The Relationship between Our Daily Life and Military Technology Development - Annotated Bibliography Example

The paper "Military Technology Development in Our Daily Life " is a perfect example of an annotated bibliography on the military.  Altmann, Jurgen. "Critical Analysis of New Weapons Technologies." Peace Review 21.2 (2009): 144-154. SocINDEX with Full Text. Web. 9 Apr. 2015. Altmann’s article analyzes the development of new weapon technologies in the contemporary military and how it influences the economy. He claims that the intensity of research and development in the military has increased substantially due to the rise in the use of new technology in war.

In his analysis, he claims that the new technology makes human beings insecure and thwarts the initiatives of attaining peace. He outlines evidence from the nations involved in arms races such as Russia and the U.S, who spend heavily on military research at the expense of national development. Altmann’s argument is vital as the government spends heavily in arms while neglecting the initiatives that can improve the livelihoods of the citizens. The article is reliable as it contains non-biased information.

It focuses on relating the impacts of investing heavily in military research and development, and this makes the author give reliable information that does not rely on mere opinions. The audience of the article is the government. Altmann aims to provide reliable information derived from responsible agreements and decisions. The article is also reliable due to the incorporation of Altmann’s article in a reputable journal of Social Justice. The date of its publications reinforces its credibility and reliability for use in the project.

The material is suitable for use in this project as it will aid in the provision of information on the escalation of research and development in the U.S. It gives the project a firm basis for argument. It also gives an essence of justifying the impacts of the intensive military activity on the lives of the citizens. In combination with the other sources, the article will provide the requisite information for discussing the potential effects of military development in human life today. Jentsch, Florian, and Michael Barnes.

 Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. 2nd ed. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2015. Print. Jentsch and Barnes's collective work brings to the platform of scholars a detailed publication on how the future human-robot interaction will transpire. It claims that there will be significant negative effects on military personnel and civilians during the process of developing robot technology. They make their claim due to the underdeveloped technology for interactions between the ground robots, and the Arial controls vehicles.

Additionally, the authors draw their evidence from scientific research laboratories and practical military exercises. Academic scholars endorse this publication due to its reflection on the flaws existing in the process of development of new military technology that may have a significant effect presently and in the future. Information from this source is reliable due to many reasons explained below. It is not subject to any bias as it independently presents claims to reveal challenges in military technology development and in providing potential solutions.

The audiences of the book are civilians, the military, and the government. Being that its audiences are sensitive stakeholders in the society, the article has to be highly reliable, and this supports the need for its inclusion in the sources used in the project. Ashgate Publishing LTD, the publisher of the book, regards it as reputable. All the same, its availability in google books and its recent date of publication makes its information more credible for use in the project. The book is valid for use in the project as it provides sufficient information based on authentic research work.

It has shaped some aspects of the project as it introduces fresh knowledge of human interaction with military machines. When used together with the other sources it will reinforce the idea that military machines influence civilian’s lives, and it will also offer practical solutions to the menace. Laurienti, Jerry M. The U.S. Military, and Human Rights Promotion. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Security International, 2010. Print. Laurienti’s book claims that the U.S military has channeled sufficient effort towards promoting human rights across Latin America.

The author writes the book in favor of the initiatives of the American soldiers because the civil rights activists often ignore their contribution to promoting human rights. The means of reporting news about military actions evidence such claims. Therefore, the book is appropriate as it provides vital information that bridges a particular information gap in society. It is evident that the information in this source is reliable based on the efficient methodology and limits of bias. The source of information is credible based on the research methodology that draws diverse opinions from scholars and technocrats across the nation.

Its goal is to depict the military as a body committed to upholding human rights in Latin America. It may be subject to bias based on its sources of information. However, the author limits bias through the presentation of information from all perspectives and draws a clear conclusion on the role of the military in improving the livelihood of citizens. Its medium of delivery and the reputable nature of its publisher emphasizes on its credibility. The source is appropriate for use in this project as it positively influences the framework of the presentation.

It introduces a positive perspective of viewing the relationship between military activities and human life. Instead of focusing on the negative impacts, the source also touches on the positive attributes of military development on human life. In conjunction with the other sources, the book will strengthen diverse viewpoints on military activities.