Public Administration - Case Study Example

Public Administration Case Study Question The faces a hard time in maintaining its garbage using the current method. The current garbage collection method faces many challenges. The collectors do not do their duty perfectly. Most of the time, the workers are out of duty leaving a lot of garbage lying around uncollected. It was due to this that the media held investigations and found that the workers were not doing their work but hang around in bars the whole day.Question #2Some of the questions arisen include whether the city is willing to lay out some workers in order to archive effectiveness in the garbage collection.

The experiment showed that limiting members of each crew would be more efficient and less costly. The replacement would involve the use of more advanced equipment that would require less of human labor.Question #3The most important information that helped a great deal during the whole procedure was the use of number of residents representing the city. It helped to identify all aspects of the city and the character of garbage deposition throughout the city. It gave a clear picture that is important in predicting and planning for the city.

Another important aspect is the use of time and population as the basic data unit.Question #4During the experiment, certain assumptions made lead to its success. The garbage cans used are of average capacity from each home. Therefore, the amount of garbage is of the same capacity from each home. Another assumption is the residents willingly cooperating with the staff and following every instruction as required.Question #5Methods of analysis used to evaluate the methods were the same in all scenarios.

The study used tables to represent and analyze the data collected. The study considered the total average weight collected in five days, time taken to access seven hundred and thirty units in the street, time taken to access five hundred and sixty five units in the alley, labor costs and price of equipment. The next step is conversion of the data to the total city population to give the overall picture. Table representing the data used in analysis.Total average weight (5 days)730 street-access units time565 alley-access units timeTotal city street-access timeTotal city alley-access timeTotal cost an crews per yearNumber of crews needed to serve the whole cityAnnual labor cost to serve low-density areaMethod 145500lb1.28770.6903184076.744834.9$110859.84117.39$13013837Method 2437501.36990.7611195827.249433.4$84360.64125.77$10610038Method 3467001.02740.6372146866.841384.1$84360.6496.54$8144176Method 4489000.64380.469092031.230463.3$84360.6462.82$5299535Method 5432000.71920.7257102809.647131.9$57861.4476.89$4448966Question #6In the method one and two, were not effective as it was prone to a lot of time wasted.

The methods could not allow for maximum garbage collection. Although method three and four were quite efficient, the cost of maintenance of the modified rear-loading packer would cost the town a lot. Method 5 proved to be very efficient and economical. The side-loaded vehicle eased the work and it improved every individual’s responsibility in garbage collection. The cost of modification and purchase the trucks in method 4 in a spurn of 20 years is $595000, plus an additional maintenance fee of $168000 giving a total of $763000.

Yet the same for method five gives $728000. The method proves to be efficient in the end as compared to any other method.Question #7The study recommends the use of method five in the city garbage collection. It allows minimum number of workers to do the total work without having time to lazy about. It also allows for maximum garbage collection. In addition, the method is pocket friendly and does not give room for misappropriation of city funds.