Evidence Law - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
In this case, the matters of major significance are forced confessions received from the alleged offenders, Harry and Fred, and also the incriminating evidences found in their possession. Section 76 (2) (b) of the Police and Evidence Act 1984 says that the confession gained should not have been extracted from the defendant as a result of anything said or done.
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Evidence Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Evidence Law"

Download file to see previous pages In such cases, it is deemed that the confessions ceases to be reliable, and, as a result, may not tenable in a Court of Law. In such cases, what needs to be assessed is not what transported after the confessions was obtained, but what anteceded the confession, or in other words, the role of actions that led to the signing of the confessions by the defendants. "To justify the arrest, there had to be evidence that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that the arrestee had committed the offence." (What is a citizen's arrests 2007).
In the interpretation of Section 76 (2) of the Act, it has been determined that where the prosecution wished to admit evidence in substantiation of their arguments, to establish complicity of the accused, the Courts, may disallow the said evidence to be used, if it has reasons to believe that this has been given under 'oppression' of the person, or by the occurrences of certain events or circumstances, which has rendered the evidence as unreliable. In such cases, it is for the prosecution to evidence that the evidences, true or otherwise was not obtained through "oppression' or other undesirable methods. (Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Ch 60). 2007).
It is further seen under Section 78, that the law also covers exclusion of 'unfair evidence' which states, that the Courts have discretionary powers to disallow evidence brought in by the prosecution as a basis of their argument, which, in the opinion of the Court, could have an "adverse effect" on the principles of fair trial for the accused. How However, this section needs to consider taking cognizance of the inclusion of evidence when rule of law specifically provides that it should be obeyed by the Court. (Statutes: Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Ch 60): Part VIII - Evidence in Criminal proceeding: General Confession:
In this case it is seen that proceedings were initiated against Mr. Harry Collingwood and Mr. Fred Vaughan after alleged possession of items that could because blasts were recovered from search of their premises. Although they maintained their innocence, they were denied services of lawyers, and were subjected to physical and mental degradation. A solicitor or appropriate adult must be permitted to consult a detainee's custody records as soon as practicable after their arrival at the station and at any other time which the person is detained. (Police and criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). 2007).
After this, they were forced to sign confessional statements accepting their complicity in the bomb blasts in Central London station. The evidences that could be used against Harry and Fred are: 1. the presence of incriminatory evidences in their premises 2. Their confessional statements forcibly made by Detective Inspector Lewis.
There are various statutes which deal with the matter of explosive substances found in the possessions of residents of UK. Under the Explosive Substances Act 1883, if any explosive substances are found in the possession of a person, unless he can prove that its use was for 'lawful purposes' he could be sentenced to penal servitude for not less than 14 years, or imprisonment for 2 years. (Explosive Substances Act: 1883. 2007). In this case, if the substances were genuinely in the possession ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evidence Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529172-evidence-law
(Evidence Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529172-evidence-law.
“Evidence Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529172-evidence-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evidence Law

Law Evidence

...Part One This research will begin with examining the THREE cases of obtaining evidence as confessions.,illegally, or improperly obtained evidence and silence as evidence put forth in Ian Dennis argument. The argument will be constructed in light of the laws that govern each individual case and conclude with the research. Improperly obtained evidence- The English Law in its fairness decides it is rational to exclude improperly obtained evidence so England's policy was to include the evidence regardless of the source or how it was obtained. The most frequently quoted authority was the 1861...
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study

Discussion on Evidence Law

...including what quantities of amphetamines would be made and sold in Canberra. W2 will testify that he saw A and B ingesting amphetamines on numerous occasions. Discuss the relevance of each of these items of evidence. In this case, we deal with the relevance of evidence in each case and the importance of evidence law. The law of evidence include substantive law, civil and criminal law and regulate the means by which facts are produced and proved in courts and legal battles (Bates, 1980). Evidence must conform to certain rules in order to be admissible. At the trial of A, witness...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Law of evidence

