StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Hobbes and Locke - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Leviathan" (1651) proposes contractarianism and Sovereignty. Leviathan serves as a political metaphor, alluding to the Bible. It argues that an ideal commonwealth is best attained by a sovereign power, which has an absolute authority responsible for protecting the security and the common defense of the Commonwealth.
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Hobbes and Locke
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Hobbes and Locke"

"Leviathan" (1651) proposes contractarianism and Sovereignty. Leviathan serves as a political metaphor, alluding to the Bible. It argues that an ideal commonwealth is best attained by a sovereign power, which has an absolute authority responsible for protecting the security and the common defense of the Commonwealth.
In the First Part: Of Man, Hobbes' philosophy is built in the manner of a geometrical proof. He observes that the universe is a "plenum" filled with material bodies. The innate condition of mankind and the state of nature here is essentially brutal and it is a "war of every man against every man," (Hobbes, 79) in which one continually seeks to annihilate the other. Human beings naturally seek peace, and the best way to achieve peace is to construct the Leviathan through social contract. The Second Part: Of Commonwealth, shows the process of erecting the Leviathan by outlining the rights of sovereigns and subjects, and draws the legislative and civil mechanics of the commonwealth. He deduces twelve principals of the sovereign, proposes censorship of the press and the restriction of free speech rights for the promotion of order. The Third Part: Of the Christian Commonwealth, formulates the compatibility of Christian doctrine and the religious system of the Leviathan. He argues that though there is no God personally present in this world, even in the incarnation of Christ, there is a Prime Mover who intervenes in the world through the mediation of matter.Hobbes thus takes theological knowledge and reinterprets it to conform to his determination of natural facts and philosophical conclusions. The Fourth Part: Of the Kingdom of Darkness, engages in deflating false religious beliefs and argues that the political implementation of the Leviathanic state is necessary to achieve a secure Christian commonwealth. He denounces the idea that the Kingdom of God was the present Church and calls them deceivers who by their erroneous doctrines "disprepare" men "for the kingdom of God to come." (Hobbes, 378)
John Locke in his "Two Treaties of Government" (1689) recommends that the endeavor of a government should to provide liberty and security, but that the populace has a right to bring down the government when it fails to offer any.
John Locke provides an alternative version of the Hobbesian ideology and debates that the state of nature was happy and characterized by reason and tolerance. In Essay One, Chapter II, he maintains that the state of nature was ruled by equality and independence where none had a right to harm another's "life, health, liberty, or possessions" (Locke, Pg.107). In such a realm, Locke argues, the state was formed by a voluntary social contract where each was his own judge. Locke maintains that individuals living outside the natural law had no protection and that the state should be guided by the natural law. In Essay One: The False Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer, and His Followers, Are Detected and Overthrown, Locke attacks the views of Robert Filmer who had argued for an absolutist monarchy based upon the divine right policy. Locke denounces the doctrine of jury divino and negates Filmer's idea of mankind's primogeniture from Adam He advocates that no state could juxtapose upon the natural equality and freedom of man. In the Essay Two: Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government, Locke portrays the state of nature as one where individuals make judgements based upon the requirements of the law of nature. He asserts that the natural state of mankind is essentially anarchic. In contrast to Hobbes, who posited the state of nature as a hypothetical possibility, Locke shows that such a state did indeed exist. The second treatise also features Locke's views on conquest and slavery, property, representative government, and the right of revolution. Locke advocates the importance of the rights of property and maintains that each individual has a right to the product of his or her labor.
Works Cited
Hobbes, Thomas. "Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill." 1651, By Thomas of Malmesbury London, printed for Andrew Crooke, at the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church-yard, Prepared for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought, by Rod Hay, McMaster University History of Economic Thought Archive, September 2003, McMaster University Website, 24 June 2006. Locke, John. "Two Treatises Of Government by John Locke from The Works of John Locke." 1689, A New Edition, Corrected. In Ten Volumes. Vol. V. London: Printed for Thomas Tegg; W. Sharpe and Son; G. Offor; G. and J. Robinson; J. Evans and Co.: Also R. Griffin and Co. Glasgow; and J. Gumming, Dublin. 1823. Prepared by Rod Hay, for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought Archive, September 2003, McMaster University Website, 24 June 2006. . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Hobbes and Locke Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1505910-hobbes-and-locke
(Hobbes and Locke Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1505910-hobbes-and-locke.
“Hobbes and Locke Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1505910-hobbes-and-locke.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hobbes and Locke

