We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Forced ranking and motivation - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Forced Ranking and Motivation Name Institution Forced Ranking and Motivation The main aim of any organization is to accomplish its strategic objectives within the stipulated time of work hours. For this to happen, a work plan is structured and agreed upon on how to commence, work according to plan and monitor the results…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Polish This Essay98.7% of users find it useful
Forced ranking and motivation
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Forced ranking and motivation"

Download file to see previous pages It is usually done by use of periodical interviews conducted by managers or filling out questionnaires by supervisors and/or fellow subordinates. The results are afterwards analyzed and assessed (Spector, 2008). It is paramount to understand what forced ranking is with regard to performance appraisal before an individual gives an own opinion on whether it succeeds in motivation employees or not. Forced ranking is a contentious management tool that is used as an intervention of performance of organization’s employees. It is uses what statisticians refer to as a normal distribution curve to rank the employees from the highest performing to the poor performers in a given period of time. This is done after a series of periodical assessments of results using person-to-person comparisons. The premise behind this management tool is that in order for an organization to achieve its goals, they must categorize their best and worst performers. At this point, the management is left with employees at both extremes (Scullen, Bergey & Aiman-Smith, 2005). The next phase entails nurturing the best and rehabilitating or discarding the poor performers. In my opinion, forced ranking does not serve to improve results for any organization and does not motivate employees. To start with, whenever forced ranking results are completed, the majority of the employees fall at the mediocre level of the curve. Therefore, they feel comfortable that their jobs are still secure. This would lead to constant workers input that only saves them from being ranked as the poorest in an organization. In addition, the forced ranking does not portray the real picture of quality in any employee’s effort. When we consider motivation, forced ranking may sabotage the performance of highly rated employees. This is because, in any given appraisal activity, the method produces a normal curve irrespective of the performances staged by the employees (Pinder, 2008). In this case, an employee may have performed to the expected levels and capacity. These employees would expect to be recognized as having worked within their capacity thus providing exceptionally good results. However, they would still be ranked as a poor performer simply because some other employees have slightly better performances. According to the expectancy theory, the anticipation of the employee would affect his or her motivation towards work if the forced ranking places this kind of an employee at the poor performers’ level. The result would be a discouraged employee whose expectations of a reward do not come to be (Schultz & Nembhard, 2006). The obvious reaction after such an appraisal would lead to the employees comparing their respective performances. The poorly ranked employees would feel that the appraisal results were unfair whenever the perception of equal performances is imminent. According to the equity theory, the negative perception to unfairness would affect the employee’s compliance to perform to their capacity. Furthermore, some employees who are ranked higher would compare their rewards to others of similar positions (Spector, 2008). If such employees think that they have been under-rewarded, they may end up underperforming in the subsequent years. Therefore, this method of appraisal does not motivate employees. As mentioned above, the premise of the equity theory is based on the perception of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Forced ranking and motivation Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1396637-case-study
(Forced Ranking and Motivation Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/management/1396637-case-study.
“Forced Ranking and Motivation Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1396637-case-study.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Work motivation
Work Motivation Name University Introduction Norsk Petroleum is an organization with its main headquarters in Oslo, Norway. This organization deals with gas and oil exploration. Over the recent past, many experts in this organization have been resigning and joining competitors in the industry.
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Motivation and Reward
(Vroom, 1994 p.11) Thus in order to understand the human behavior completely, the motivational process must be analyzed. Organizations employ large number of executives on various jobs that have relatively limited scope of responsibility, require little initiative or decision-making and provide little feed-back about results and also yield a little sense of achievement or satisfaction.
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study
Motivation and Pay
The yearly costs of low morale and absenteeism in the United States are estimated to be $29 billion and a change of 4.99% in the national absence rate changes the gross national product by $10 billion. (London, 2003) A great number of studies are done to identify the determinants of low morale and absenteeism.
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study
Siebel Forced-Ranking System
The system can create a more productive workforce where top-talent is appreciated, rewarded and retained. It is a solution to problems related to a manager's inflated rating of an employee which results when a manager feels that a lower rating would be unkind or de-motivational.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Workplace Motivation
It is also clear that his motivation is affected by attitudes and actions of his own. It is the continuing interplay of the motivating environment, which is largely a matter of how an enterprise is managed, with the personal motivations of the individual that produces his long-term motivational trends as well as his momentary ups and downs.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
Team motivation
Also, this means increase in waiting time for the customers to get their queries answered. She wants me to analyse whether Theory Y can be applied, what are the motivation issues related to it and offer recommendations that will better the situation. In the simplest terms, motivation is defined as the reason people do what they do.
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
Motivation Assignment
If employee expects productive and desirable result, they will habitually perform hard according to the expectation of organization. Motivation of
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
A question of motivation
Next will be analysis of the problem. In order to engage conclusive analysis, the paper will make use of the various theories of organizational behaviors. Employee motivation is one of the greatest assets that direct and lead the growth of a company or industry.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
Employee motivation
The article Employee Motivation by Nohria, Groysberg and Lee (2008) is a projection of the authors’ opinion with regards to organizational performance. The authors’ intention in the article is to provide clarity on human effort within straining work environments.
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
Seminar issues in hospital
Secondly, it is essential to recognize and reward exemplary employees. Without rewards and incentives, hardworking employees naturally lose motivation. Thirdly, it is beneficial to involve the workforce in decision-making processes. This makes them feel like a team and
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Forced ranking and motivation for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us