Health promoting Services - Article Example

This paper will focus on a literature review of Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters’ article “Health Promoting Health Services: A Review of the Evidence”. Particular concentration of the literature review will be to highlight the strengths and weaknesses noted in the article and how the article has been organized. Strengths A close analysis of the article reveals that the author has vast knowledge in the field of Health Promoting Health Services. Ideas in the article have been presented logically through citation of several research works done by other writers and critics within the field.

There is a clear discussion of the author ideas with reference to other ideologies in this area of study. As such, Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters are organized in their presentation of the article for easy understanding of principles in health promoting health by the readers. In the first place, the structure of the article is well defined since headings have bee utilized well in bold to draw the readers’ attention to imperative points in health promoting health. The introduction particularly has given a summary of what is talked about in the entire article.

Similarly, the last paragraph draws emphasis to important points and terms applicable in health promoting health. . This implies that for a successful dissertation, a wide range of secondary sources are significant in acquiring different views of writers on a subject of discussion. Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters continue displaying their writing savvy in their literature review by ensuring each of his peers’ works are cited in the correct APA format. When they paraphrase, they identify the sources appropriately.

When they make direct quotes, they use parentheses as well as table to identify the source of information for clarity. As researchers, Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters ensure their literature review contains a balanced mix of other researchers’ work and their work. Research done in the article indicated that it is very painful to read any researcher’s work that contained a literature review that only had other researcher’s words. Further, it is cumbersome to read all of these quotes and paraphrases without an author’s original thought in the literature review.

Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters have reduced these conflicts through a well review of their ideas and other authors’ thoughts. Lastly, Mchugh, Robinson, & Chesters take complex figures and simplify it with one of their own. Weaknesses Apart from strengths seen in the article, there are some elements lacking which would have made the literature review more appealing to the reader. The authors failed in the methodology section in which chances of bias are prevalent. Overemphasis was put on secondary sources instead of carrying out their personal research to collect primary information.

This would have offered an opportunity to compare some of the down falls in the previous research done in the same field. Another writing weakness was the authors’ misuse