StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets" sheds some light on brand equity that is difficult to build, so a brand has an interest in maintaining it. It is tricky to not undermine brand equity when discounting items, but it can be done…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets"

Introduction From the beginning of mass production of goods, brands have gone out of their way to differentiate themselves from one another. The problem was that brands were not necessarily appreciably different, so it was important to build brand equity. Brand equity is basically where a certain brand manages to differentiate itself from the pack of competitors and build a loyal following. In that way, the brand had a name which connoted to the loyal customer that he or she was purchasing an item which was worth a premium because of the equity that the brand had built. Brand equity may be undercut by discounting, however. This is when rival brands institute a way of undercutting the other brands by discounting their own products. It is a prevalent way to do business, as it is a way for the brands to get new customers who hopefully will be loyal to them in the future. However, this may backfire, as it may actually undermine brand equity if not done correctly. Thus, if a brand has a discount price going on in a store which is not upscale, then the customer may perceive that the brand already raised the prices before putting it on sale, which means that the the customer will feel deceived. Moreover, if a brand puts its products on sale too many times, this also destroys brand equity, because the customer will perceive a lower set point for the price of the item. Therefore, the brand must be careful when discounting its merchandise, for brand equity is a commodity that must be protected. Brand Equity Modern consumption is also driven by the choices that were being offered in modern society, choices that were not offered in earlier societies, before mass production of goods became the norm (Gabriel & Yang, 1995). This mass production had a side effect as well, one that would influence the post-modern individual’s obsession with labels and designers – branding became essential, as there were so many goods flooding the market, that companies needed to distinguish their goods from the multitude of other goods that were coming into existence. According to Naomi Klein (2000), this led to competitive branding and, ultimately, to the rise of designer labels, such as Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren (Klein, 2000). Because brands are essentially the same – Coke is not really that much different from Pepsi, Reebok is not much different than Nike, Apples are not appreciably different from PCs – companies must find a way to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Goldman & Papson (1996) argue that this has led to a rather cluttered landscape for the world of advertising, as each brand tries to get a leg up on their competitors by branding themselves as somehow different from the rest. Because brands have a hard time saying that their product is better than the other guys, they instead seek to raise their symbolic image value – LL Beans flannel shirts may be the same in quality as Wal-Marts, but the image of wearing an LL Beans shirt makes the value more than Wal-Mart. A Kate Spade purse may be made with exactly the same materials as a purse from Target, but since the name “Kate Spade” is attached to the purse, the value is suddenly ten times higher. It is all about the image that has been carefully cultivated in the advertisements for these brands, where the product and the image coming together is known as a “commodity sign”. This is what is meant when somebody says that one is “paying for the name” (Goldman & Pappas, 1996). An excellent example of building a brand image and value that differentiated a company from a competitor was the advertisements featuring the “Mac Guy” and the “PC Guy” - the Mac guy was portrayed as a young, hip guy while the PC guy was an overweight, balding, dweeb. Hence the image is that Mac is fresh, hip and young, while a PC is outdated, slow and uncool. Identity became a construct of consumption, in that people, both men and women, started using consumption not as a way to express ones identity, but to construct it - “brands are how we figure out who we are.”(Kacen, 2000). This reflects the fluidity of an individuals identity, and reflects that gender identity is also a fluid concept, as opposed to a fixed attribute (Kacen, 2000). Part of this was made possible by the Nikes and Tommy Hilfigers of the world who are not just selling products, but the image that their brand connotes. Therefore, mere manufacturing has been replaced by marketing (Klein, 2000). Price Discounting – Why It Occurs This brand value – Gucci, Coach, Louis Vitton, Ralph Lauren, Nike, Hermes, Apple, etc. - is an intangible worth billions, and has to be carefully maintained and cultivated for it to survive. Moreover, a price war can disrupt the brand differentiation if the differences in two products are minor (Goldman & Pappas, 1996). An example of this would be if Burger King suddenly dropped their prices substantially for their products, thereby cutting into McDonald’s market share. This would disrupt McDonald’s careful brand differentiation, as, in the end, consumers care more about price than the name when it comes to fast food. It probably would not work as well in the case of, say, a Gucci bag verses a Target bag – the Target bag can drop the price all it wants, but the person who wants the Gucci will still get the Gucci, because it is the label that they are after, price be damned. Therefore, because of the similarity of brands and the desire for marketers to get a leg up on the competition, price-discounting occurs. However, this can create problems in determining market share, because price promotions and reduced prices can make for a deceptive brand equity measure, if it the brand equity measure increases in response to the price discounting (Aaker, 1996). Moreover, there is some indication that customers who shop on-line are more sensitive to price discounts (Degeratu et al., 2000). Does Price Discounting Work Well In Attaining Its Objectives? Price discounting, as indicated above, is used to differentiate one’s brand from other brands because of the problem of brand similarity. There is some indication that price discounting may actually hurt a store’s image and the brand image, and that it might not build sales (Grewal et al., 1998). Therefore, whether or not it actually works depends on other factors. One factor is known as the perceived discount. According to Gupta & Cooper (1992), retailers will commonly inflate the price of the item before “discounting” it, which distorts the perception of the savings that are offered. This may lead to problems with price discounting, as the public becomes aware that they are being deceived, which would ultimately backfire on the retailer. Gupta & Cooper states that a customer will perceive deception in this regard more if the retailer is less