The Fourth Crusade - Essay Example

Fourth Crusade - Introduction The Fourth Crusade is described as one of the most important of all the major crusades. It is also one of the most complex and certainly one that is easily misunderstood, or at least is often understood in much too simplistic a manner. After the failure of the Third Crusade, there was little interest in Europe for another crusade against the Muslims. The Fourth Crusade was the last of the major crusades to be directed by the Papacy, before the Popes lost much of their power to the Holy Roman Empire and other secular monarchs. The later crusades were directed by individual monarchs, and even the Fourth quickly fell out of Papal control. [The crusades. New York: Cosmopolitan book corporation, 1929.] Pope Innocent III The mission of beginning a new crusade had become a life-task to Pope Innocent III. After the death of Richard the Lionheart, the Pope lost all hope in getting a trustworthy monarch to lead the holy war. POPE INNOCENT III [The art by Tintoretto (the original painting is in color), p. 370] Almost immediately upon being elected pope, Innocent III decided that the papacy itself should assume the leadership of the next Crusade. He issued his crusading letter in August of 1198, sending it to all the archbishops of the West. He directed the call to arms not to kings and emperors, but to counts and barons and even to cities. The archbishops and bishops of the Church were likewise to contribute soldiers, or an equivalent amount in money.["The Fourth Crusade ", Vol 3:1, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania] In 1198 he called for a new Crusade, which was largely ignored among European leaders. The Germans were struggling against Papal power, and England and France were still engaged in warfare against each other. The tone of the encyclical makes it clear that Innocent believed the Church itself was the true leader of the Crusades. Even so, he wrote separately to the kings of France and England, ordering them to cease their war. Not, you will note, that they should go on crusade themselves, but only that their quarrel should not interfere with the raising of troops and money for the Crusade. He likewise sent a papal legate to try to persuade Genoa and Pisa to make a truce between them, for much the same reasons, except that he wanted the Pisans and Genoese to participate in the Crusade.However, due to the preaching of Fulk of Neuilly, a crusading army was finally organized at a tournament held at Ecry by Count Thibaud of Champagne in 1199. Thibaud was elected leader, but he died in 1200 and was replaced by an Italian count, Boniface of Montferrat. Boniface and the other leaders sent envoys to Venice, Genoa, and other city-states to negotiate a contract for transport to Egypt, the object of their crusade; one of the envoys was the historian Geoffrey of Villehardouin. [Donald Queller: The Fourth Crusade, and bibliography in Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Crusades.] Preparation for the Crusade Genoa was uninterested but Venice agreed to transport 33,500 crusaders (as well as 4,500 horses), a very ambitious number. This agreement required a full year of preparation on the part of the city of Venice to build numerous ships and train the sailors that would man them, all the while curtailing the city's commercial activities. The majority of the crusading army that set out from Venice in October 1202 originated from areas within France. It included men from Blois, Champagne, Amiens, Saint-Pol, the Ile-de-France and Burgundy. However, several other regions of Europe sent substantial contingents as well, such as count Flanders and Marquis Boniface of Montferrat from northern Italy. Other notable groups came from the German Empire, including the men under Bishop Martin of Pairis and Bishop Conrad of Halberstadt together in alliance with the Venetian soldiers and sailors led by the Doge Enrico Dandolo.[ Queller, Donald E. "The Fourth Crusade: The Neglected Majority] Attack on Zara Since there was no binding agreement amongst the crusaders that all should sail from Venice, many chose to sail from other ports, particularly Flanders, Marseilles, and Genoa. By 1201 the crusader army was collected at Venice, though with far fewer troops than expected. The Venetians, under the aged and possibly blind doge Enrico Dandolo, would not let the crusaders leave without being paid the full amount agreed to originally of 85,000 silver marks, but the crusaders could only pay some 51,000, and that only by reducing themselves to extreme poverty. The Venetians barricaded them on the island of Lido until they could decide what to do with them. [The capture of Zara. Old French Translation] Dandolo and the Venetians succeeded in turning the crusading movement to their own purposes. Dandolo, who made a very public show of joining the crusade during a ceremony in the church of San Marco di Venezia, proposed that the crusaders could pay their debts by attacking the port of Zara in Dalmatia (essentially an independent community which recognized King Emeric of Hungary as a protector, and which was previously ruled by Venice; now Zadar in Croatia). The Hungarian king Emeric was Catholic and had himself "taken the cross", meaning he too had agreed to join the crusade (though this was mostly for political reasons). Many of the crusaders were opposed to this, and some, including a force led by the elder Simon de Montfort, refused to