Developing andTransitioning Economies do Exhibit Entrepreneurial Behaviour - Essay Example

al Affiliation Developing and transitioning economies do exhibit entrepreneurial behaviour Defining entrepreneurial behaviour The growth of an economy is comprised of the progressive embrace of the various factors that define the concept of wealth generation. The ability to have a continuous path of income generation and wealth creation remains the ambitions of such economies. Apparently, the concern of the considered wealth is perceived on the aspect upon which it improves the livelihoods of the entire population. Growth in income generation offers opportunity that trickle down to the satisfaction of the entire society along the description of both employment opportunities and mediated services. On such accords, the respective adoption of entrepreneurial behaviour may be associated to the increased desire of improving the economy via paths that are regarded fair for all. Entrepreneurial behaviour involves the development of novel solutions in the market with hope of capitalizing on the untapped consumer habits. Successful entrepreneurs are regarded to be able to deduce ideas that match the interests of their market in a rewarding and prolonged manner. The basis of an entrepreneurial behaviour remains on its ability to shape the considered consumerism towards the considered aspect of development and growth. Enticing growth of the economy is thus perceived to be an entity that comprises of differing elements of wealth generation. Arguably, entrepreneurship is listed among such trends and behaviours. The promotion of the various characteristics of entrepreneurship is perceived as an ideal path towards the address of the respective concerns of unemployment on any economy. Evaluating available literatures Various authors have embarked onto various missions of presenting the respective role of entrepreneurship in any economy. Their publications have considered the plight of both developing and transitioning economies as the ideal candidates upon which their respective concern of entrepreneurship may be adopted. Additional concerns including the prospective role of such ventures in the shaping of these economies remains central in the description of their work. The perception of entrepreneurship being regarded as a tool of expression in respect to the development of an economy is regarded as the commencement point of the enterprise growth (Quereshil et.al, 200). The enterprise is described as the sole tool that promises immediate returns and ease in governance in the various states and nations. Such implication allows its elevation into a status that promotes economy improvement along the considered desires of growth and revenue generation (Glancey & McQuaid, 2000). Apparently, the perspective of entrepreneurship being regarded as a key contributor of the prospective adjustment in the economy remains a common consensus among the respective authors. Entrepreneurship is regarded as the backbone that supports the growth of economies across the globe (Prodan, Drnovšek & Ulijn, 2006). Understanding the implication of the various entrepreneurial behaviours is regarded as the foremost initiative towards the stabilization of the national wealth generation capacity. Arguments in favour of the respective capacity in the promotion of the entrepreneurial behaviours, as the ideal avenues upon which economy growth may be envisioned, have suggested the involvement of the involved players in the art. Cementing the beliefs of entrepreneurship have been regarded as the ideal sources of employment in the various economies (Booth, 2014). Apparently, unemployment is regarded amongst the challenges of the contemporary society (Kennedy et.al, 2003). It remains apparent that the eventual conceptualization of such entrepreneurship interests being the pillars of economy growth has a number of inconveniences (Glancey & McQuaid, 2000). Ideal perception that challenge the interests of entrepreneurial behaviour is founded on the increased cost that is accosted to its implementation. The involved authorities are tasked with the implementation of these ambitions as a function of infrastructure and other interests of developments (Iakovleva, Kolvereid & Stephan, 2011). The promotion of the considered entrepreneurship behaviour is regarded as a critical expense to the various economies. Taping the interests gained from their implementation is further considered as unethical (Bradley et.al, 2012). The integration of modern entrepreneurs into the entire concept of economy growth is accosted additional challenges. Modern entrepreneurial behaviours involve the invoke of aspects such as the consecutive participation of technology and innovations into the realization of a business edge. Arguably, the role of such perceptions towards the improvement of the economic capacities of the involved population is furthered by the interests played by the respective entrepreneurship in the promotion of wealth generation. The prospect of having a functional entrepreneurial outfit is considered against the possible interest it stands to impact on the involved stakeholders (Pittaway, 2012). However, the promotion of such entrepreneurship interests is considered to be furthered by the government interests or pursuits of bettering the lives of