Summary to essay on topic "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy"
In the era posterior to Marxist and the liberals, the debate has moved on to the new territory concerns the appropriate institutional framework, within the parameters of which a market may operate. Essences and markets Aristotle uses both the general essence/accident distinction and the more particular teleological account of essences to describe the market as a social institution (Marx & Fowkes, 347-574)…
Download file "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy" to see previous pages...
He proceeds thus in virtue of his taxonomic approach to the characterisation of an essence which he inherits from his biology: a sentence characterising an essence of an entity of a particular kind standard has the form of a noun phrase indicating a genus modified by an adjectival phrase that expresses the differentiae, Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now the properties that are peculiar to that kind. (Fukuyama, 82-113)
The chrematistic art of acquisition, because it involves acquisition of objects not for their "proper and peculiar" properties, is, for Aristotle, "unnatural" for humans, and hence to be held in check. It needs to be held in check, however, because it is the normal developmental outcome of exchange. The essential nature of market exchange is revealed for Aristotle in its developed "unnatural" form (Frank, 213-268). In this final state the dispositional properties of markets are exhibited. The most significant of these for Aristotle is the particular moral character it tends to produce: Aristotle's political theory is by and large concerned with the tendency of different social and political institutions to issue in different virtues and vices. The market, where its development is unchecked, tends to issue not in the virtues constitutive of a flourishing human life, but in the vice of pleonexia, the disposition to want more than is proper. (Marx & Fowkes, 347-574)
Distinctions and influences Aristotle's essentialism is a complex of claims that are logically independent of one another. One might accept his basic distinction between the essential and accidental properties of an object without accepting the further teleological specification of essences in terms of normal patterns of development. Indeed it is worth noting that the example of essentialist descriptions of copper I used in section A does not conform to the Aristotelian teleological model. Likewise one might accept essentialism in its basic form without accepting his particular taxonomic approach to the specification of essences. Again, it is possible to adopt an essentialist position in either its basic form or its teleological elaboration for entities in the natural world, but to reject it for the social world. (Fukuyama, 82-113)
One might accept essentialism about social institutions generally and markets in particular, but reject the teleological elaboration of essentialism that Aristotle offers. The options open to the "essentialist" are much more varied and complex than recent anti-essentialist caricatures of the position allow (Frank, 213-268). The picture of Aristotle's influence on subsequent essentialist thought about social institutions in general and the market in particular is similarly complex. Both Aristotle's essentialism and his discussion of the market have had a large influence on philosophical and economic thought. Aristotelian essentialism, as far as description of the natural world is concerned, has had a long-standing influence and indeed has recently undergone something of a revival. (Fukuyama, 82-113)
In the social realm it is possible to find theorists, most notably Hegel and Marx, who self-consciously defend Aristotle's essentialism in its full teleological form. Aristotle's discussion of th
...Download file "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy"
(“Contemporary Theories of Political Economy Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1502381-contemporary-theories-of-political-economy
(Contemporary Theories of Political Economy Essay - 1)
“Contemporary Theories of Political Economy Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1502381-contemporary-theories-of-political-economy.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC "Contemporary Theories of Political Economy"
Most entrepreneurial characteristics have come from the American country where by far, the rate of industrialization has not declined even though the rate of profits might have, from time to time. However, it must be noted that the US has had a major impact on world economies with respect to their industrialization as well and this answer aims at identifying how these various economic transformations taking place in the US and elsewhere were ratified and interpreted by various scholars and thinkers, with respect to a political state.
Every society is made up of groups of individuals that have certain hopes and aspirations; every state is made of people that want to find a way to find solutions for their growing needs and desires to achieve things and make a living for themselves as well as to support their families.
Hegemony is a critical issue when trying to explain political economy. This is because hegemony represents a post-war issue. Most economists understand it as an issue explainable in terms of international relationship. Hegemony to economists can be simply defined as a form of dominance.
Ignoring this major drawback would be a nave opinion because as per marketing orientation of ethics, people are irrational. Following will be arguments that support the fallacy of democracy and free market economy co-independence.
Free market economy suggests that the power of demand and supply govern the prices and purchasing power of people.
The importance of cultural industry is not merely limited to its economic capabilities (which is, of course, relatively strong); but also to the prominent role it has on the making and unmaking of peoples' identities, attitudes, values and lifestyles. The dynamics and complexities of the relationships between culture, creative industries and the political and economic development of societies have gained the attention of theorists and researchers from the mid-twentieth century itself.
These theories help understand political economy a great deal.
Introduction. It is generally believed that every meteoric rise of fame has its decline. History has in it explicit examples. Nations who made astounding
First the paper tries to explain why the freedom that Friedman has in mind may be a hindrance to the entailment of democracy. Secondly the paper deals with the explanation of why the common distinction between authoritarian rule and democratic rule is inconsequential for M Friedman’s general characterization of government.
According to Fukuyama, the end of Cold War was the end of history as the human civilization was unanimously converging on a single organization, i.e. the Western liberal democracy. The core of the argument that Fukuyama presented
The society accepts these ideologies, as they are facts about a certain group of people. They help provide pictures of the world in the aspect of what it is and what it ought to be, this helps organize the complexity of the world into something simple and
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Contemporary Theories of Political Economy"
with a personal 20% discount.