Transtheoretical Model in Psychoanalysis - Essay Example

Running Head: TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL Transtheoretical Model of Transtheoretical Model Numerous trends in the function of advocating and psychoanalysis have persevered that tells that the Transtheoretical model has enjoyed much popularity in the alcohol and other drug field, though evidence supporting it is limited and there has been criticism and suggestions that it should be replaced. The style that has continued for a long time is the eclectic strategy to counseling system. Realistic selection of a most suited method has been linked with particular client propensities, amalgamations of theoretical application, and incorporation of any amount of therapy methods (Gaw & Beutler, 1993). Such a policy may have been commenced by advances in the classification of the equipotentiality of various explanations of client issues. Premature research proposed that a counselor's hypothetically based viewpoint in the area of alcohol and drugs about the source of a client's query were influential in creating revolution, apart from the actual satisfaction of the counselor's thinking (West, 2005). Moreover, consequent study has pointed out that the difference between the customer's faith and the analyst's message itself, rather than the accurate theoretically based substance of the message, is of major importance for client change. Researchers examined that the counselor's message itself allowed the user to observe the problem with a different angle that directed to efficient problem interpreting. In olden times, a few researchers and counselor instructors might have been more open to theoretical assimilation upon identifying a trend in practical searches that revealed comparatively small differences between therapeutic policies (Highlen & Hill, 1984). A significant peculiarity has been set between procedural eclecticism and theoretical incorporation. An eclectic strategy, exclusive of theoretical incorporation, tends to put down practitioners with a plan wanting in structure and practical trend. There is a lot to explore and perform for the structure that attains theoretical incorporation. (Prochaska, 1997) Researchers as well as theorists who proposed models that match with modern variations have documented the increasing trend in the direction of eclecticism. A methodical treatment selection was proposed in 1993 that reflects an individual's problem sternness and convolution, inspirational pain, confrontation power and handling style. The aspects that proposal drew awareness to are imperative for counselors to think about. The model may appear unclear and perplexing because the individuals have changeable measures of problems. (Gaw and Beutler, 1993) The aim of the article is to underline the role that the Transtheoretical Model of Change has played for practical eclecticism and theoretical incorporation. Another objective is to think about the intercession propositions of empirically resulting practices and phases of change. Transtheoretical Model Transtheoretical Model characterizes an experimentally derived chronological structure of general change that consists of multiple stages. This model is different from other counseling assumptions in that it was planned to present an amalgamative configuration to analysis practice. It was designed to combine various features of counseling without isolating application from theory. Transtheoretical Model also integrates a perceptive of the usual dynamic predispositions that individuals illustrate about self-change. In particular, it integrates what investigators have exposed about how a number of individuals, with problems usually seen in treatment, achieve required changes devoid of treatment (Tucker, 1995; Watson & Sher, 1998). This sort of invention of the model is imitative of the scientist-expert in that it was designed from a practically originated model of change. Transtheoretical model may be one solution to the recognized need of an incorporative and inclusive approach that various specialized people have shown an interest in accepting (Prochaska, 1997). Processes of Change The method of change is an initial element to the structure of Transtheoretical Model. Individuals endeavor a range of solutions to transform problematic philosophy, lackness in implementation, or objectionable affects. The courses of change have been recognized as the techniques in which individuals try to modify with or without treatment. Prochaska, Velicer, DiClemente, and Fava (1988) verified that a large scale of change through counseling could be credited to 10 valuably discrete processes of change. An individual's procedure of change has been functionally described and may be evaluated by means of Processes of Change Questionnaire, which consist of 40-items (Prochaska et al., 1988), or may be concluded from their powerful association to definite stages of change (Prochaska, 1997). Lifestyle theory grasps determinedly to the faith that it is the client not the counselor who is in charge of the assisted change process. The counselor's role is to assist the client in harnessing the client's natural proclivity for self-organization. Assisted change interactions are usually only a weak approximation of what can be achieved naturally. As such, the counselor should work to facilitate the natural change process that exists in all living organisms and serves as the foundation for self-organization. The counselor can also assist the client by removing obstacles that may be blocking the client's natural self-organization processes. The notion that an clients with a particular identified problem will respond in a like manner to the same intervention or that all people confronted with a similar problem require the same approach, while ludicrous, is accepted in some treatment circles. Each session must be tailored to the unique situation and interactive patterns of the person seeking help. This should be the case even if one's primary means of assisted change process takes place in a group. During a group session many issues are raised and addressed. Ten individuals attending the same session can hear the same statement yet get something totally different from the message. The guiding rule of the lifestyle process of