reputable than another retailer. So, a high-end store will be more successful in discounting items, as individuals will be less suspicious that they are being deceived, then would a low-end store (Gupta & Cooper, 1992, p. 402). So, a discount at Saks Fifth Avenue would carry more weight then a discount offered at JC Penney. Price discounting is also more effective when used on a name brand then a store brand. Gupta & Cooper (1992) states that if a brand name has a high amount of equity, this brand is generally not harmed by discounting. In other words, a consumer will not think that a Kate Spade purse is of inferior quality just because it happens to be on sale. On the other hand, a discounted store brand is more likely to be perceived to be less credible then the discounted name brand. Therefore, consumers are more likely to be suspicious of a discounted store brand, and believe that they are not getting a good deal, then when they are dealing with a discounted name brand (Gupta & Cooper, 1992, p. 403). There are other factors which affect how a consumer perceives the value of the discount. According to Blattberg et al. (1995), there are a number of empirical generalizations which can be applied to the act of price discounting. Among these is that, if a certain brand discounts its products frequently, then this backfires, as it lowers the consumer’s reference price for the brand. Correspondingly, if the brand discounts frequently, then the height of the deal spike is lowered (Blattberg et al., 1995). How Can a Product Manager Effectively Incorporate Discounting Without Harming Brand Equity or Value? According to the research, brands have to look at credibility as a major issue when discounting their brands. If a customer suspects that the original price was inflated, then the customer will put less credibility on the discount. This is more pronounced with lesser known brands and brands with lesser equity then with better known brands with higher brand equity. Moreover, it is clear from the research that a brand cannot do multiple discounts, because that destroys brand equity. It destroys brand equity by lowering the value of brand, as the customer gets used to the brand being discounted, so the discount value of the brand essentially becomes the price point that the customer expects. With this in mind, the example of effective price discounting will focus upon a well-known brand, Nike Shoes. Because the brand is well-known, and has an established brand equity, there is less of a chance that the customers will perceive deception on the part of Nike if they decide to discount their products. Nike also has to make sure that it does not discount its brand multiple times. Since the case scenario will focus on just one brand of shoe, the Air Jordan. In this case, the Air Jordan will be discounted, just one time, by $20. The promotion will not run in stores which do not have good brand equity for finer products, such as Target, if they carry the brand, or a discount shoe source. The only stores that will have this promotion will be the Nike stores in the malls and stores which are perceived to be upscale, such as Nordstroms, Nieman Marcus and Bloomingdales. This will lend credibility to the discount, as the customers will be less likely to believe that there was a price markup on the items before the sale. The promotion will run for one month, only. The customers will receive special promotional coupons through their e-mail, but only if they have already purchased Nike products previously and have indicated that they are open to receiving special offers. This will give the customer the perception that the shoes are not discounted for just anybody, but, rather, to select customers. This should also help in retaining the brand equity, in that the perception will be that these customers are privileged to get this discount. Therefore, Nike will not necessarily be seen as desperate to move these shoes, but, rather, will be seen as giving a gift to loyal customers. The objective in this kind of price discounting is for the customer to buy the shoes, and like them so much that they become a loyal customer. They will remember that Nike gave them a nice gift in the form of the discount, so this will help build the brand equity as well. In this way, the discount will actually further build brand equity, as opposed to tearing it down. Conclusion Brand equity is difficult to build, so a brand has an interest in maintaining it. It is tricky to not undermine brand equity when discounting items, but it can be done. In the process, the hope is that the customer will remain loyal, thus enhancing the brand equity in the customer’s eyes. References Aaker, D. (1996) Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management, 38.3: 102-120. Blattberg, R., Briesch, R. & Fox, R. (1995) How promotions work. Marketing Science, 14.3: G122-G132. Jacqueline J. Kacen (2000), ‘Girrrl power and boyyy nature: the past, present and paradisal future of consumer gender identity,’ Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18/ 6-7, 345-355 Degeratu, A., Rangaswamy, A. & Wu, J. (2000) Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets. International Journal of Research Marketing, 17: 55-78. Gabriel,Y. and Lang,T. (1995) The unmanageable consumer, Sage: London Goldman, Robert & Stephen Papson (1996). Sign Wars: The Cluttered Landscape of Advertising. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Grewel, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., Borin, N. (1998) The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. Available at: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=mkt_fac&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26sqi%3D2%26ved%3D0CDAQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdigitalcommons.calpoly.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1010%2526context%253Dmkt_fac%26rct%3Dj%26q%3Dthe%2520effect%2520of%2520store%2520name%2520brand%2520name%2520and%2520price%2520discounts%26ei%3D0r-STuPxDMW5tgfZp9ihDA%26usg%3DAFQjCNHzseY4mjeMhl1BVXExeC3CkzW5qA#search=%22effect%20store%20name%20brand%20name%20price%20discounts%22 Gupta, S. & Cooper, L. (1992) The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds. Journal of Consumer Research, 19: 401-411. Klein, Naomi. No Logo: No Space, No Choice, No Jobs. New York, NY: Picador USA, 2000. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets Case Study, n.d.)
Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/marketing/1580936-brand-management-managing-price-discounting-and-its-possible-impact-on-brand-equity
(Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets Case Study)
Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets Case Study. https://studentshare.org/marketing/1580936-brand-management-managing-price-discounting-and-its-possible-impact-on-brand-equity.
“Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets Case Study”. https://studentshare.org/marketing/1580936-brand-management-managing-price-discounting-and-its-possible-impact-on-brand-equity.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets

