Critical Analysis of the Iraq War - Essay Example

THE IRAQ WAR CRITICAL REVIEW Introduction Critically, the bitter relations between U.S.A and Iraq have quite a long history. Since Iraq is wealthy economically because of the oil deposits, the perception is that the negative influence might have stimulated the trouble and animosity, which erupted to a war. Seemingly, Iraq viewed U.S.A as a political enemy, economic foe, and a threat to its establishment of a stable society. The U.S.A deemed that the nuclear operations being conducted by Iraq government and its scientists were hazardous to the existence of a peaceful environment globally as they were targeted for mass destruction. After the end of the Cold War, the global political structure changed advertently since each nation disguised itself to be friendly while still undertaking its objectives. For instance, North Korea, Libya, and Iraq are the nations whose intentions in the development of weapons of massive destructions did not cease with the decline of the Cold War1. Through the involvement of the Intelligence Community, the non-traditional threats presented by such nations are identified before the nations’ intended period of execution. The following discussion is a critical approach to evaluate that evaluates the Iraq war and the consequences suffered therein. The background of the war The Intelligence Community executes its objectives through a planned process that serves to investigate the activities conducted by suspicious political regimes in different nations. Since the US is a superpower economy, it could not let any nation to try and seize the political and economic structure through the use of destructive tactics that would eventually expose the entire globe to suffer from the loss of lives. For example, the U.S.A held that Iraq’s militarization and nuclear practices threatened its superiority. Further, America’s invasion to Iraq emanated from the perception that Iraq’s armament projects targeted to influence the war against terrorism that the U.S nation had been leading2. However, it is critical to acknowledge that the U.S had been harsh on Iraq because of practicing scientific projects whose result would lead to the production of mass destruction weapons. In the recent past, U.S.A and its allies invaded various economies in Asia in an attempt to counter terrorism masterminds, topple the dictatorial leaders, control arms production programs, and secure their economic aims in the oil and natural gas’ rich economies. According to the conducted research, the war started with Afghanistan’s Al-Qaeda and Taliban groups and eventually advanced to involve the Iraq nation. Thereafter, the group identifies the intensity of the threats through the Continual Philosophy. Notably, the intelligence’s resolution to establish the continuous process of the non-traditional threats enables it to gain added information concerning the masterminds to the activities, and the targeted organizations from political, social, and economic points of view. To the US, Iraq posed as a political enemy to the entire world3. With the manufacture of nuclear weapon in progress, it felt the pain and could not sit back and watch not to imagine the repercussions of the relaxed approach to the condition and the ultimate consequences of possible destruction. Iraq had lived in abrupt hostility with the government of Israel, most of the European nations and the U.S.A. This made it hard for the western countries to relax and assume that all was well while their common enemy was preparing to attack4. Discussion of the Iraq War According to the reviews, weapon manufacturing in Iraq became a threat to the society and uncertainty in future prospective. For instance, the UN organization is capable of militarizing troops from allied nations and intervening in those nations whose leadership practices and humanitarian activities raise ethical issues; hence, the presented information from the research is accurate that over 3,500 military personnel have lost their lives in the war. To be precise, non-state actors are capable of amassing support from many nations compared to nation-state actors5. Further, non-state actors are capable of influencing the socio-cultural and economic structures of nation-state actors in order to ensure that the political structures profess and seek to implement democracy for the benefit of the majority population. Lastly, the collapse of the Cold War influenced non-state actors to impose stringent measures over nation-state actors in order to ease political tension among nations and ensure a lengthened period of security. The nation of Iraq was i deviating from the social welfare empowerment practices in an attempt to restructure its nuclear weapons. Poverty and poor standards of living threatened its citizens, and such would result to an ultimate poor economy. Iraq, with its oil rich mines threatened the entire flora and fauna as its ability to engage in nuclear manufacturing could be lead to daunting consequences under minute provocation. The perception became a worry and a vital issue to address; hence, it steered the invasion of the great nations. The contemporary approaches in defining the non-traditional threats present in the society may show similarities to the Intelligence Community’s adoption of the Continual approach since the society is capable of investigating questionable practices. The implementation of democracy across many nations is a vital tool through which individuals seize in order to research and report the ill motives that seem to be conducted by their prospective political structures. The introduction of technology-based devices has served the Intelligence Community with the use of creative methods in the identification, evaluation, and reporting of the non-traditional threats. For instance, the improvement of satellites has influenced aerial navigation. Through the technologically based approach, the Intelligence Community has been capable of amassing critical information and remitting it to powerful structures, which are capable of executing accurate solutions to destroy the threats. Discussion of the why and who of the war The conflicts between the Israeli and Palestine nations spurred the perception that Iraq would join as an ally to Palestine. Critically, in the recent past, U.S.A had not shown any interests to strike as compared to Israel, but it remained worried over the outcome of an Israeli strike on Iraq. Since U.S.A is an ally to Israel, Iraq would assume any strike as a joint effort and would retaliate against both nations6. The U.S.A on the other hand, understood that the uranium rich nuclear sites were likely to produce weapons to aid terrorism; hence, it was provoked to push for the disarmament and destruction of the uranium plants with the intention of promoting peace and rights for the countries’ citizens. Arguably, the pressure of the U.S.A government on the Asian and Middle East governments could be articulated to the antisocial and dictatorial practices that hindered the equated growth. Crude oil being the most sophisticated mineral and with its products ranging from gasoline and engine oil to the chemicals used in making drugs, the developed nations including the U.S.A with its big population and consumer market viewed this as a threat