Global Leadership and Managment - Essay Example

The dissatisfaction amid the Cuban public generated a productive environment for Castro to get control as a leading actor. His concerned behavior toward the subjugated quickly made him a role model within his country. Castro created close associations with the Soviet Union, “nationalized the local industry” (Ramonet and Castro, 2009), detained or executed enemies, and formed an environment of eternal stress with the United States of America. There was an obvious and passionate link between Castro, his adherents, and the state of affairs when he took leadership.

The contemporary restlessness of the Cuban public toward the administration made it convenient for Castro to get control as a rescuer. Castro showed a transformational leadership approach, as he was capable to persuade his adherents’ standards, moral values, principles, as well as long-standing objectives on a profound affectionate level (Coltman, 2005). Transformational leaders express the difficulties within the existing arrangement and have a persuasive image of what a fresh society or group could be; Castro was capable of influencing his adherents to bring about more than what was generally anticipated from them.

Another former great leader was Martin Luther King, Jr. “He was raised in the contemporary, conventional way of segregation between Blacks and Whites” (King and Carson, 2001). King’s best accomplishment was his leadership during the ‘great protest rally’ within Washington, DC on August 28, 1963. His objective was to support the development of the “Beloved Community” (King and Carson, 2001), foreseeing a fresh social structure in which all sorts of individuals as well as groups would reside together in harmony and uniformly share the wealth of ‘God’s creation’.

He consequently utilized his brand new authorities to deal with prejudice. The rapport between King, his adherents, and the state of affairs, was apparent. There was ethnic separation. Blacks wanted a compelling, powerful, dominant leader to lead them and bond them for official development. King was mainly attacked “as their leader without initially even wanting it: he just happened to be at the right place at the right time” (Phillips, 2000). Due to this, he is considered as a citizen leader.

“Citizen Leaders generally do not select leadership” (Phillips, 2000). They do not even try to find it, and they are not provided with conventional types of appreciation. Martin Luther King Jr. showed motivational leadership; he encouraged the lives of a number of his adherents nationally. All through his leadership, King showed idealistic obligation to peacefulness, constantly attempting to enlighten young black individuals why they must abstain from self-protection in front of dangerous aggression by Klansmen in addition to “white vigilantes” (Phillips, 2000) who were usually in union with legal authorities.

References Coltman, L. (2005). The Real Fidel Castro. Yale University Press. King, M. L., and Carson, C. (2001). The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr. Grand Central Publishing. Phillips, D. T. (2000). Martin Luther Kin