We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Corportions Law in Australia - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Limited Liability can be defined as a shareholder's liability in a company which is limited to the value of his or her shareholding in the company. In a limited company, the liability of the members is limited to the amount remaining unpaid on the shares (The ICFAI University, 2005)…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Corportions Law in Australia

Download file to see previous pages... A Company is a distinct legal entity whereas a partnership firm in not distinct from the several persons who compose it (The ICFAI University, 2005). When it comes to issue of liability, a partner's liability is always unlimited whereas that of shareholder may be limited either by shares or by guarantee. The main difference between a partnership and a limited company is that the liability of a company's shareholders is limited to the amount of the unpaid amount on the shares that they own2 (Complete Business Services Ltd). Partners on the other hand, can not restrict their liability i.e. as they have an unlimited liability and therefore can be held personally responsible for any unpaid debts the partnership incurs.
In a partnership firm, partners are joint and severally liable for partnership debts. Thus if one partner engages in an activity which results in large debts, all partners, regardless of whether or not they had prior knowledge of the activities would be equally liable to make good any shortfall in funds from their personal assets. But this is not the case with a company. As discussed earlier, the liability of the participants in a company is limited to the amount of shares that are held by them in the company.
The case of Salomon vs. Salomon & Co. Ltd., took place in the year 1879. ...
y purchased the business of Salomon for 39,000, and the purchase consideration was paid in terms of debentures worth 10,000 conferring a charge over the company's assets, and 20,000 shares of 1 each fully paid-up and the balance amount in cash. The company in less than one year ran into difficulties and liquidation proceedings commenced. The assets of the company were not even sufficient to discharge the debentures and nothing was left for the unsecured creditors. The unsecured creditors contended that though incorporated under the Act, the company never had an independent existence; it was in fact an alter-ego of Salomon, the other directors being his sons under his control.
It was held by the House of Lords that "the company had been validly constituted since the Act only required seven members holding at least one share each. It said that nothing about their being independent, or that there should be anything like a balance of power in the constitution of the company3 (Ask Me Help Desk). The company is different person at law and though it may be that after incorporation the business is precisely the same as before, the same persons are managers, and the same hands receive the profits, the company is not, in law their agent or trustee. Hence, the business belonged to the company and not to Salomon."
The court observed that the company was a separate person, a separate body altogether different from the shareholders and the transfer was as much as conveyance, a transfer of property, as if the shareholders had been totally different persons.
It can be seen from the proceedings of the above discussed case that a company is given a distinct legal entity in comparison to the individuals who are managing the affairs of the company. This provides a 'veil' for ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Law on Torts in Australia
Instead they should have willingly vacated the land and if the need arouse return back later with a warrant allowing them to search the property forcefully in the event that Tom refused them to do so1. The Plaintiff, Tom could claim to have suffered personal injury on his person when the defendant, officer Falcon laid his hand on Tom’s shoulder (McNamara v Duncan (1971) 26 ALR 584, 5872 (Fox J).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Essay on Employment Law in Australia
Such protocols should be followed when dismissing the employee for the sake of fairness. Grounds for dismissal may be justifiable in the view of the employer but the procedure that they adopt may not be appropriate (Hardy & Butler, 2011). An employer may dismiss an employee without undertaking proper investigations in order to understand the exact nature of the perceived misconduct.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Business Law in Australia
This is because Bob and Sally, along with other customers, have not been informed of the sudden changes in the policy of the company according to which the offer to season's ticket has been revoked. Further, the advertisement did not provide or spoke of any deadlines or that the offer was subject to any sudden changes.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Corporations Law in Australia
If the organisation is a limited liability organisation, this means that in case of any losses or debts, the investors are only responsible for their investments, and are not liable to any law suits related to or responsibility towards the corporation as a whole and its losses or debts (Gillhams Solicitors).
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Australia taxation law
This website contains all forms required, legal ramifications and case law, and calculators used to complete calculations required in different portions of the tax forms (such as depreciation calculations.) The success of this case study can be measured by what tools were used to identify and calculate requirements and the computation of the final tax levied.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Business Law in Australia Essay
A privilege or liberty of yesterday may become a duty today for the law of negligence is consistently influenced and transformed by social, economic and political considerations. The general principle of forseability ad proximity applicable in solving cases presenting the existence or otherwise of a new duty situation was laid down by LORD ATKIN in the celebrated case of Donoghue V.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Law: Australia : Equity & Trusts - see question below
In the laws of natural justice, the doctrine of Quic quid plantatur solo solo cedit- “anything attached to the land belongs to the land” was what prevailed. This was viewed as unfair to a person
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
Evidence Law - Victoria (Australia) Legal Case Commentary
Implicit in the doctrine of free choice is a requirement that the confession statement is obtained by proper means in that the suspect has not been coerced or induced by anything said or done by persons in authority.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Contract Law (Australia)
“When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.” “When at the desire of the promisor, the promise or any other person
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Just like the United States, the White skinned inhabitants of Australia who are the posted people for who an Australian is are not the original settlers in the land. While the Americans had to deal with the Native Americans
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Corportions Law in Australia for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us