participate altogether and returned home. While the papal representative to the crusade, Peter Cardinal Capuano, endorsed the move as necessary to prevent the crusade's complete failure, Pope Innocent was alarmed at this development and wrote a letter to the crusade leadership threatening excommunication; this letter was concealed from the bulk of the army and the attack proceeded. The citizens of Zara made reference to the fact that they were fellow Catholics by hanging banners marked with crosses from their windows and the walls of the city, but nevertheless the city fell after a brief siege. Both the Venetians and the crusaders were immediately excommunicated for this by Innocent III. Towards Constantinople Boniface, meanwhile, had left the fleet before it sailed from Venice, and had visited his cousin Philip of Swabia. The reasons for his visit are a matter of debate; he may have realized the Venetians' plans and left to avoid excommunication, or he may have wanted to meet with Byzantine Prince Alexius Angelus, Philip's brother-in-law and the son of the recently deposed Byzantine emperor Isaac II. Alexius had fled to Philip when his father was overthrown in 1195, but it is unknown whether or not Boniface knew he was at Philip's court. In any case, if the Crusaders would sail to Constantinople and topple the reigning emperor, Alexius would place the Byzantine church in submission to Rome, pay the Crusaders an enormous sum, and join the Crusade to Egypt (now the centre of Muslim power in the Levant) with a large army. [Geoffrey de Villehardouin ,Memoirs or Chronicle of The Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople] It was a tempting offer for an enterprise that was short on funds. Greco-Latin relationships had been complex since the Great Schism of 1054. Following a savage event in Constantinople in 1181, a large number of Venetian merchants were attacked and deported during anti-Latin riots. In another stressful event during the Second Crusade, part of the crusading armies launched an attack on Constantinople. In response, the Greeks cut off supplies to the crusaders and betrayed them to the Turks. However, the Byzantine Prince's proposal involved his restoration to the Roman throne, and not the sack of his capital city. The Crusade leaders eventually accepted it, but a great many of the rank and file wanted nothing to do with the proposal, and many deserted. Alexius returned with Boniface to rejoin the fleet at Corfu after it sailed from Zara. They arrived at Constantinople in late June, 1203. [10 Queller, Donald E. The Fourth Crusade: the conquest of Constantinople] The Crusaders' initial motive was to restore Isaac II to the Byzantine throne so that they could later receive the support that they were promised. Conon of Bethune delivered this message to the Lombard envoy who was sent by Alexius III. . [10 Queller, Donald E.The Fourth Crusade: the conquest of Constantinople]. After the Crusaders attacked the northeastern corner of the city and then set a destructive fire, the citizens of Constantinople turned against Alexius III, who then fled. The Byzantine prince was elevated to the throne as Alexius IV along with his blind father, Isaac II. The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugne Delacroix, 1840 Alexius IV realised that his promises were hard to keep, as Alexius III had managed to take a large amount of money with him, and the empire was short on funds. At that point he ordered the destruction and melting of valuable Byzantine and Roman icons in order to extract gold and silver. In the eyes of all Greeks who knew of this decision, it was a shocking sign of desperation and weak leadership, which deserved to be punished by God. The Byzantine historian Nicetas Choniates characterised it as the turning point towards the decline of the "Romaic state" (as Greeks called their Empire). Thus Alexius IV had to deal with the growing hatred by the citizens of Constantinople for the "Latins" and vice versa. In fear of his life, the co-emperor asked from the crusaders to renew their contract for another six months (until April 1204). [Geoffrey de Villehardouin ,Memoirs or Chronicle of The Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople] Nevertheless there was still fighting in the city, and during an attack by the crusaders on a mosque (August 1203), which was defended by a combined Muslim and Greek opposition. On a second attempt of the Venetians to set up a wall of fire to aid their escape, they instigated the "Great Fire", in which a large part of Constantinople was burned down. Opposition to Alexius IV grew, and one of his courtiers, Alexius Ducas (nicknamed 'Murtzuphlos' because of his thick eyebrows), soon overthrew him and had him strangled to death. Alexius Ducas took the throne himself as Alexius V; Isaac died soon afterwards, probably naturally. The Crusaders and Venetians, incensed at the murder of their supposed patron, attacked the city once more in 1204. On the 8th of April, Alexius V's army put up a strong resistance which did much to discourage the Crusaders. The Greeks pushed enormous projectiles onto the enemy siege engines shattering many of them. A serious hindrance to the crusaders was bad weather conditions. Wind blew from the shore and prevented most of the ships from drawing close enough to the walls to launch an assault. Only five of the Greek towers were actually engaged and none of these could be secured; by mid-afternoon it was evident