Business Law - criminal charges - Essay Example

Bussiness Law August 30, 2006 I. a. Neither ABC nor XYZ could file criminal charges against the other in X. It is possible that criminal charges could be filed against ABC, if they were to be criminally libel for resulting deaths or injuries in state Z. Even though the corporation owning the factory in Z resides in X, criminal charges would not be filed in state X, owing to the fact that no crime was committed there. (Canada) ABC could not file criminal charges against XYZ in X, as XYZ does not exist in X, but Y instead.b. Both of them could conceivably have grounds to press criminal charges in state y.

It is possible that corporation ABC could press criminal charges against XYZ in y if they were to argue a fraudulent intent regarding XYZ's suit to rescind their joint venture was actually to avoid liability for possible negligence suits in state z. (Joint Venture) XYZ could counter that ABC had prior knowledge of inferior materials or safety standards in ABC's plant in state Z, thus compromising XYZ's investment. (Trade Law)c. Neither ABC or XYZ could file criminal charges in state z, however it is possible charges might be filed against ABC by third parties.d. Neither ABC nor XYZ could file criminal charges in state Q.

Neither corporation is empowered with the ability to file criminal charges. That would require an officer of the court empowered to do so. They could however present the necessary evidence to the court for charges to be filed.II.a. Neither ABC or XYZ would be filing a civil suit against the other in state X, as their agreement clearly states they will use the law of state Y. b. Both would suit each other in state y, as their joint venture establishes, unless the venture were rescinded, in which case they would each suit the other in the others state.

(Joint Venture)c. Neither ABC nor XYZ would be suing each other in state Z.d. Neither ABC nor XYZ would be suing each other in state Q. Works CitedOakwell Engineering v. Enernorth Industries (Canada, Court of Appeal File No. C43898, Superior Court File Nos. 04-CV-271121CM3 & 04-CV-274860 CM2). Retrieved August 30, 2006, from URL: http://uy.http3.net/Corrupted_Singapore_Regime_Judiciary.pdfCornell Law School LLI. Joint Venture Law. Retrieved August 29, 2006 from URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.

php/Joint_ventureCornell Law School LLI. International Trade. Retrieved August 29, 2006 from URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/International_trade