change is to follow the client's lead. It is more than rhetoric to state that the client knows better than the counselor what he or she needs and is willing to work for at any particular point in the helping relationship. These issues must be addressed if the counselor is to fulfill his or her role as facilitator of a client's natural ability to self-organize. As the reader may recall from earlier discussions, the only true expert in terms of understanding a client is the client him- or herself. The initiation-transition-maintenance-change progression exists not only for the overall change process but also for each individual interaction within the helping relationship. This is consistent with a fractal interpretation of self-organization. It is therefore recommended that counselors take the initiation-transition-maintenance change process into account every time they interact with a client. A young man in a sexual lifestyle with strong voyeuristic tendencies commences a session by asking how his values may have contributed to his sexual preoccupation. The counselor might briefly educate the client about the four value clusters and describe the advisability of balance in the operation of this system. The client might then respond by forming an initial commitment to explore and perhaps alter his value system. This is then followed by a discussion of possible avenues of transition in the form of outcome expectancy modifications and skill development. The client can maintain the change by developing non-lifestyle relationships, committing himself to thinking and acting differently, and forging a new identity. Finally, the client is encouraged to view these changes as transient and in need of continued alteration as new information and situations arise. The four core elements of unassisted change are responsibility, meaning, community, and confidence. These elements provide an indispensable link to the assisted change process just as surely as they define unassisted change. In two of the sub-phases (metaphor, changing involvements) two elements are listed. While it should be noted that all four elements play a role in the realization of all phases and sub-phases of assisted change, some elements are more closely linked to one sub-phase than another. (O'Hare, 1996b) The information contained in Table 1 also illustrates how the different components of the lifestyle change model interact and influence one another. This is reflected in the overlap that exists between the first three chapters of this section on the lifestyle model of change. Table 1 Distribution of the Four Core Elements in the First Three Phases of Process of Change Phase Sub-phase, Goals, and Procedures Core Element(s) INITIATION Responding to Stress: Change and Crisis Responsibility Change Plan: A Public Pronouncement Responsibility The Shaman Effect: Achieving Perspective Sensitivity Community Ritual Community Metaphor Meaning/Community Dialectics Meaning Attribution Triad Belief in the Necessity of Change Responsibility Belief in the Possibility of Change Meaning Belief in Ability to Effect Change Confidence TRANSITION Changing Outcome Expectancies Meaning Skill Development Condition-Centered Skills Confidence Choice-Centered Skills Confidence Cognition-Centered Skills Confidence MAINTENANCE Changing Involvements Community/Responsibility Changing Commitments Community Changing Identifications Meaning Stages of Change Two reported investigations were considered for the exploration of presented steps of change from an experimentally obtained profile perception. These researchers used collective questioning techniques and found the stages of change to be more miscellaneous than initially recommended by factor investigative studies. Conversely, researchers look as if they were confident in two aspects concerning the stages of change. Primarily, understanding the known stages goes with understanding the two common methods used to review a person's present stage. A distinct categorical ordering engages discussing questions and decisive factors set at the judgment of the practitioner. Next method comprises of numerical trial and is referred to as an incessant statistical technique (Prochaska et al., 1992). Five factors of change that have appeared from the research acquired support through factor study and are described as under. (DiClemente et al. & McConnaughy et al., 1989; McConnaughy et al., 1983). Precontemplation is exemplified by the objective for change. Individuals located in this stage may characteristically be unintentional. They may be as opposed to the counseling practice as they were previously giving in to the pressure from relations, associates, or managers to get support. Contemplation tends to be distinguished by an understanding of the problem so far a lack of an influential action or an assurance to take essential measures for change. For all phases, particularly contemplation, it is imperative to differentiate between changes and basics for the potential changes. Preparation or decision-making resulted from the experiential work. Preparation, which has been hold up by cluster examination, is characterized by a judgment to change as verified by taking minute behavioral and cerebral actions required for change. Action is usually typified by explicit actions, yet it is possibly more correctly identified when the inspiration to get such steps is evidenced over moment, attempt and assurance. An upholding of compulsory actions that must be assembled for the wanted change to be continued epitomizes maintenance. If apposite and pertinent maintenance corrections do not carry on, a process of deterioration is expected to be reversed. (Cook, 2000) The second portion of the stages of change representation, in which researchers have articulated self-belief, holds the move between stages of change. Movement is much like that of a straight up curved relationship in which succession throughout the stages of change, for definite problem activities, is somewhat frontward and chronological. Central thing is that, development to a consecutive stage is mainly reliant upon the completion of particular responsibilities, signified by the stages. Integrating the change's stages when adapting interferences may initially incorporate classification of the