Government Treatment of Its Citizens after an Attack of the Country - Essay Example

Alan Schlosser, legal director of the ACLU said discriminating against non-citizen airport screeners would not make us safer or more secure. In fact, it will certainly decrease air travel security by eliminating much of the experienced and trained workforce. This issue was to discriminate immigrants but it was debated out. American human rights law uses much the same terminology to recognize these and a few additional rights of noncitizens. A bill of rights for inspiration and guidance was passed on with the notion that all persons, whatever their legal status, have basic rights, and should be treated equally.

Eleven days after the terrorist attack, the congress passed the air transportation safety and stabilization Act to protect air carriers from tort lawsuits against the airlines at their pre-existing liability insurance limits. The act established the September 11th compensation fund of 2001 in which victims of the attacks could opt to waive all federal and state tort claims and receive administrative relief through a predetermined formula, under the discretion of the fund administrator. (James, 1970)In centrally, Fifty-five years ago in August, the U.

S dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagaski.In that blinding flash of light during the second world war, the fate of hundreds of thousands of japans citizens was sealed. In less than a month's time, these citizens were to become the victims of this new atomic force irrespective of well-documented peace feelers put out by high ranking Japanese officials in the months before the bombing. These officials indicated numerous times to multiple sources in the international diplomatic community that surrender would be acceptable on condition that the empire's position could be maintained.

As President Harry S Truman ate lunch on the Augusta, returning home from his meeting at Potsdam with British Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill and USSR premier, he was given the news of the bombing of Hiroshima. Elated, he told the group of sailors around him, this is the greatest thing in history. The cause for his celebration was the incineration of Hiroshima's infrastructure and tens of thousands of its inhabitants. He never even-minded about the lives of those people but instead, he celebrated.

According to the August 6 diary entry of the director of the Hiroshima communications hospital, Hiroshima was no longer a city, but a burned over the prairie. To the east and to the west everything was flattened. The distant mountains seemed nearer than I could ever remember. How small Hiroshima was with its houses gone and its residents. The description of the human toll of the bombings is almost too horrible to comprehend. The residents had no hair because their hairs were burned, and at a glance, you couldn't tell whether you were looking at them from the front or from the back Surprisingly enough, Truman was so unmoved by the devastation in Hiroshima that he gave the order august 9 for Nagasaki to be bombed Once this goal was accomplished, on august 10, Truman ordered an end to the atomic bombing of Japan.

The thought of wiping out another 100,000 people was too horrible. The exact number of people who were murdered by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, the Hiroshima international council for health care of the radiation exposed estimates the population of Hiroshima at the time of the bombing to have been between 340,000 and 350,000 people.Japan's defense minister made a statement that the US atom bomb attacks in World War II were inevitable His comments had outraged bomb survivors and sparked calls from opposition parties for his dismissal, which shows that he actually lacked respect for the victims of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

(James, 1970)The Japanese government ignored the feelings of its citizens by refusing to even consider apologizing, leave alone compensating the victims; they refused to accept the responsibility for the rape of comfort women. This is, of course, a bad thing to the residents of that country. If the good people of Nagasaki would like their feelings to be considered, they would mostly have greater success if they were seen as people who considered the feelings of others themselves. Perhaps they should start by letting their national government know they would like Japan to acknowledge and apologize for crimes committed by soldiers of this country in international wars.

It would be a good starting point. (James, 1970)ConclusionEvery citizen of a given country has the right to be protected by the government of that country in times of attacks. It is the right of that country to ensure that in case of attacks, people are compensated and apologize for incidence and for the losses incurred but not to disrespect them as though they are not members of that country.