that the attack had failed. The clergy discussed the situation amongst themselves and settled upon the message they wished to spread through the demoralised army. They had to convince the men that the events of 9 April were not God's judgement on a sinful enterprise: the campaign they argued was righteous and with proper belief it would succeed. [Queller, Donald E. "The Fourth Crusade: The Neglected Majority." ] The concept of God testing the determination of the crusaders through temporary setbacks was a familiar means for the clergy to explain failure in the course of a campaign. The clergy's message was designed to reassure and encourage the crusaders. Their argument that the attack on Constantinople was spiritual just revolved around two themes. First, the Greeks were traitors and murderers since they had killed their rightful lord, Alexius IV. The churchmen used inflammatory language and claimed that "the Greeks were worse than the Jews", and they invoked the authority of God and the pope to take action. To introduce the Jews (supposedly the killers of Christ) as a point of comparison indicates how strongly the clergy wished to convince their audience of Murtzuphlus' evil. Although Innocent III had again warned them not to attack, the papal letter was suppressed by the clergy, and the crusaders prepared for their own attack, while the Venetians attacked from the sea; Alexius V's army stayed in the city to fight, along with the imperial bodyguard, the Varangians, but Alexius V himself fled during the night. Final capture of Constantinople On the 13th of April, weather conditions came finally to the side of the crusaders. A strong northern wind aided the Venetian ships to come close to the wall, and after a short battle approximately 70 Western soldiers managed to enter the city. [The Sack of Constantinople by Nicetas Choniates was translated by D. C. Munro, Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History] Some crusaders were eventually able to knock holes in the walls, small enough for a few knights at a time to crawl through; the Venetians were also successful at scaling the walls from the sea, though there was extremely bloody fighting with the Varangians. The crusaders captured the Blachernae section of the city in the northwest and used it as a base to attack the rest of the city, but while attempting to defend themselves with a wall of fire, they ended up burning down even more of the city than they had the first time. Eventually, the crusaders took the city on the 13th of April. The crusaders inflicted a horrible and savage sacking on Constantinople for three days, during which many ancient works of art were stolen or destroyed. Many important medieval Greek works were lost during the sack of the city. Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication, the Crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated the city's holy sanctuaries, destroying, defiling, or stealing all they could lay hands on. Many also broke their vows to respect the women of Constantinople and assaulted them. When Innocent III heard of the conduct of his pilgrims, he was filled with shame and strongly rebuked them. [The Sack of Constantinople by Nicetas Choniates was translated by D. C. Munro, Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History] According to a prearranged treaty, the empire was apportioned between Venice and the Crusade's leaders, and the Latin Empire at Constantinople was established. Boniface was not elected as the new emperor, although the citizens seemed to consider him as such; the Venetians thought he had too many connections with the former empire because of his brother's land holdings, and instead placed Baldwin of Flanders on the throne. Boniface went on to found the Kingdom of Thessalonica, a vassal state of the new Latin Empire. The Venetians also founded the Duchy of the Archipelago in the Aegean Sea. [Constantpole, Geoffry de Villehardouin: Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople, trans. Frank T. Marzials] Meanwhile, Byzantine refugees founded their own successor states, the most notable of these being the Empire of Nicaea under Theodore Lascaris (a relative of Alexius III), the Empire of Trebizond, and the Despotate of Epirus. Outcome Of The Constantinople Attack The belief that the conquest of Constantinople would help Crusading efforts was a mirage. Indeed, the opposite was true, for the unstable Latin empire siphoned off much of Europe's Crusading energy. The legacy of the Fourth Crusade was the deep sense of betrayal the Latins had instilled in their Greek coreligionists. With the events of 1204, the schism between the Catholic West and Orthodox East was complete. As an epilogue to the event, Pope Innocent III, the man who had launched the expedition, thundered against the crusaders thus: "You vowed to liberate the Holy Land but you rashly turned away from the purity of your vow when you took up arms not against Saracens but Christians The Greek Church has seen in the Latins nothing other than an example of affliction and the works of Hell, so that now it rightly detests them more than dogs".