Nobody downloaded yet

Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Martha Stewart Insider trading is when whoever has access to a companies’ confidential information about its stock takes advantage of the information by trading in the company’s stock. The accessibility of the alleged information ought to have an effect on the prices of the company’s security…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal"

Download file to see previous pages Most Americans considering its controversial nature overwhelmingly waited for the verdict on Martha Stewart’s case on 27th, December 2001.However, the question on whether Stewart committed the crime is open to question. Martha Stewart was found at fault for selling her ImClone shares. The US attorneys accused her of obstructing fairness and that she was deceitful to investigators. According to attorneys, Stewart was blameworthy of insider trading. I strongly do not accept as true that Stewart committed an insider trading crime given that she acted on her stockbroker’s knowledge. Sam Waksal, the ImClone CEO did not either clue-up Stewart or her stock brokers the defiance of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to appraise the untried cancer drug, Erbitux. Fascinatingly, Sam, on selling his shares, was just speculating on the decision that could be taken by FAD. He did not have the packed information and for that, could not reveal any to Stewart. Decisively, Martha did not commit insider-trading crime (Drew 707-708). Tight spot is whether the US Attorneys and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) used good decision in indicting Martha Stewart. Stewart, having been advised by Bacanovic who was her stockbroker to sell her shares if ImClon shares fall below $60 saved $ 45,673. Banacovic complained that his worksheet had been altered but was considered malice. Although, SEC filed a civil complaint against Stewart, the resolution arrived at in indicting her is doubtful. The issue was supposed to be inside trading but was twisted to conspiracy, obstruction and lying to the investigators. Martha overtly denied accusations against inside trading. Though she got a call that Sam was selling her shares and went ahead to sell her shares too before calling Sam, she was not a victim of inside trade. She just relied on her friend’s trustworthiness. Prosecutors must have had additional motive for pursuing the case. Instead of filling a suit of inside trade against Stewart, which was supposed to be a criminal case, the issue of inside trade was left and the suit was certainly turned to a civil case. The prosecutor must have had a motive of proving a point to the public that even celebrities cannot escape the rule of law. There was no enough evidence to rule the case. The government simply wanted to show that it was strict on business crime (Drew 708-710). I certainly do not concur with the jury that Martha was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. How even in a nonprofessional’s language, can failure to provide evidence by an individual’s guilt be termed as obstruction of justice? Surprisingly, no one stood on the courtroom as a casualty of Stewart’s action. The fact that Stewart kept mum was not enough to declare her guilty. Stewart postulates that she acted upon receiving information that Sam was selling his stock. The information that she got was from a competent individual whom she solely depended on for guidance when it comes to stock matters. Upon hearing the information, she decided to sell her stock. Like any other individual, she could have not waited any further but to save her money before loss. In addition, Sam although he was the CEO of ImClone, did not receive any information from the Food and Drug Administration that their drug was going to be rejected. He further did not leak any information to Stewart that could make her gain inside knowledge about the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from
(Case Study of Union Carbide and Bhopal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Case Study of Union Carbide and Bhopal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words.
“Case Study of Union Carbide and Bhopal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal

Bhopal Gas Tragedy

..., the death toll could be even bigger. Union carbide had 50.9% share in UCIL, the company which caused this huge tragedy. The Indian government had control over the remaining 49.1% of the shares. Supreme Court of India allowed Union carbide to sell out its shares to Eveready Industries India Limited in 1994 even though the compensation cases were pending in the Civil and criminal courts in Bhopal, India. In 2010, one of the district court of Bhopal convicted seven ex-employees of UCL along with its chairman Warren Anderson. The court declared 2 years imprisonment as punishment and $ 2000 as fine to these culprits....
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

The Bhopal Disaster

...? The Bhopal Disaster The tragedy at Bhopal occurred on the 3rd of December 1984, when a huge gray cloud of poisonous gases leaked out from Union Carbide’s pesticide plant which was located there. The tragedy was on an unprecedented scale, wherein more than 3780 persons were killed and more than 200,000 people suffered from latent injuries, which continued to manifest themselves over the years (Willey et al, 2006). The legal consequences of this disaster were such that the company paid out over $470 million as well as other considerations as damages. The technical reasons for the occurrence of the Bhopal disaster was the contamination of a storage tank of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Bhopal Disaster

