StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Role of Communication with Resistance to Change - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This assignment "The Role of Communication with Resistance to Change" is about organizations that operate in a constantly changing environment driven by globalization, technological changes, and cultural shifts. Change communications management calls for a timely and appropriate generation…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Role of Communication with Resistance to Change"

Change Management College: Name: Students ID: Date: Course Name: Unit Code: Time: Instructor: Question 1: Discuss the role of communication in coping with resistance to change. Today, organisations operate in a constantly changing environment driven by globalisation, technological changes, and cultural shifts, among other factors. Consequently, the organisations have got to change accordingly in reaction to the environmental changes. This process of change ought to be managed well seeing as it is growing to be a crucial aspect within organisations. However, current research reveals that 60 – 70 per cent of change programmes do not succeed. Resistance to change has been time and again come out as the key factor causative to these failures. Resistance to change can arise as a result of various reasons. Among these reasons is poor communication. Poor communication has been found to be a main setback when analysing abortive change processes. As in any other business discipline, the significance of communication cannot be overemphasized in managing change. Change involves, individuals, teams, stakeholders, along with other groups. Each participant has their own communication needs. Change communications management calls for timely and appropriate generation, collection, dissemination, storage, and ultimate disposition of information. Organisations depend on effective communication to kick off and sustain change. In the end the sensation of whichever change endeavour relies on how well the approach for and the essence of the change is communicated to those who are the targets of change. Research shows that effective communication is very much beneficial to organizations seeking to implement change. Communication with employees keeps them up to date regarding the change progress. Change usually comes with lots of uncertainty. People will resist change seeing as this uncertainty threatens their position. They will more often than not have cynical feelings regarding the outcomes of the change process or the security of their job among other factors. Communication helps to shrink the level of uncertainty by presenting correct information. Moreover, with effective communication, it is possible for the organisation to deal with resistance arising from insufficient or wrong information breakdown from the recipients of change. It helps to prove to people of the desire to change. Communication also entails an exchange of ideas, opinion, fears and doubts. This exchange gives emphasis on a participative approach, where employees in an organisation are involved there by smoothing the process of implementing change. Through communication, the organisation may well attend to concerns held by employees. It also enables the organisation to pay attention to strategic issues, especially in the first stages of the change process. Effective communication can be enabled through various methods, such as, face-to-face dialogue, group presentations, conferences, and reports, among others. The organisation should plan its communication carefully, specifying the method and frequency of communication, which vary depending on the needs. Communication too helps to handle stakeholder expectations. Setting the correct expectations with each and every one stakeholder will smooth the progress of controlling change and ensuring that all stakeholders find essential information. Cultural considerations in communication are also important due to the globalisation of the work environment. The organisation ought to consider various cultural nuances such as nodding, shaking hands, and use of gestures, among others. Question 2: Discuss why it is useful to see appreciative inquiry as having an important role in building readiness for change. Appreciative inquiry is a strand of action research. Action research is a research method that was intended to be more practical and give emphasis to the use of participation in research. Appreciative inquiry was developed to boost the traditional action research method. In the area of change management, appreciative inquiry has gained much attention within the past two decades. Appreciative inquiry is important in managing change seeing as it is intended to arouse social innovation. This predisposes to a constructive and beneficial view towards individuals, organisations as well as circumstances. Appreciative inquiry circumvents one-dimensional problem-solving boxes by arousing the need to generate and find out fresh potential for creating improved existence. Appreciative inquiry fastens the progress of change and builds readiness for change in a number of ways. First, it requires the change process to be positively stated and be a sign of vital issues arising from the need for. Besides, the mainstay premise of appreciative inquiry should unite with the style of change management used, the organisation’s overall vision along with the future goals so as to impose the permanence of the organisational changes considered necessary. Third, the relevance of appreciative inquiry depends on the target people’s way of life. It cannot be applied in a downbeat ambience, since in such a situation there is grand alarm of spreading information. Also, appreciative inquiry comes in handy where knowledge and opinions of various parties exist. Stakeholders are also required to have an open mind-set. Finally, the individual applying appreciative inquiry must harmonise words (what one tells about appreciative inquiry) and actions (what one does). This will boost the rate of success. Apart from the above factors, appreciative inquiry is further supported by five principles drawn from five different constructs and values. These form the outlook that appreciative inquiry takes in effecting change. The five principles are: (1) The Constructionist Principle; (2) The Simultaneity Principle; (3) The Poetic Principle; (4) The Positive Principle; and (5) The Anticipatory Principle. Appreciative inquiry is further cemented by a 4-D cycle framework. The 4-D cycle framework corresponds to four distinctive phases through which change is guided. The 4-D”s comprise: (1) Discovery; (2) Dream; (3) Design; and (4) Destiny in that order. Discovery is an introspective phase that draws people close to the experiences along with high points correlated to the organisation. In this phase information used in the dream phase in sourced. The Dream phase is intended to infiltrate existing patterns and craft likeness of the potential that existing in the organisation. The Design phase develops the Dream phase by probing what is required to realise the vision created in the Dream phase. Characteristically, the Destiny phase makes up the approach used to realise the future state. Brainstorming is crucial in this phase as it enables the establishment of adequate leverage right through the whole organisation. Figure 1: The 4-D Cycle Question 3: Discuss whether there is a single ‘best style’ of managing change, or whether the style of a change agent should vary according to change situations. There are many styles of approach to change management; nonetheless, every style has its goods and evils. No one style is supreme in every one situation. In reality, the most important thing is to choose the style that fits to the situation. Different styles of management are determined depending on the context. For example, education entails elucidating the rationale and means for change. This is more suitable when there is a lack of information or people have been misinformed and can be used to change their mind. In this case, change will possibly be more successful if those targeted by it are drawn in its development and planning. Participation helps to put up ownership in the change process. Participants will be able to cultivate a more upbeat mind-set to change and perceive the restraint encountered and will as a result be more geared up for change. However, excessive involvement can run the risk of finding a way out from the bottom hence there ought to be somebody to intercede. A change agent passes on the elements of the change process to task forces or project teams, who then may be required to collect data, generate ideas, among other assigned duties. But this gives rise to commitment issues as these groups may well execute parts of the change process. Use of direction from the top comes with a plain vision on how the change will transpire and can come with priorities. Coercion is a very much acute form by issuing pronouncements that direct change from the top; for instance, in an emergency. It is clear that each style in appropriate in different contexts. The best approach would be to use different styles for dissimilar stages. This is because styles of managing change can fluctuate in line with the stages in the change process. For instance, direction from the top may be required to trigger off speediness for change and participation can help out in acquiring a wider commitment. Styles of managing change can as well vary with time and scope. For instance, participation could be preferred for incremental or deep-seated changes in an organisation whereas transformational change could do with a directive approach. In reference to power distribution, hierarchical power arrangement could do with direction from the top whereas flattery/ adhocracy power arrangement could do with a participative style. On the other hand, based on personality traits, people endowed with the utmost potential to manage change may well know how to take on dissimilar styles in dissimilar situations. In a nutshell, styles of managing change are not mutually exclusive. Armed with a clear path on the general vision may give support to a more collaborative approach or a more comprehensive strategy development. Whereas education and communication could be more suitable for some stakeholders such as financial institutions, participation possibly will be essential in areas where it is obligatory to put up speediness and capacity. References Jabri, M. (2012). Managing Organisational Change: Process, Social Construction and Dialogue. Palgrave, Macmillan. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Role of Communication in Coping with Resistance to Change, the Best St Assignment, n.d.)
Role of Communication in Coping with Resistance to Change, the Best St Assignment. https://studentshare.org/management/2069416-answer-three-qusetion
(Role of Communication in Coping With Resistance to Change, the Best St Assignment)
Role of Communication in Coping With Resistance to Change, the Best St Assignment. https://studentshare.org/management/2069416-answer-three-qusetion.
“Role of Communication in Coping With Resistance to Change, the Best St Assignment”. https://studentshare.org/management/2069416-answer-three-qusetion.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Role of Communication with Resistance to Change

