sklansky in his article 'Katz v. United States: The Limits of Aphorism' states that this is one of the most important and universal Fourth Amendment cases ever decided…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
David A. Sklanskys view of Katz v. United States
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States"

Download file to see previous pages (Sklansky, 2006) According to the author, Katz case remains a landmark both because it provides the constitutional framework that continues to govern electronic surveillance, and because it provides the modern test for a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
The Fourth Amendment has been the cornerstone in many legal cases for the limits to which the privacy of the person can be breached for the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases. However, the case itself remains rather ambiguous, and there is still doubt, whether taking into account the modern situation after the events of 9/11 electronic surveillance and eavesdropping should be allowed without a warrant Some suppose that the judicial decisions made by Burger and Rehnquist may diminish the effect of Katz's case. It is possible to have a look at least one of the cases ruled by these justices in relation to the Fourth amendment:
'Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979). ...
he urgency of the Katz's case is still relevant and even in the light of terrorist threats in the modern society it has its weight, it gives more questions, than answers. It was interesting to note, that actually Katz is viewed as a failure among scholars. It is agreed, that his striving to prove that surveillance is legal, but only under a warranty, is important, but the case itself has not set any reasonable limits for privacy and it should be defined; whether this framework should be adopted outside the domestic law enforcement and what it has to do with the new communication technologies. Sklansky notes, that 'reasonable expectation of privacy sounds nice, but what does it mean' (Sklansky, 2006) The question is absolutely reasonable, taking into account that the privacy has become a subject of major concern now with the cases of privacy breaches more and more frequent, and inability of Courts to define the reasonable privacy limits when it comes to crime. Noting again the events of 9/11 and bearing in mind that terrorist acts' elimination requires special thorough investigation and action, there is a question how privacy issue and national security issue can be weighted by both public safety entities and the court In Katz's case Justice White still left certain space for consideration, noting that in 'national security cases electronic surveillance upon the authorization of the President or the Attorney General could be permissible without prior judicial approval.' (Kitch, 1968) As a result and following the case, the executive Branch has asserted the power to use unwarranted electronic surveillance in the two specific types of national security situations: against foreign intelligence and against domestic subversion. This has been an attempt to weight privacy and ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States Essay”, n.d.)
David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531034-david-a-sklanskys-view-of-katz-v-united-states
(David A. Sklansky'S View of Katz V. United States Essay)
David A. Sklansky'S View of Katz V. United States Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531034-david-a-sklanskys-view-of-katz-v-united-states.
“David A. Sklansky'S View of Katz V. United States Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531034-david-a-sklanskys-view-of-katz-v-united-states.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
ib
ibalistreri added comment 2 months ago
Student rated this paper as
At first, I thought 3 of pages is too much for such a question. But now I see it could not be done smarter. As the author starts you see the depth of the question. I’ve read all at once. Precise document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States

Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner)

...of death or serious physical injury to innocent persons or police officers and the crime involved is a felony. Dissenting opinion The rule against the use of deadly force seems to provide an avenue to create room for suspected felons to elude capture by fleeing the scene of crime. It should be justifiable if police fire at suspects as a measure of last resort. Conclusion Thought the application of deadly force to capture escaping suspects is unconstitutional, it may reasonably be applied when the suspect is thought capable of causing grievous harm or death to police officers or other members of the public. 3. CASES: Katz v. United States. CITATION: 389 U.S. 347 (1967)...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Smith v. United States

...school law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Eastland, T. (2000). Freedom of expression in the Supreme Court: The defining cases. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Farish, L. (1997). Tinker v. Des Moines: Student Protest. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc. Farish, L. (1998). The First Amendment: Freedom of Speech, Religion, and the Press. Hillside, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc. Gold, S. D. (2007). Tinker v. Des Moines: Free speech for students. Tarrytown, N.Y: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark. Lane, R. W. (1995). Beyond the schoolhouse gate: Free speech and the inculcation of values. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press. Stocks, J. D. (2008). Supreme Court...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