..., Union Carbide agreed to pay over 300 million USD to the victims of the Bhopal disaster as a means to attempt to evade any further litigation surrounding the matter. However, due to the sheer size and scope of the Bhopal tragedy, such a sidestep was impossible (Kripalanin 2008). Eventually, the legal ramifications of the Bhopal disaster forced Union Carbide to divest itself entirely of its Indian holdings and sell of the remainder of its operations within the subcontinent. As such, many individuals, both within India and within the remainder of the world thought that a likely end to the legal wrangling surrounding the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Bhopal Union Carbide

... Sur Bhopal Union Carbide Case Study Introduction: With an incidental accident occurring in the year 1984, in Union Carbide Chemical Factory, in Bhopal in India, a lethal chemical gas was released in the air killing and injuring thousands of people who were living in the region. While several individuals were killed, thousands of others suffered from severe health illnesses even till death. The company was held responsible for the incident considering their lack of sincerity and effectiveness in maintenance of the equipments and units that caused the leakage on one hand and on the other hand could not prevent the spread of the chemical as well. Although the US Union Carbide Company had its holdings in the Indian Company; yet... it was the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

Case study Case Study

...Assignment (Answers in Bold) Part A The following questions were answered based on the case of: Peter Smythe v Vincent Thomas [2007] NSWSC844 (3 August 2007) Available at: Question 1: In what court was the case heard (1 mark) The case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court. Question 2: Name the judge and explain his title. (2 marks) The judge is named Rein, and Rein is an administrative judge as evidenced by the title AJ. Question 3: Name the plaintiff and defendant and their counsel. (4 marks) The plaintiff is Peter Smythe and the defendant is Vincent Thomas. The plaintiff's counsel is B. Kasep,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

European Union Law Degree Case Study

...European Union Law - Problem Question According to the Directive 2008/48, Member s should adopt measures to prevent the private use of carbon based fuels. The UK government, while adopting this Directive, by means of Statutory Instrument SI /1432/09 of 15th January 2009, had authorised private energy providers to supply commercial energy, using renewable and non - renewable energy sources. If the provisions of the Directive are ambiguous or less precise, conditional and its implementation requires the action of the state, then the principle of indirect effect makes them effective. Secondly, the provisions of a Directive can be enforced against private parties indirectly. In this case the defendant must not be a state entity... upon Member...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

European Union Law Case Study

...Where a Member fails to implement a Directive by the set in the Directive there is ity that an individual can commence an action in the national court or tribunal under the principle of direct effect. Mark and Sunita should first establish that their respective employers can be classified as being the State or an emanation of the State in order to rely on direct effect. In Mark's case we are told that he is employed by a council. In Foster and Others v British Gas plc [1990] the Court of Justice expanded the definition of the 'State' to include: "organizations or bodies which were subject to the authority or control of the State or had special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable to...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Bhopal Disaster

...Bhopal Disaster Introduction The unfortunate incident that took place on December 2, 1984 in the Bhopal of India is the ic example of unethical practices by a corporation that resulted in loss of thousands of precious lives. Causes of Disaster The incident was attributed to water leakage into methyl isocyanide (MIC) holding tank, due to slip blind water isolation plates that were excluded from another tank's lack of maintenance procedures' application. The reaction resulted into a major increase in the temperature of the liquid inside the tank causing the toxic gas to explode. Prior to the disaster, the company, Union Carbide was rated to have the best worker safety...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

European Union Law Master Case Study

...member states. Putting this principle in operation in the present case, it will mean that there is no difference between whether and not the employers of Ruth and David were guilty of gross negligence when the two sustained injuries that made them permanently disabled and out of work. In short, Directive 999/98 which is purported to be obliging employers to tender compensation to them for permanent disability must be implemented in favor of Ruth and David without need of any condition or qualification. To otherwise do so would be against the very spirit and import of European Union laws which protect the workers and safeguard their interests. The requirement sine qua non stated in the Agricultural...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal Case

...Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal Case The moral judgment of an individual or business in doing right or wrong forms a platform for ethical reasoning. The decisions an individual or company makes depend on individual or group determinants. In case of business, these decisions bring forward what the corporate culture entails. Any organization must determine what the right course of action will be about choosing various choices. For most businesses, profit maximization forms their key goals and objectives. It has seen many companies getting involved in unethical involvements with the aim of increasing revenues. They do not want to reject the route that...
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case study of Union carbide and Bhopal for FREE!

Contact Us