The project seeks to explain two behavioral theories of leadership in this context. In this context the various theories proposed by Kurt Lewin would be discussed. Besides explaining the theories elaborately, the project would apply them to me and my personality. …
Download file to see previous pages...
The intention of this study is a leadership as an effective tool for any person to establish the idea of an individual and apply the concept to a group of people. For the implementation process an individual needs to possess certain characteristics and qualities to motivate the others and change the behavior of the other person to accomplish the goal. Some of the greatest successes of individuals in the industry have been because of the leadership attributes they possessed and the way they used them to influence others. Thus leadership has been described as the process of social influence in which an individual uses the support and of others for the purpose of accomplishment of tasks. Apart from influencing the behavior of others, leadership plays the crucial role of integrating and utilizing available resources in the external and internal environment for the purpose of attainment of societal and organizational goals. The aim of making a behavioral analysis is to provide individuals with the awareness of his behavioral traits and styles. The awareness helps people understand why he reacts in a certain way in a particular situation and why others react in the way they do. Analysis of the various behavioral leadership styles through proposed by researchers and practitioners would help me understand my leadership traits better and the reasons how they have been accrued. The origin of the behavioral theories was primarily out of the shortcomings of trait theories which were criticized of being inconclusive and incomplete. Some of the attributes like integrity, honesty, diligence and loyalty were not measurable using trait theories and this has triggered the creation of the behavioral school of thought initiated by Douglas McGregor. The emphasis of the theories was primarily on human relationships along with performance and output (Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003, p.7). McGregor’s Theory X & Theory Y Managers McGregor’s X and Y theory is a simple and salutary reminder of the rules for managing people which are easily forgotten under the pressure of regular businesses. His theory provides some of the basic principles on which the management techniques and styles can be applied. According to his ideas, managers following the theory X generally end in poor results while the enlightened managers following theory Y end up getting better performance and results. Moreover, the enhanced performance also allows for the growth and development of individuals in the organizations (Schermerhorn, 2010, p.38). As per his views managers holding the assumptions of theory X generally believe that people working for them dislike work, lack ambitions, are resistant to change and generally prefer to be guided completely rather than to lead. His other argument is that managers following assumption Y are of the opinion that people are hard working, full of self control, accepts responsibilities, creative, imaginative and are capable to lead themselves properly (Schermerhorn, 2010, p.38). Resulting from his experience, McGregor presented a summary of the assumptions followed by managers in
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Leadership Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/management/1391298-leadership
(Leadership Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Leadership Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1391298-leadership.
Introduction Both primary and secondary search for a definition to leadership would result in many different definitions being put forward by different scholars and people, depending on the direction from which a person may be viewing leadership from. This is to say that there is no one clear-cut definition of who is leader is or what leadership is.
With time, other timelines gave rise to subsequent theories that analysts could use to determine leadership. They are level of skills and situational factors. These enabled analysts to elaborate on not only leadership theories and roles, but also distinguish between real time leaders and mere followers.
A good leader will be able to lead his team from planning to achieving, thereby reaching the organizational goals.
The "One Best way of Leadership" is a highly debated and exhaustively discussed topic. The jury is still out on deciding which exact style may work universally.
Leaders who understand the Servant style are more concerned with the need for leadership and the needs of their employees rather than their own ego. This paper will discuss Servant Leadership in comparison to other leadership style.
Organizations are changing so rapidly in this day and age that one can barely go to work and not expect some change.
This allows them to influence their followers extensively. A number of theories have been established to shade light on various approaches to leadership. Sheldon (2010) revealed that personal traits, values, principles, goals, skills
rait form of management is focused on the distinctiveness of several influential’s – both doing well and unproductive and is used to foresee management efficacy in many organizations found in the world. (Ackerman 1997). Therefore, successful leaders have the following traits
His great leadership skills and techniques is what led him to be a great leader even years after he left the presidency position. Some of these traits and characteristics which he had and which made him the great leader he was are discussed in detail below