end-user's stage. This can be most proficiently achieved by implementing the Questionnaire technique. Subsequently, it is indispensable to make out the desires of the client and classify the tasks to be done. Incorporating requirements and tasks estimation into practice is similar to mechanism of successful problem development and resolution categorized by Watzlawick, Weakland, and Fisch (1974). Currently the stress is on the implementation of a four-stage process: actual detection of the problem, categorization of results earlier achieved, real classification of changes to be attained, and identification and accomplishment of a plan to convene the preferred objectives. Levels of Change The basis of levels of change in Transtheoretical Model is worth noting. A firm application of Transtheoretical Model put together processes and stages of change within the framework of the problems, characterized by the five levels of change (Symptom/Situational Problems, Maladaptive Cognitions, Current Interpersonal Conflicts, Family System Conflicts, and Intrapersonal Conflicts). The amalgamation of the levels of change with processes and stages surely makes a Transtheoretical Model outlook more intricate but also more ample. Amalgamating Processes and Stages of Change To amalgamate the processes and stages of change into counseling practice, it is not utterly necessary to hold a strong loyalty to a single theoretical approach; however, it is essential to affirm to a general designed goal or direction of therapy. Within the framework of the amalgamation of many theoretical approaches, such explanations of counseling are complementary and somewhat assumed by Transtheoretical Model. Likewise, counseling from a Transtheoretical Model viewpoint allows for a more macroscopic approach (relating a widespread and complete theoretical framework) and personal adaptation (relating an increase in serious, logical, precise, and scientific-like thinking) rather than simple personal adjustment (West, 2005). A basic responsibility of the counselor is to assist the client in defining techniques required to achieve desired goals. The objective is to endorse the client's approach toward the problem to the subsequent stage of change resulting in new defy. A vital assumption of Transtheoretical Model is intentional change. Transtheoretical Model offers an explanation for former stages of change preconsideration and consideration. According to the application of Transtheoretical Model, advantageous changes with instinctive clients are much more likely when clients are optimistic to use stage appropriate processes. Presenting some substitute for resistant clients makes Transtheoretical Model different from many other approaches that insufficiently address the troubles of such clients, who are frequently deemed unsuitable for counseling services. Transtheoretical Model intrusions, customized with respect to stage of change, are designed with the considerate that particular processes are not only related with particular stages but that they encourage an individual to accomplish tasks at particular stages. Thus, a basic part of the Transtheoretical Model practitioner is to encourage change through the methodical application of successive processes that the client must use. The amalgamation processes and stages of change in practice may help the process of counseling. The exploitation of interpretation, in this regard, becomes a curative intervention. The importance of such interpretations cannot be vulgar. Questionnaire understanding, or assessment of items with clients, may be enormously helpful in interpreting how clients identify their problems, themselves, and their relation to the world (Goldman, 1971). Test interpretation methods have been used to help provide an apparent understanding of the identity and interests. Enhancement of the curative coalition, in which the counselor and client both gain an obvious understanding of particular tasks to accomplish for movement, may be a conclusion. Counseling from a Transtheoretical Model method may be seen as a technique designed to support clients in their efforts to accomplish the next stage of change. (Cook, 2000) From Pre-consideration to Consideration The amalgamation of processes and stages has great implications for client eagerness for change. Persons at the preconsideration stage are not prepared for confronts generally encountered with behavioral approaches. Persons at preconsideration are likely to be deficient in perceiving requirement or purpose for change. A person at preconsideration would get advantage much more from processes that enhance arousal and from loyal, nondirective interventions. From Consideration to Groundwork Customers at the consideration stage are likely to have a consciousness of their difficulty yet require the commitment essential for change. Clients at this phase may get an advantage most from investigation of values, personal objectives and preferred changes, identification of compulsory attempts for preferred changes, recognition of reasons for preferred changes, examination of used or unused approaches for making amendments (Groth-Marnat, 1997) and targeted inspirational conferencing. From Groundwork to Endeavor Customers at the groundwork stage have taken little behavioral and cerebral endeavors that are essential for change. These endeavors point out their potential obligation and may be improved through looking at reasons for and against altering and a record of strengths and weaknesses that may support to uphold or hinder particular approaches (Groth-Marnat, 1997). From Endeavor to Maintenance Since customers in the former stage have verified their exertion and dedication to change through explicit behaviors, they may gain most from behavioral approaches as well as discovering the intricacy of problems, levels of change, reevaluation of self-statements, examination of concrete essential attempts, and recording of opinions and acts (West, 2005). Subsequent to the endeavor stage, customers in the later stage, that is, the maintenance stage has established their enthusiasm and eagerness to actively continue the attempts obligatory for constant change. They may gain most from education of the deterioration dynamic and encouragement for sustained attempts essential