[Constantpole, Geoffry de Villehardouin: Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople, trans. Frank T. Marzials] The Latin Empire was soon faced with a great number of enemies, which the crusaders had not taken into account. Besides the individual Byzantine Greek states in Epirus and Nicaea, the Empire received great pressure from the Seljuk and Bulgarian Kingdoms. The Greek states were fighting for supremacy against both Latins and each other. Almost every Greek and Latin protagonist of the event was killed shortly after. Murtzuphlus' betrayal by Alexius III, led to his capture by the Latins and his execution at Constantinople. Not long after, Alexius III was himself captured by Boniface and sent to exile in Southern Italy. Boniface was eventually defeated by Ducas, the despot of Epirus and a relative of Murzuphlus, and the Kingdom of Thessalonica was restored to Byzantine rule. [Edgar McNeal and Robert Lee Wolff, The Fourth Crusade, in A History of the Crusades] One year after the conquest of the city, Latin emperor Baldwin IX of Flanders - the most notable and respected of the Latin rulers - was defeated in the battle at Adrianopolis on 14th April 1205 , tortured and executed by the Bulgarian tsar Kaloyan. In 1224 Boniface lost Thessalonica to the Greeks of Epirus and his head was sent to Bulgarian court. Various Latin-French lordships throughout Greece - in particular, the duchy of Athens and the principality of the Morea - did provide cultural contacts with western Europe and promoted the study of Greek. There was also a French impact on Greece. Notably, a collection of laws, the Assises de Romanie (Assizes of Romania), was produced. The Chronicle of the Morea appeared in both French and Greek (and later Aragonese) versions. Impressive remains of Crusader castles and Gothic churches can still be seen in Greece. Nevertheless, the Latin empire always rested on shaky foundations. The city was re-captured by the Greeks under Michael VIII Palaeologus in 1261, and commerce with Venice was re-established. [GENERAL HISTORIES OF THE CRUSADES 05 Bercovici, Konrad.The crusades. New York] In an ironic series of events, during the middle of the 15th century, the Latin Church tried to organise a crusade which aimed at the restoration of the Byzantine Empire which was gradually being torn down by the Ottoman Turks. The attempt however failed, as the vast majority of the Byzantines refused to unite the Churches. In a way, Greeks thought that the Byzantine civilisation which was centered at the Orthodox faith, would be more secure under Ottoman rule, and preferred to sacrifice their political freedom in order to preserve their religious one. In the late 14th and early 15th century, two kinds of crusades were finally organised by the Kingdoms of Hungary, Poland, Romania and Serbia. Both of them were checked and crushed by the mighty Ottoman Empire, which by that time had acquired the status of a world power. During the Ottoman siege of the Constantinople in 1453, a significant band of Venetian and Genoese knights died in the defence of the city. [Geoffry de Villehardouin: Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople, trans. Frank T. Marzials] Fourth crusade in all reality could not complete the mission for which it was started, rather it deviated from the actual cause.Eight hundred years later, and Pope John Paul II twice expressed sorrow for the events of the Fourth Crusade. In 2001, he wrote to Christodoulos, Archbishop of Athens, saying "It is tragic that the assailants, who set out to secure free access for Christians to the Holy Land, turned against their brothers in the faith. The fact that they were Latin Christians fills Catholics with deep regret." In 2004, while Bartholomew I, Patriarch of Constantinople, was visiting the Vatican, John Paul II said "How can we not share, at a distance of eight centuries, the pain and disgust." As Jonathan Phillips writes in his 2004 book The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople, this was "an extraordinary statement - an apology to the Greek Orthodox Church for the terrible slaughter perpetrated by the warriors of the Fourth Crusade" (intro., xiii). Sources GENERAL HISTORIES OF THE CRUSADES 05 Bercovici, Konrad. The crusades. New York: Cosmopolitan book corporation, 1929. D 157 .B4 "The Fourth Crusade ", Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History, Vol 3:1, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, [n.d.] 189), 1-18 Donald Queller: The Fourth Crusade, and bibliography in Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Crusades. 1997 Queller, Donald E. "The Fourth Crusade: The Neglected Majority." Speculum. 49 (1974) The capture of Zara. Villehardouin, ch. xvii-xviii, Nos. 8o-84, 86. Old French. Geoffry de Villehardouin: Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and The Conquest of Constantinople, trans. Frank T. Marzials, (London: J.M. Dent, 1908), p. 56 10 Queller, Donald E.The Fourth Crusade: the conquest of Constantinople, 1201-1204. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977. D 164 .Q38 Geoffrey de Villehardouin [b.c.1160-d.c.1213]: Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and the Conquest of Constantinople, trans. Frank T. Marzials, (London: J.M. Dent, 1908) The Sack of Constantinople by Nicetas Choniates was translated by D. C. Munro, Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History, Series 1, Vol 3:1 (rev. ed.) (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1912), 15-16. Picture Sources The image of Innocent III is detail of a picture is from An Outline of Christianity: The Story of Our Civilization, Vol. II (New York: Bethlehem Publishers, Inc., 1926), p. 210. The art by Tintoretto (the original painting is in color), p. 370 WWW.Metmuseum.Org/toah/hy/crus Read More