Building Customer Connection with Old Spice

Strivers believe that money is a significant justifier for better social status, often seeking to purchase products that are considered premium in an effort to emulate those in society with more financial resources.... The brand attempts to illustrate that it can alter the lifestyle dynamics of the consumer, transforming their environment from one of mundane and commonplace living to one of excitement and thrill.... The brand does an excellent job of blending lifestyle marketing, relationship marketing, and elements of logic to appeal successfully to its target market....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Marketing is more of an art than a science

This phenomenon then validates such scientific approaches to marketing such as the Product Life Cycle model in certain markets as social compliance provides consistency that allows for quantitative research methodology when behaviour is no longer a variable.... Consumers often maintain egotistical relationships with a brand, that is, until the consumer has found a psychologically-based connection to a brand.... Consumers often maintain egotistical relationships with a brand, that is, until the consumer has found a psychologically-based connection to a brand....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Sainsbury Style - Service Innovation at the Multinational Grocery Retailer

In order to successfully launch this new service concept at the organisation, trends in consumer purchasing of personal beauty products and services were necessary to predict revenue growth and demand in the desired male target market group.... hellip; This service model will be positioning under premiumisation strategies justified by years of brand loyalty achieved by the business through consistent and socially responsible marketing efforts.... In order to compete successfully, Sainsbury must begin providing supplementary services unrelated to grocery procurement with a private label brand focus....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

An Analysis of Brand Equity of Blacks Leisure Group Plc

Herein rests its strength from the point of view of brand equity. In determining a brand's equity, it is important to refer to the pioneers of this marketing concept that has since grown to become an interesting field of research, constantly being pushed and developed by both academics and industry practitioners alike.... This gave rise to the brand equity's subsequent definition as the "added value with which a brand endows the product.... In 1991 David Aaker put forth the model of brand equity in his seminal work "Managing brand equity" (1991)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Brand management in Irelands indigenous sector

What is a stronger brand name: HP, Visa, BMW, General Electric, Marlboro, McDonald, Ford, Coca Cola or IBM Why is a brand strong or weak How do brand strength levels change over time How do brand strengths vary by country and markets and why Such questions are fascinating and also practical. … But what is a Brand A brand can be defined as "a name, term, sign, symbol or design, or combination of them which is intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of competitors (Kotler 1991, p....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Service Marketing Enhancements for JetBlue

Social media is not effective in all markets, thus the business should invest additional capital in promotion to fully advertise its value proposition and gain more market attention.... JetBlue, a leading low-cost airline company, recently experienced a significant drop in trust related to the brand due to significant volumes of service failures.... Customer sentiment about the brand was greatly reduced because of these customer service breakdowns, leading to a… To improve brand sentiment, service delivery, and ultimately profit, an assessment of the 7 Ps of service marketing is conducted. JetBlue maintains few problems with the traditional 4 Ps of marketing....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Amazon Marketing Strategy

The company now has such a wide variety of competitors in many different industries, both in saturated markets and those with only a handful of major sellers.... Therefore, the company should be focusing on building a brand personality for the company as a whole, making a variety of markets gain favorable impressions of the company and not the products or industries in which the business operates.... The marketing strategy is to ensure that disparate consumer segments build a perception of brand preference for Amazon....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Understanding the Retail Industrys Ecology

In some markets, as iterated by the Wheel of Retailing Model, a new market entrant may establish a low pricing structure.... This essay "Understanding the Retail Industry's Ecology" focuses on the fact that evolution is absolutely critical to sustaining positive ecology between consumers and firms which were founded on vintage brand ideologies and consumer relationship development.... The totality of the relationship between consumer and retailer is underpinned by established trust in the brand or retail organization, having superior service quality, and providing perceptions of value as determined by important target consumers (Deng, Lua, Wei and Zhang 2010)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us