their citizens. Arguably, the contribution of such interests to the government are amplified by the consideration of the input offered by the respective authorities (Qureshil, Kamal & Wolcott, 2009). If governments are involved actively in the promotion of the considered entrepreneurial behaviours, it is apparent that these habits have a contribution in the shaping of their considered economic growth. However, arguments against the promotion of these habits are furthered regarded as a concern by the respective governments. The elemental argument accorded to such claims is founded on the nature of these habits (Praszkier & Nowak, 2012). There exists no legal or functional description of the valid business interests when the concern of entrepreneurship is regarded. Entrepreneurship interests can include criminal behaviours that include the concern of money laundering and other non-legit interests (Smith, 2009). Such observations allow for the conceptualization of the interests that are annexed to the concern of entrepreneurship behaviour. Arguably, the concern of entrepreneurship interests being abused by the respective members of the society allow for the mounting of resistances towards the embrace of these practises in the respective economies. The perception of entrepreneurial behaviour resulting into the realization of habits remains best regarded as vices of the society remains an apparent concern. Such interests may eventuate into the suggestion of the prospective behaviours of consumerism being regarded as observations and undertakings that do not uphold the virtues of a growing economy (Štrukelj, Mulej & Sternad, 2012). However, such observations do not credit the prospective overhaul of the entire wealth generation path. However, the probable cause of these concerns may be configured along the prospective failure of having terms such as entrepreneurship considering the eventual implication of their impression. It remains apparent that the observation of the respective terms of entrepreneurship remains an act that desires extensive observation. The suggestion of an entrepreneurial mind being the backbone of the enterprise drive that steers the economy advancement in the respective nations remains valid if the honest interests of such endeavours are considered (Vinig, 2005). Entrepreneurial mind is perceived as the only option that allows for the advancing from the crisis of unemployment (Williams & Lansky, 2013). Citizens and interested foreign investors are anticipated to generate opportunities through the integration of solutions to the interests of the consumers in their market targets (Wood, 2010). It remains apparent that such entrepreneurial behaviours formulate a core perception of the economic growth of the various nations under the perception of both developing and transitioning status. Overview of both ends of the opinion An evaluation of the available literatures regarding the concern of entrepreneurial behaviours allowed for the presentation of the prospective arguments that associate to the concern. Such suggestions consider the implication of the respective input the entrepreneurial mind has over the prospect of a developing or transitioning economy. Arguments against the contributions of the entrepreneurial habits propose on the possibility of the implementation teams being unable to offer oversight on the entire process. There exists a number of suggestions that provide an insight on the possible abuses of such developments under the two models of economies. Concerns such money laundering and the implementation of concealing activities remains accredited to the challenges of the society harbouring the entrepreneurial behaviours. Additional concerns propose on the possibility of having the society face challenges in the implementation of viable entrepreneurial interests. The challenge of regulation of the prospective failures that may be associated to the engagement of the entrepreneurial interests remains the only concern against the respective embrace of the habits. However, there exists a number of attributes that may be related to the concern of harbouring an entrepreneurial mind with a population. The concern of unemployment has been presented as being critical in the realization of economic advancements desired by any state. Such challenges desire to be accorded additional interest in regards to the impact they engage on the economy advancement. Wealth generation remains key in addressing the needs of the society. Apparently, the concern of vices emerging from the society has been linked to the eventual failure of the population having meaningful sources of revenue. Entrepreneurial mind allows for the realization of such interests. Apparently, allowing for further actions against the prospective suggestions of incapacitated regulation over the suggested gains enticed by an entrepreneurial behaviour remains a challenge that can be addressed. National security allows for the realization of such regulations. Shelving the benefits of an entrepreneurial mind in the promotion of the prospective wealth generation in retrospect to the prospective concern of shelves should not be considered. The possible hindrances associated to the entire process of managing an entrepreneurial economy can benefit from other solutions that may be regarded to be off the