United States v. Wade

...?United s v. Wade A bank robbery on September 21, 1964 in Eustace, Texas led to the arrest of Billy Joe Wade and two others. As per the Miranda Rights of the accused, counsel was duly appointed to Wade in order to represent his legal interests. Two weeks after his arrest, Wade was placed in a line up with other similar looking men where the two employees who were present during the robbery positively identified Wade as one of the perpetrators. The witness identification procedure was undertaken by the FBI without considering the need of the accused to have legal counsel present. During the trial, Wade's legal counsel tried to get an acquittal for their client based upon their belief that the Fifth Amendment Rights of their client... was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

United States v. Salerno

...?United s v. Salerno United s v. Salerno was the landmark case that called into question the “Bail Reform Act of 1984”. It was during the trial for this case that the US Supreme Court decided that a detainee may be kept under arrest provided that the prosecution could prove that the accused was a danger to the community and other people. Therefore, there was no violation of the 5th amendment nor the Excessive Bail Clause of the 8th Amendment. This case was based upon the arrest and subsequent indictment of La Cosa Nostra boss Anthony Salerno on violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act). Due to...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

United States v. Lopez

...was wrong (Fedorko, 2001). Initial decision The clause of the Gun-Free School Zones Act that prohibited possession of firearms within school premises or within 1,000 ft. of a school falls under section 922(q). Alphonso’s appeal to dismiss the case was rejected by the District Court on the grounds that s 922(q) is a “constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate activities in and affecting commerce” (United States v. Lopez, 2013). Going against this decision of the court, it was held by the Court of Appeals that there was not enough “congressional findings and legislative history” (United States v. Lopez, 2013)...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Nixon v United States

...crucial minutes of one particular tape were erased in five separate segments. The privileged information contained within these tapes, if accessed by the above-mentioned body will further lead to the establishment of an atmosphere of political insecurity that has already been created due to the illegal activities of President Nixon and his staff. “In all of this, President Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional Government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.” (House Committee on the Judiciary, p 3). These tapes are now a matter of national security and must neither be...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Begay v. United States

... than on how the offender executed it at a particular occasion. From this point of view, the justices cited the two cases of Taylor v. United States (1990) and James v. United States (2007) in observing that the act of attempted burglary fits the definition of violent felony, especially the second clause even in occasions where it is committed in a manner that doesn’t portend the threat of physical harm. The Supreme Court also took exception with DUI as defined under the New Mexico criminal statute is insufficient in fitting it under violent felony as expressed in clause 1 of the Act. The Mexican DUI law does not explicitly incorporate the use of, attempted use, or threatened application of physical force against another person... Violent...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

United States v. Angevine

...Running head: business United s v Angevine Barring (very unlikely) explicit assurances of privacy from the company, should an employee have any expectation of privacy while in the workplace? Ideally, companies provide technology and related infrastructure to help its employees deliver better performance and results. It is very rare that companies provide such facilities as complementary benefits to its employees. Complements from companies usually include other kinds of gift items, remuneration etc, and not IT-related equipment. Equipments such as computers, laptops, phones etc provided by the company accompany their usage regulations and are, thus, monitored for usage. All companies...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

United States v. Jones

...United s v. Jones In the fourth amendment of US constitution, unreasonable searches and seizures against an individual are prohibited and require the judicial sanction of warrants before searches, seizures are initiated, and there must be a probable cause to effect the same (Wetterer 24). Under the amendment, searches and seizure warrants are limited depending on the information made available to the court issuing the search and seizure warrants by an officer, who swears by the same (Wetterer 78). Aspects based on the fourth amendment forms the basis for the case between United States versus Jones. In the making of court decisions involving the fourth...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)

...). Hence, the Fourth Amendment rightfully protects the petitioner against invasion of privacy. The judge disregarded the term “constitutionally protected area” in the context of the Fourth Amendment and explained that constitutionally it is not a right to privacy. The government had enough evidence to establish that the petitioner was using the specific telephone to transmit gambling information to persons in other states thereby committing a federal offence but acquired the information illegally. 5. Does this case involve governmental or private actions for the purpose of the Fourth Amendment? Explain. The case involves private actions for the purpose of the Fourth Amendment. The courts seek to determine the extent to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States for FREE!

Contact Us