Hobbes and Locke views on the State of Nature

...?Both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke argue that prior to formed societies, the meaning of the of nature was important to grasp. Hobbes argues that the state of nature is a 'war of all against all'. He maintains therefore, that societies are formed in order to protect themselves against each other because in a state of nature, all is chaos. Locke argues that in a state of nature, all individuals have a natural right to whatever it is they obtain, so long as they labour upon it. In a state of nature, all individuals have equal rights against eachother. The following will examine the state of nature in both philosophers, and in turn, it will be argued that Hobbes view of nature leads to a position that defends a strong sovereign or monarchy...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Hobbes and Locke on the Evolution of the Civil Society

... 23 June Hobbes and Locke on the Evolution of the “Civil Society” Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and his book Leviathan greatlyinfluenced political thought in the seventeenth century, by arguing for the importance of the “social contract” in achieving peace and civil unity. John Locke (1632-1704) and his work Two Treatises on Government (1690) is also a seminal work on political thought, because he stresses the precedence of civil society over the government. These political thinkers have similarities and differences in how the idea of Europe as a “Civil Society” changed over time. Their views are important for international political thought, because they influenced present international political economy theories and helped paved the debate...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

Comparing the differences of purpose of government according to Philosophers. (Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, and Locke)

... Purpose of Government according to Philosophers The purpose for which governments should exist has been a preoccupation of philosophers from the classical period to the modern societies. While Plato and Aristotle represent classical philosophers, Hobbes and Locke are a part of what is seen as modern philosophers. Some of the difficulties that society in the classical period faced are the same as what society experience today. For example, the question on whether to have a democratic, aristocratic, tyrannical or oligarchy was handled by in the classical period by Aristotle yet the same question still presents when discussing modern forms of governments. Thus, it is true to say that philosophers of classical period and modern philosophers...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper

...Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper In their works, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke explained the nature of power, of nature", and characterized "civil society" underlining the importance of state-church relations. (1) In his most prominent work "Leviathan", Thomas Hobbes explains the concept of the "state of nature". Thomas Hobbes supposed that the "state of nature" is especially evident in the exercise of power. So far as human beings are concerned the acquisition and exercise of power is inevitably connected with an agent's having some view of the good and an intention to bring it about. He explained that when all men lived without a strong power, they was in the state of war, and "such a war as is of every man against every man" (Hobbes...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke/pro John Locke

...Thomas Hobbes and John Locke stand out as two of the most prominent and influential of the political philosophers. Both are ified as social contract theorists but Hobbes, whose work predates Locke's by approximately one century, was the polar opposite of the latter. Indeed, it would hardly be an exaggeration were one to claim that the one's theory is the antithesis of the other's. The aforementioned is evidenced in the fact that both had very different notions of human nature and, accordingly, of the rationale behind the entry of citizens into a social contract, the implications of the said contracts and the rights of the populace versus the limits of government. Indeed, the differences between the two are such that Locke ultimately...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Compare and contrast the ideas about human nature in two theorists Hobbes and Locke

...Hobbes and Locke: Human Nature and Society 2009 Hobbes and Locke: Human Nature and Society John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both outstanding thinkers who studied human society and laws that governed the realm of social relations but their views on human nature, power and authority contrasted sharply. These contrasts manifested through a series of social, philosophic and political works produced by Hobbes and Locke throughout the 17th century. Despite certain similarities that were largely due to similar historic and intellectual context of the Enlightenment, the philosophers maintained dramatic differences in their views on social structure, political organization and the nature of human being. Hobbes did not share the recognized...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