Organisational Change Consultancy

Running head: ORGANIZATIONAL change CONSULTANCY Insert Name Insert Grade Course Insert 5th.... change Management Plan According to Queensland government, (N.... , p1), change management plan contributes the required flexibility, since it is designed to satisfy the needs of the organization.... The change management ...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Resistance to Change Paper

resistance to change is a common topic, which is being addressed in organizations globally.... There are organizational and individual factors that can cause resistance to change in an organization.... This essay shall highlight and analyze some of the factors and how the Lewins theory of change can be used to overcome resistance to change.... Firstly, organizational causes of change resistance are the factors within the firm, which causes resistance to change....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Large Corporations Managing Change

In this regard, the role of internal change drivers and catalysts is vital.... The present study 'Large Corporations Managing Change' intends to investigate the reasons that compel firms to change, and how companies manage the change process.... However, when we refer to organizational change, we are specifically referring to change that has a significant impact how employees think about their organization and the changes they need to make in their work to cope with it....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Management Communication- Change Management Report

Kurt Lewin was the first to introduce unfreeze, change and freeze framework for the change management and since then there has been a lot of work on this topic (Australian Business Solutions, 2012).... change management refers to alteration in the management of an organization.... The first step covers the preparation, assessment and strategy development; the next step includes detailed planning and change ement implementation; and the final step involves any corrective action, which needs to be taken to remove gaps in the process (Lattuch and Young, 2011)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Implementing Change Paper

Here comes the role of managers.... Managers manage the situation with their different managerial skills and convince their subordinates about the change in the department.... Any change need proper communication.... Managers communicate different reasons of change in the department.... Any change is uncertain and there is a fear of unknown related with that.... change is the only constant thing....
4 Pages (1000 words) Admission/Application Essay

The Rule of Change in Project Management: Drivers and Resistance in Saudi Arabia

The problem is resistance to change.... rained leaders do not take resistance to change as a problem.... Additionally, the study gave four reasons why giving people insights would be beneficial in avoiding resistance to change (Joseph, 2014).... he main problem of the research, will be to evaluate the drivers and resistance to change in organisations in Saudi Arabia.... This will be an analysis of the role of drivers, both internal and external, in bringing favorable changes to the organisations....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Proposal

Rationale for Change

The author focuses on organizational change which is generally used for an extensive change within the organization where companies try to change, implement or also re-engineer their processes.... In most cases, organizational change tends to be radical and can lead to a reorientation of the business .... change is the only constant.... Businesses face numerous changes and a new mantra that businesses now follow is 'change or Perish'....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Communication is a Crucial Aspect of Effective Organization Change

The physical safety of employees and how they conducted their work was what management wanted to change immediately – from proper protective equipment to job briefs, to how the jobs were completed.... The study "Communication is a Crucial Aspect of Effective Organization change' seeks to prove that strong leadership is found in how the leader is engaged in communicating with employees and in allowing traumatic processes, letting the status quo to be gradually made part of the firm....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us