and fought back7. On the other hand, the society is limited to the application of technological creativity in the identification of non-traditional threats as national and international organizations argue out that the intelligence units have the exclusive mandate to conduct such activities. The international and national intelligence units assume the disposal of such critical information to the society is a breach to every set of security protocol. However, the society can address non-traditional threats using collaborative practices. Mainly, the Arab Spring nations are the world’s leading oil producers, and their day-to-day increments in crude prices were affecting the consumers, not to mention their citizens, a factor that spurred the prevalence of the Arab Spring uprisings8. The Intelligence Community engages in collaborative practices during investigation. The process propels the intelligence aids to reach for individuals in the society and inquire for information that will direct them to the source of threat or rather enable them to learn about its existence. On the other hand, the society is mandated by the democratic structure of the constitution to inquire about their security from the Intelligence Community. The links between the war in Iraq and the Arab Spring uprisings The influence of America on Iraq’s nuclear enrichment plants followed the utterances of Iraq’s leaders who had declared the possibility of engagement in an intense plan to construct more nuclear plants. The enemy countries could not come into terms with Iraq’s decision and the antisocial practices that involved the execution of innocent civilians; hence, they undermined the projects with the use of military tactics. The existence of powerful non-state actors serves for the best of the majority since the objectives executed during the set intervention processes restrain the existence of impunity while still enforcing democratic and ethical solutions to problems. United Nations is a critical organization that serves as a non-state actor in implementing democratic structures to enhance economic and social development in different nations at the global environment. From a critical point, the fears were that if such a tendency was not contained as fast as possible, the outcome of it would lead to global political and economic crisis. However, it had resolved to make time to time calls for the United Nations experts’ investigations and others from the opponent countries to start their expeditions aimed at scrutinizing it equipment and reporting on any kind sophisticated weapon manufacturing. Critically, the U.S.A and its allies took the opportunity, and sent experts to carry out the assignment, and amass information to report on the exact findings that would prove Iraq guilty9. Research indicates that non-state actors differ from nation-state actors as they implement strategies to ease the existence of poor governance and over-centralization of power in nations, practices that represent the interests of a small proportion of the population contained in certain political structure. They had thus gone ahead to seek alternative ways to contain the problem mainly via technology. Iraq’s former leader, Sadam Hussein stood strong to mention the incredible success to counter all forms of attacks from its political enemies. In the past, the western governments had been alerting their troops on the eruption of a more complicated war. Iraq on the contrary had tried to convince the western nations that it had the intentions to produce the weapons in large scale from its plants. The report findings had declared Iraq in accordance to the claims. The opponents believed that Iraq manipulated the whole exercise before calling for inspection. Despite nation-state actors acting to safeguard regional views for the benefit of their subjects, it is known that powerful individuals may control the critical structures of the systems in order to acquire sole-based interests instead of representing the majority population in the nation10. Critically, the involvement of political and social non-state actors is the only remedy to restructure nations and geographically defined communities from dictatorial regimes. Arguably, non-state actors are powerful than nation-state actors. Despite the high levels of secrets maintained by intelligence units, the society should learn of the existing non-traditional threats at a given time. In the fourth account, the Intelligence Community engages in counter-intuitive practices to identify and report the existing and newly-developed non-traditional threats in the global society. The interrogative process is crucial in identifying the non-traditional threats’ network. On the contrary, the society is incapable of amassing such information since the act amounts to spying, and it is capable of stirring political conflicts. Lastly, the society may show similarities to the Intelligence Community if it chooses the consumer-friendly approach since it will be capable of identifying non-traditional threats without raising suspicion. Conclusion The argument is that the distress that most of the countries of Arab Spring are associated with terror groups was a key drive for the U.S.A to handle Iraq’s situation with an iron fist. The evidence accrued depicts that at a given time, Al-Qaeda’s leader Osama Bin Laden must have secured refuge among the countries of Iraq, Palestine, Pakistan, and Iran. Therefore, the act of Iraq’s involvement in offering a hideout to the global terror enemy had provoked U.S.A since Bin Laden was responsible for terror attacks on U.S.A embassies and The Pentagon. In conclusion, the argument is that the above stated issues were repressive to the required global social practices in any nation; hence, the U.S perceived the need to engage Iraq to a war. Bibliography B.B.C News. “Powell Warns Syria and Iran,” In BBC News, One-Minute News. March 31, 2013. Bumiller, Elisabeth. “Obama Warns Libya but Attacks Go On,” In The New York Times Africa. March 18, 2011. Burke, Jason. “Qatars decision to send planes to Libya is part of a high-stakes game,” In The Guardian, 24 March 2011. DeYoung, Karen and Sly, Liz. “Syrian rebels get influx of arms with gulf neighbors money, U.S. coordination,” In The Washington Post, May 15, 2012. Fisk, Robert. “Americas secret plan to arm Libyas rebels, Obama asks Saudis to airlift weapons into Benghazi,” In The Independent, World Edition. December 08, 2014. Fox News. “U.A.E. Draws Praise From U.S. for Participation in Libya,” In FoxNews.com, March 24, 2011. George, Marcus. “Interim nuclear agreement between Iran and six powers,” In Reuters U.S Edition, November 24, 2013. Jenkins, Brian M., Andrew Liepman, and Henry H. Willis. Identifying Enemies Among Us: Evolving Terrorist Threats and the Continuing Challenges of Domestic Intelligence Collection and Information Sharing. Rand National Defense Research Inst Santa Monica Ca, 2014. Ristik, Jelena. "The Future of the Nation-State in the Era of Globalization." In Proceedings from the International scientific conference, no. 1, pp. 577-586. 2012. Secretary Council. “Security Council Requires Scheduled Destruction of Syria’s Chemical Weapons, Unanimously Adopting Resolution.” In Meetings and Coverage Press Releases of the United Nations. Vol. 2118 (2013). Read More