Thus, in a social contract to which they voluntarily consented, they created the state for the purpose of promoting and preserving their natural rights to life, liberty and property.
It was John Locke who painted a picture of liberty of citizens and authority of government in tones which were far moderate than that of Thomas Hobbes. Men in a state of nature could make use of their perfect freedom for their own good, since they were reasonable men. To John Locke, men did not abuse their Liberty. They did not threaten the lives of their neighbors. He wrote:
Though this is a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license. The state of nature of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Comparing Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau

One of the key problems involved in the debate on justification of political authority is the balance between limitations imposed by any political authority and individual freedom. On the one hand, freedom is exceptionally important to the life of a person in many senses. On the other hand, an individual can not be allowed to act solely at his or her will: there must be certain rules for behavior. Establishing this balance between individual freedom and interests of the community is the key task of any state and government which acts like a stabilizer. In case this balance is in place, the highest level of individual freedom is achieved while the risk of falling into total anarchy is avoided (Popper, 1985).
According to Thomas...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Social Contract Theory Of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau

... The Social Contract of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Introduction The social contract is at theory that tries toexplain how the society originates as well as try to explain the presumed relationship between its members, how they acquire the responsibilities as well as their rights. It states that members of the society are accorded certain rights as a result of them giving up certain freedoms they can posses in the state of nature. The theory explains that the society enforces the rights and responsibilities that are borne by its members. Since these rights are not fixed and they are not natural, then it is possible for them to be altered should the society’s members decide to. It however states that exercising additional rights will entail...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

...The Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke The Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke hold different opinions on political authority. Locke believes that human beings are born free and equal; nature provides everyone with rights and governments are only formed to protect existing rights. This is different from Hobbes’ assumption that humankind is evil by nature and chaotic if left uncontrolled. Therefore, Hobbes advocates for absolute rule. Judging the two philosophers, the form of political authority that Locke favors is unrealistic. Hobbes believes that humankind is constantly faced by the threat of mayhem as everyone strives to satisfy their passions. As a result, formation...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Hobbes and Rousseau on the Creation of Political Authority

... Hobbes and Rousseau on the creation of political ity The social contract theory is a common concept used in many different fields such as philosophy, political science, economics and sociology. It basically suggests that there is a contract which exists between the state and the individuals who are part of the state regarding their individual rights and privileges which creates political authority for those who are to act as governors or administrators for a society. A social contract can also exist between a company/organization and its members or a social group and the participants of the group. The idea of a social contract has been developed and expanded greatly by philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes amongst...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

The Philosophy and Theories of John Locke

The ‘state of nature’ according to social contract theory describes the hypothetical condition of humanity before the state’s foundation and its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force (Wikipedia). The 17th and 18th-century thinkers believed that whatever good things one had in the ‘state of nature’ should not be lost when one entered into society. They even evaluated the government based on this condition. The citizens of New Orleans like everyone else had been living in the ‘state of nature’ and hence their sentiments and revolt against the government is natural when their expectations have not been met. Locke believed that in the state of nature, men mostly kept their promises....
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

The Characters Tyler and Jack in Fight Club and Calvin and Hobbes the Philosophers and the Cartoon Characters Based Upon Them

...The Characters Tyler and Jack In Fight Club And Calvin and Hobbes (The Philosophers and the Cartoon Characters Based Upon Them): A Comparison Analysis of literature in a creative way requires some seriousness of thought. Here it will be attempted to link excerpts from the script Fight Club and the philosophies of John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes. 

The major link between the two will be demonstrated through the ethical and moral scruples of the cartoon Calvin and Hobbes, which will be described further in detail later on herein. The characters in Fight Club are supposed to mirror Calvin and Hobbes, and Calvin and Hobbes are supposed to mirror the philosophers John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes. 

 One of the more amusing scenes...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Analysis of John Locke and Jeremy Bentham Phylosophy

John Locke spent six years there before he went on to Oxford in 1652 where he studied Logic, Metaphysics and Classical Languages. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1956 and continued in Oxford where he was successful in achieving his Master of Arts degree in 1658. It was after receiving this degree that he decided to study medicine and he came under the influence of renowned physician Thomas Sydenham. Locke later assumed the position of personal physician to Lord Ashley, who was known as one of the richest men in England at that time, and also Earl of Shaftesbury.

