Principles in the Event Management - Essay Example

ActiveBeing project 15 ActiveBeing project 15 In order to be successful in management practices, one requires a lot of principles that may guide him or her to be successful in the event of management (Kreamer, 2012). The impasse of what comprises the theoretical base of project management subject has been looked at from different angles. Drawing specifically from the literature, an impulsive discourse of the trend and the story is elucidated so far. The consensus that has been settled on reveals that the research focus on development of theory lacks much behind other contributing factors in the hierarchy such as those that have been labeled as insights, new technologies, model building and testing. Mediation regarding theory development in project management is not a recent development; this essay has discussed the fit between several published theories regarding project management and individual practice as a result of my participation in the Being-Active project. There are several published theories about management, though this article has touch on a few that were relevant with the discourse. Actually, the discipline of project management is not the only discipline of knowledge that within its progression falls into this trap of reinforcing its theoretical base as one of the academic discipline. Theory can be described as a scientific principle facilitating prediction and avails explanation for a given phenomenon as contrary to the body of knowledge (Tauber, 2007). In respect to this, a theory as the way it has been defined in natural sciences entails empirical verifications founded on direct observations and personal experience as per laws or scientific typology that assists in organizing things, give an explanation for the past and predicting the future occurrences and help explain the factor behind the way things do happen. Most entrepreneurs are most likely to have employees with skills in project management. This may be so in that learning the skill of project management becomes more useful and important. Good project managers are come from experience or being trained, and not by birth. (Blanco, 2011) In getting involved in ActiveBeing project 2014-15, there are several managerial theories that one may notice as to being in use. There are some critics who argue that there is no explicit theory of project management (nmbm). During the stay, there were a lot of activities which needed to be handled in order to achieve the goals at the end of it all. As new entrants into the field of management that is competitively hard to handle, it was advisable to look for some guidelines that would lead to achieving goals at the end of it. Under theory of management, there are several sub-theories that have been discussed: Theory of planning Fondahl (1980) clarifies that it is specifically impossible, or at least it is much difficult maintaining an up to date plan. Fondahl describes the outcome illuminatingly; “One of the major failures in networking techniques application has always been the failure to put into use the dynamic potential of the existing procedures. Almost too often, nevertheless, only the original plan or layout and scheduling data are always produced. They will always cover the office wall long after they are totally obsolete and possess minute resemblance to the current job progress.” Thus, empirical evidence gives support to theoretical argument of the impracticality of maintaining a complete up to date plan. Having a manageable plan was a mandatory task in order to realize what we wanted at the end of the day. Theory of execution It turns to be illuminating to compare and contrast a given engineering prescription for dispatching and a given anthropological justification of the situation when this prescription has been deployed. Fondahl the following procedure for execution purposes based on the implementation of crucial path network; basically for dispatching: “Give weekly memos to lower level managers and subcontractors whose activities are in progress during the week. They should have updated start dates, specifics on methods and utilization of resources, as well as the current activity duration approximations.” Applebaum (1982), characterizes the resulting duality of management on the construction site; “virtually, two separate organization do exist; one for the management function and one for getting the work done. In most occasions, the two organizations never coordinate their work, and they are composed of different goals and viewpoints.” In a conventionally managed construction work, a realization rate of 50 to 60 per cent is typically achieved for weekly tasks (Miles, 2012). Broadly this low rate could be explained by the missing inputs or resources during the execution of that task. These specific scenarios are fully in line with the theoretical argument that in management as planning approach the execution stage, must depend on informal management for success to be realized. Any task pushed to execution lack chronically inputs (Wang, 2014). The execution managed informally appears to be a direct consequence from the underlying theory of management. Theory of control The type of control that has been advocated for by the management methodology holds in practice a minor and dissimilar role as compared to the prescription (Bauman, 1986). In past successful projects, meetings have turned to form the basis for the major part of the kind of decisions made. Financial performance records have been residing in supplementary functions like confirming the picture on how the activities are proceeding through various channels and providing data on performed task that can be used in future similar projects; this reflects the lack of the learning function in the thermostat structure; it is simpler, faster and much illuminating to directly consider deviations in task execution and to be enlightened on their causes that performance metrics. Discussion; After reconstructing underlying theoretical foundation of project management through comparing core elements of project management prescriptions to currently available theories in management, it is realized that project management is founded on a theory of project and on a theory of management comprise of three sub theories. The underlying theoretical foundation of project management is deficient, better or complementary theories may be found (Mcgrath, & Bates, 2013). Experience is equally important when it comes to management, though for one to gain the need experience, s/he needs tools that would help in achieving the experience. At times, management appears to be like a completion where individuals aspire to be one of the best out of the many organizations that are existing and operating in the same division; having this in mind, it would be unfair and waste of time for a person to compete without sufficient techniques that would see success come at the end of it all. An inexperienced manager needs a well co-ordinated plan to work with. It is no exaggeration to assert that project management as a discipline is under crisis, and the fact that a paradigm change, long overdue, should be realized. The aim of this article is not presenting new management theories. However, the paper has tried to look into the importance of having these theories whenever management task arises. The present evidence is strong enough to argue that a paradigmatic transformation of the project management discipline is required. The transformation needed implies that a more cherished relation between theory and practice should be established n project management. Practice and theory should be developed concurrently, as well as other science based fields, where theory is explicated, tried, and refined in a continuous dialogue between the scientific and practitioner communities (Maier, 2007). As a result of the above discussion, there is several project management theories applied in the fit, and compared to my personal experience, most of these theories are ft. Nevertheless, this is a virtual work only focusing on the design part, and some of the outcome may not be accurate. Even though this may be true, through the entire work period, I have managed to enhance the concept of project management and acquire the technique and the needed experience of project management. Biography Applebaum, H.A. 1982. Construction Management: Traditional versus Bureaucratic Methods. Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 55, n:o 4: 224-234. Fondahl, John. 1980. Network Techniques for Project Planning, Scheduling, and Control. In: Handbook of Construction Management and Organization. Frein, Joseph P. (ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Pp. 442 – 471. MILES, J. A. (2012). Management and Organization Theory a Jossey-Bass Reader. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons. MCGRATH, J., & BATES, B. (2013). The little book of big management theories ... and how to use them. Harlow, England [etc.], Pearson. TAUBER, R. T. (2007). Classroom management sound theory and effective practice. Westport, Conn, Praeger Publishers. COLE, G. A. (2004). Management theory and practice. London, Thomson Learning. WANG, C., & HE, J. (2014). Brand management in emerging markets: theories and practice. VAIDYA, K. (2012). Inter-organizational information systems and business management: theories for researchers. Hershey, PA, Business Science Reference. WANKEL, C., & DEFILLIPPI, B. (2008). University and corporate innovations in lifelong learning. Charlotte, N.C., IAP - Information Age Pub. KREAMER, A. (2012). Its always personal: navigating emotion in the new workplace. New York, Random House Trade Paperbacks. BAUMAN, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], Cambridge University Press. ÁLVAREZ DEL BLANCO, R. (2011). Personal brands manage your life with talent and turn it into a unique experience. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. MAIER, R. (2007). Knowledge management systems information and communication technologies for knowledge management. Berlin, Springer Berlin. Read More