Nobody downloaded yet

Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Learning - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
From a philosophical perspective, the idea of learning can fall under the heading of epistemology, which refers to the study of the origin, nature, limits, and methods of knowledge.1 How can we know How can we learn something new What is the source of knowledge The complexity of how humans learn is illustrated in the following excerpt from Plato's Meno (427-347 B.C.):
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98% of users find it useful
Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Learning
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Learning"

Download file to see previous pages Actually, there are two positions on the origin of knowledge and its relationship to the environment: rationalism and empiricism. In varying degrees these positions are recognizable in our present learning theories. Rationalism is connected with the idea that knowledge derives from reason without aid of the senses. The distinction between mind and matter, which figures prominently in rationalist views of human knowledge, can be traced to Plato, who distinguished knowledge acquired via the senses from that gained by reason.3 Plato believed that things (e.g., houses, trees) are revealed to people via the senses, whereas individuals acquire ideas by reasoning or thinking about what they know. People have ideas about the world, and they learn (discover) these ideas by reflecting upon them. Reason is the highest mental faculty, because through reason people learn abstract ideas. The true nature of houses and trees can be known only by reflecting upon the ideas of houses and trees.4
Plato escaped the dilemma in Meno by assuming that true knowledge, or the knowledge of ideas, is innate and is brought into awareness through reflection. Learning is recalling what exists in the mind. Information acquired with the senses by observing, listening, tasting, smelling, or touching constitutes raw materials rather than ideas. The mind is innately structured to reason and provide meaning to incoming sensory information. On the other hand, empiricism refers to the idea that experience is the only source of knowledge. This position derives from Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), who was Plato's student and successor. Aristotle drew no sharp distinction between mind and matter. The external world is the basis for human sense impressions, which in turn are interpreted as lawful (consistent, unchanging) by the mind. The laws of nature cannot be discovered through sensory impressions. Rather, they are discovered through reason as the mind takes in data from the environment. Unlike Plato, Aristotle believed that ideas do not exist independently of the external world. The latter is the source of all knowledge.5
However, it is on the emphasis of the idea of the Self, as something primary in experience and providing the basis of ontology, may be said to be the keynote of modern as contrasted with ancient and medieval philosophy. It was this that Descartes had the merit of being the first to bring into prominence, and thereby of making "the greatest philosophical discovery since the age of Plato and Aristotle".6
More likely, the rationalist doctrine is evident in the writings of Ren Descartes (1596-1650), a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes employed doubt as a method of inquiry. By doubting, he arrived at conclusions that were absolute truths and not subject to doubt. The fact that he could doubt led him to believe that the mind (thought) exists, as reflected in his dictum, "I think, therefore I am." Through deductive reasoning from general premises to specific instances, he proved that God exists and concluded that ideas arrived at through reason must be true. The major premise "whatever thinks exists" might be learned from our own case. One possibility is that our own case serves as a single piece of evidence that supports the premise by inductive enumeration, in the way that an observer might try to form a generalization ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Essay”, n.d.)
Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Essay. Retrieved from
(Plato and Descartes: Comparing Their Thoughts on Knowledge and Essay)
Plato and Descartes: Comparing Their Thoughts on Knowledge and Essay.
“Plato and Descartes: Comparing Their Thoughts on Knowledge and Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Theories of Knowledge: Socrates Meets Descartes
Rene Descartes was also analytical focusing on mathematics and was one of the key figures leading the Scientific Revolution. Because these two philosophers have had such as prominent role as founding fathers of philosophy, Peter Kreeft highlights how a modern and classical philosopher can combine ideas to become the two primary influences that are more highly regarded than any other philosophical mind.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Essay : Plato, Descartes, and The Matrix
Same like the prisoners in the cave, the hero does not realize he is a prisoner. Both the parties are unaware of the reality and are living under a false perception. He like the people in the cave is born under bondage where he cannot smell or taste or touch.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Plato, Descartes, and The Matrix
Nevertheless, although the three sources attempt to ask analogous questions, it is essentially their manner of answering these questions that differentiate them from each other. Plato examines the notion that the real world represents an illusion within the allegory of the cave presented in The Republic.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Comparing the ideas of Plato and Aristotle
Plato’s ideal city comprised of four virtues that included moderation, courage, wisdom and justice. Aristotle, on the other hand, was a Greek philosopher, as well as, a
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Plato, Descartes, and Freud's Take on
The three theorists and theories included are: Plato’s Divided Line Theory, Descartes Method of Doubt, and Freud’s Psychoanalysis. The similarities and differences are demonstrated, as well as the reasoning that was used in creating each theory. Plato, Descartes, and Freud’s Take on the Posture of Reason Philosophy was birthed out of the innate longing of human nature to understand the interworking of human thought, action, and purpose.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Plato and Descartes on the Soul
The issue of the soul has always been a center of interest not only to the early philosopher but still is controversial until this time because as Glaucon had been surprised by Socrates’ statement, “Haven’t your realized that our soul is immortal and never destroyed?
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Plato, St.Thomas, Descartes
This also creates a need of a power which is practiced by the substance of human person in authority. Some of clarification by philosophers or theologians has made it evident that human person can be defined as a relationship between mind and body or soul and body.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Plato through Descartes: Main Problems of Philosophy
It therefore becomes very difficult to have a clear cut difference between Socrates philosophies and Plato’s. The Ontological dualism is one of the philosophies presented by Plato. The philosophy is simply a theory of the ideas. Ontologically speaking, the ideas herein do not only include the real objects but rather, on an epistemological speaking, they comprise authentically objects of knowledge.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Plato and Descartes theories
They therefore came up with a rationalistic theory of knowledge which declares that absolutely certain knowledge cannot be acquired through sense experience but
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Dualism by Plato and Descartes
Descarte’s Cartesian dualism separates mind from the soul. For Descartes, a soul is what animates the body and the mind’s job is to think and imagine. Such is why he is being famous of the adage “I think, therefore I am”. Plato differs from Descartes in a manner that he held that soul can think better when it is separated from the body.
1 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Plato and Descartes: Comparing their Thoughts on Knowledge and Learning for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us