Locke's presence at Ashley’s home was more than that of a physician. After Lord Ashley became Earl of Shaftesbury and declared Lord Chancellor,...
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper

Comparison between Hobbes and Lockes Social Contract Theories

...Running head: Comparison between Hobbes’ and Locke’s Social Contract Theories Abstract Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were great philosophers in the 17th century during the civil war between the king and the monarchs against the parliamentarians over leadership and authority. These philosophers were famous social contract theorists, natural theorists and law theorists. In their social contract theories, Hobbes and Locke argue on how people should be governed, to what extent and whether being governed is actually necessary. They tried using the theories to create a compromise between the two parties. However, they argued it all differently and this created the differences between their arguments (Friend, 2004). In this paper, both contrast...
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper

Theory of the Social Contract by Hobbes, Rousseau, Smith and Kant

...Social Contract: Hobbes, Rousseau, Smith and Kant There never was such a thing as absolute justice, but only agreements made in mutual dealings amongmen in whatever places at various times providing against the infliction or suffering of harm. Epicurus Introduction The social contract is the primary agreement or contract that forms the basis of social order. As such it is a largely theoretical construct that explains the decision of human beings to surrender absolute autonomy to a government that maintains the rule of law. Although use of the term predates Rousseaus, The Social Contract (1762), it has become a fundamental term in political science and philosophy in the 250 years since its publication. The following brief discussion...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Comparison of Economic Theories Of Adam Smith and John Locke

...Economic and Social Analysis: Compare and Contrast Economic Theories Of Adam Smith and John Locke John Locke is a philosopher known for his contribution to the field of politics and economy. He is famous for the theory of property and the labour theory of value. John Locke’s labour theory of value disagrees with the economical thoughts of some of the historians who were interested with economics. The theory of property showed some relationship between labour and economic value. Locke’s idea of labour and value relates to his theory of supply and demand and the theory of market price. Economists argue that Locke provided a labour theory of value, which he substituted for his supply and demand theory of price in the short-run. The theories...
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment

Compare and contrast the importance of religion and secularism in the thought of Machiavelli, Locke, and Marx & Engels

...Comparison and contrast of the importance of religion and secularism Lecturer: The issue of religion and secularism has had a central part in many of the historical and political discourses. This is due to the fact that faith has played a significant role in formation of political organizations from the time in memorial. The paper seeks to compare the religious and secular view of philosophers, Machiavelli, John Locke and Marx and Engels. In the prince Machiavelli does not direct reference to religion or secularism because his view is the well being of the community and security. He does not give so much emphasis on morality in political actions. For him moral acts were just part of instrumental in achieving political expedience. So...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Leviathan Written by Thomas Hobbes

... Introduction Thomas Hobbes in an England born philosopher who much contributed to the modern philosophy in the 17th century. His main interest was in political philosophy, history, ethics and geometry. He contributed much to political philosophy with the main notable ideas being modern founder of the social contract tradition and also life in the state of nature is poor and short (Hobbes and Gaskin, 1998, p. 54) He also developed European fundamental liberal thoughts such as the rights of individual and equality nature of men. He developed political order that later led to the distinction between civil society and the state (Hobbes and Missner, 2008, p. 121). Hobbes...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

A Description Of Machiavellis, Hobbes, and Lockes Works

... Due: Thoughts of Modern and Ancient Philosophical Thinkers on Politics This essay will focus on bringing out the distinguishable thoughts of modern and ancient philosophical thinkers on politics in order to capture the different ideologies that arise from the different parties. Aristotle, one of the ancient Greek philosophical thinkers, political views mainly lie on the aspects of teleology, perfection, communism, rulership, and rule of reason. The works of modern philosophers such as Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke have challenged Aristotle’s ideologies by bringing out different aspects of a political society. It is important to note that these philosophers also held different political views. Therefore, this paper will focus on giving...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Hobbes and Locke for FREE!

Contact Us