limiting of the implementation of these interests. Apparently, the benefits that stand to be gained from the respective attributes of entrepreneurial interests are considered superior of the suggested detriments. Allowing the entrepreneurial habits of the population to thrives allows the improvement of the considered sense of creativity and the eventual growth of the sources of income generation. Additionally, concerns that capture the interests of both transitioning and developing economies are best dealt with allowing for prospects of income generation. Entrepreneurial interests remain the best aspects upon which the embrace of such interests of economy growth may be achieved. Such is considered with the perception of the swelling levels of unemployment as perceived by the respective economies across the globe. Such further implies that the eventual challenge of unemployment is not tailored for only the developing and the transitioning economies. Allowing the public to delve into promising paths of revenue generations permits the realization of the considered avenues of income growth. Additional perspective such as the consideration of viable ventures may be addressed through the initiation of avenues that allow for the consideration of growth and legality being primal in the eventual observations of the interests. Conclusion Entrepreneurial habits are critical in the shaping of the economic interests of the various nations. The states categorized under either transitioning or upcoming economies stand to reap the most benefits from these observations. It remains apparent that the prospective ability of having an entrepreneurial mind or habit offers significant benefits to the targeted economies. It allows an opportunity to address the critical concern of increased unemployment. The concern is regarded amongst the critical challenges of the developing or transitioning economies. Entrepreneurial behaviours allow the population an opportunity to delve into other avenues that are regarded as promising in respect to the process of income generation. The involved governments are only concerned with the promotion of the respective agenda through interests such as capital and infrastructural support. The challenges of the entrepreneurial behaviours being prone to possible abuse may be addressed by the initiation of measures that delve into the sustainability of a culture of accountability. Aspects such as national security perspectives may allow for the address of these concerns. Arguably, entrepreneurial habits remain the most viable path upon which the realization of transitioning or developing economy status may be achieved. Reference Booth, J. 2014. Emerging markets in an upside down world: Challenging perceptions in asset allocation and investment. Chichester, West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons Ltd Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. June 01, 2012. Capital Is Not Enough: Innovation in Developing Economies. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 4, 684-717. Glancey, K. S., & McQuaid, R. W. 2000. Entrepreneurial economics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. Iakovleva, T., Kolvereid, L., & Stephan, U. June 28, 2011. Entrepreneurial intentions in developing and developed countries. Education + Training, 53, 5, 353-370. Kennedy, J., Drennan, J., Renfrow, P., Watson, B. M., Ceantral Queensland University., & Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand. 2003. Situational factors and entrepreneurial intentions. (Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Small Enterprise Association of Australia, 1-12.) Ballarat, Vic: Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand. Kumawat, H. S. 2009. Modern entrepreneur and entrepreneurship: Theory, process and practice. Jaipur, Raj: Sunrise Publishers & Distributors. Pittaway, L. January 01, 2012. The evolution of entrepreneurship theory. Enterprise and Small Business : Principles, Practice and Policy, 9-26. Praszkier, R., & Nowak, A. 2012. Social entrepreneurship: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Prodan, I., Drnovšek, M., & Ulijn, J. M. January 01, 2006. A conceptual framework for studying a technology transfer from academia to new firms. Abstract, 30-31. Qureshil, S., Kamal, M., & Wolcott, P. January 01, 2009. Information Technology Interventions for Growth and Competitiveness in Micro-Enterprises. International Journal of E-Business Research, 5, 1, 117-140. Smith, R. August 14, 2009. Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour in organized criminals. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3, 3, 256-268. Štrukelj, T., Mulej, M., & Sternad, Z. S. January 01, 2012. Enterprise ethics as a necessary paradigm for enterprises development. Researching Economic Development and Entrepreneurship in Transitional Economies, 691-700. Vinig, G. T., Van, . V. R. C. W., Burgelman, R. A., & Chesbrough, H. W. 2005. The emergence of entrepreneurial economics. Bingley, U.K: Emerald. Williams, C. C., & Lansky, M. A. December 01, 2013. Informal employment in developed and developing economies: Perspectives and policy responses. International Labour Review, 152, 355-380. Wood, D. C. 2010. Economic action in theory and practice: Anthropological investigations. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Read More