...Number Word Count: 1459 Expert Witnesses The rules regarding expert witnesses seemingly regulate and limit any amateur witnesses from coming in and submitting evidence as an expert witness. These rules come from the statutory provisions set out in the Criminal Procedure Rules 2005 and Civil Procedure Rules 1998, as well as a selection of case law which tends to limit who can be considered a witness for trial purposes.1 By analysing the law that governs the use and admission of expert witness testimony, it can be determined if amateurs are in fact allowed to testify in situations where the area of expertise is sufficiently obscure, or if they are in fact considered experts with regards...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Different Aspects of Evidence Law

...Evidence Law In law, rape is the most serious kind of assault and is punishable with life imprisonment. The offence is defined in part section of the Sexual Offence Act, 2003, and is defined as follows: 1. A person (A) commits an offence if- (a) He intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. 2. Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents (4), on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life. On a charge of rape absence of consent1 is very important... of non consent;...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

The Law of Evidence

...The Law of Evidence The law of evidence does not stop with the guarantee of the truthfulness of the evidence. They also require that the non-expert witnesses testify according to their personal knowledge and in what they call "language of perception." Witnesses must testify in a highly conventional style, quite difficult to master, often enforced by the judge's orders, "Just tell us what you saw" or "Just tell us what you did." The court is not interested in the witness's interpretations of what occurred, or his opinions of states of affairs he could not perceive through one of his five senses (McKay and Colman, 1991). That would, of course, "usurp the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Law of Evidence

...Law of Evidence In asking for prior ments to be admitted in testimony, the prosecution can invoke Section 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act of 1865 if the witness’ present testimony in the court proves to be adverse. The relevant provision states that when a witness has made a former statement which is inconsistent with his testimony in Court, “proof may be given that he did indeed make it” and the Prosecution could use this argument to justify admitting his oral statements to Duane as evidence1. In this case, the testimony of WPC Kite is going to be averse to Duane’s interests and on this basis, the prosecution counsel can contradict by introducing prior oral statements that are inconsistent with the oral...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Evidence Law - Victoria (Australia) Legal Case Commentary

...Introduction A long held concept of criminal law dictates that a confession ment is only admissible in evidence at the criminal trial if it was freely given. Implicit in the doctrine of free choice is a requirement that the confession statement is obtained by proper means in that the suspect has not been coerced or induced by anything said or done by persons in authority. The rationale appears to be that a confession obtained involuntarily can not be relied upon for the truth of its contents. The court’s dilemma was succinctly stated by Gibbs J in Driscoll v The Queen, who said that, ‘it is very common for an accused person to deny that he made an oral confession which police witnesses swear that he...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Law of Criminal Evidence

...Law of Criminal Evidence Question What are the potential legal consequences of Imtiaz making no comments in his police interview? Answer: There is often an argument in legal circles to count on silence of accused as a sign of guilt because he is supposed to provide reasons and defense arguments for every question raised during pre-trail investigation. In our question we will deal with the same issue. Is there any reason other than guilt for Imtiaz to keep his silence during pre-trail period? There might be a number of reasons to keep silence during pre-trail period besides guilt. Some of these may be as follow: 1- a negative and distrustful attitude toward police; 2- protection of other people or facts...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal Evidence Law - Evidential and Legal Burden

...Criminal Evidence Law - Evidential and Legal Burden Altin and William have been charged with the murder of Denzil on the basis of joint enterprise. Under the doctrine, two or more criminal suspects could be charged for colluding in the commission of a crime. It is important for the prosecution to prove that the accused were in action together, failure to which both may be acquitted by the court. Owing to seriousness of the criminal proceedings for murder, the prosecution and the defence have burdens of evidence which they must shoulder in proving their respective cases. Evidential Burden Evidential burden is one of the obligations of pre-trial chamber that must be fulfilled before criminal proceedings can begin. In this case... to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Law of evidence

...Law of Evidence Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Discussion 3 Conclusion 5 References 6 Introduction Law and justice are considered important elements in the creation of an ideal society. Unlike law and justice, the criminal activity is also considered a vital factor accountable for breaking the sound harmony in a society. To maintain harmony and balance between negative and positive activities, people need to stay focus regarding their activity. In this context, law and justice has been playing a guidance role for advising the people to act in accordance with several standards and legislations1. The objective of the essay is to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Evidence Law for FREE!

Contact Us