to thwart deterioration of symptoms (Gorski & Miller, 1982). Limitations Transtheoretical Model is a framework to use with deliberate change. Though the recommended preconsideration and consideration related processes, plus motivational consultation, may prompt inspiration for change, consecutive phases are unlikely to be attained if change does not become deliberate. Certainly, several customers do not go through counseling experiences with objective to change but rather wish an annihilation of objectionable symptoms or circumstances. Transtheoretical Model may grant logical enlightenment for how interventions that ignore one's progress or stage of change may demonstrate hopeless or risky. Yet, the mechanism of Transtheoretical Model must be used with watchfulness. An analysis revealed the processes that were most extensive for a group of smokers marked at the preconsideration stage. To merely suppose progression from identified stages or to assume stages from identified progression is not adequate nor is it suggested. Group counseling presents many latent processes that may be unsuitable for a person's stage of change. But, research that incorporates the mechanism of Transtheoretical Model and group work is definitely deficient. Assessment of Transtheoretical Model has been narrowed down to compulsion populations. Transtheoretical Model may have propositions for a broad range of helping jobs that donate to the concept that change must take place for individual growth. There is a requirement to examine stage model parts amongst a wider population of crisis behaviors in general (Weinstein, Rothman, & Sutton, 1998). Further information regarding individuals in particular stages may be consequent in two manners. Foremost, stages may be incorporated with other features and theoretical concepts (for example, potential toward counseling) that may interrelate with, be related with, or influence stages. The other way is that information that has already been gained and realized about the distinctions between stages and between processes may be examined from a more complicated psychometric perspective (O'Hare, 1996a, 1996b). Conclusion Though many questions and concerns for research have leftovers, the processes outlined and stages of change seem to have both genuine theoretical and clinical prospective. Examination of Transtheoretical Model parts indeed unlocks a distinctive means to perceiving client change. Simultaneously, amalgamation of the processes and stages imparts empirically directed treatment planning allusion. Hence the Transtheoretical model has enjoyed much popularity in the alcohol and other drug field, though evidence supporting it is limited and there has been criticism and suggestions that it should be replaced. Assistance for the fundamental finding that processes are related with particular stages, with and without therapy, continues to build up. The handling of problem and troubles with the amalgamation of Transtheoretical Model of change may give a more planned and experimentally guided idea. Instead of utilizing only data-supported materials or firm theoretical methods, Transtheoretical Model covers and looks for to balance both empiricism and theory. Basically, the processes and stages of change, and the association between them, have come out from theoretical philosophy and pragmatic studies. At this spot in the progression of counseling practice, Transtheoretical Model has became apparent as an integrative representation that includes the benefits of nominal eclecticism without ignoring theoretical incorporation and science. References Cook, P. F. (2000). Effects of conselors' etiology attributions on college students' procrastination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, Pp 352-361. Gaw, K. F., & Beutler, L. E. (1993). Integrating treatment recommendations. In L. E. Beutler & M. R. Berren (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality, Pp. 280-319. Goldman, L. (1971). Using tests in counseling (2nd ed.). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear. Gorski, T. T., & Miller, M. (1982). Counseling for relapse prevention. Independence, MO: Independence Press. Groth-Marnat, G. (1997). Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. Highlen, P. S., & Hill, C. E. (1984). Factors effecting client change in individual counseling: Current status and theoretical speculations. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology, Pp. 334-396. McConnaughy, E. A., DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 26, Pp 494-503. McConnaughy, E. A., Prochaska, J., & Velicer, W. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, Pp 368-375. O'Hare, T. (1996a). Court-ordered versus voluntary clients: Problem differences and readiness for change. Social Work, 41, Pp 417-422. O'Hare, T. (1996b). Readiness for change: Variation by intensity and domain of client distress. Social Work Research, 20, Pp 13-17. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1992). The transtheoretical approach. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration, Pp. 300-334. Bergin, A. E. (1994). Introduction and historical overview. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., Pp. 3-18). Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. E, DiClemente, C. C., & Fava, J. (1988). Measuring processes of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 520-528. Prochaska, J.O. & Velicer W.F. (1997). The Transtheoretical Model of Health behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38-48. Tucker, J. A. (1995). Predictors of help seeking and the temporal relationship of help to recovery among treated and untreated recovered problem drinkers. Addiction, 90, 805-809. Watson, A. L., & Sher, K. J. (1998). Resolution of alcohol problems without treatment: Methodological issues and future directions of natural recovery research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, Pp 1-18. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. Weinstein, N. D., Rothman, A. J., & Sutton, S. R. (1998). Stage theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychology, 17, Pp 290-299. West, R. (2005). Time for a change: Putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of change) model to rest. Addiction, 100 (8), 1036-1039 Read More