Aggregational Role of Voting and Majority Rule - Essay Example

AGGREGATIONAL ROLE OF VOTING AND MAJORITY RULE College: The election process requires information of the community on the alternative sets than all other individuals. Elections are useful for creating collective decisions made with aggregate members of the parties involved in it. The concept of voting inspired models with mathematical explanations to the given systems involved in the elections (Tideman, N 2006). In most situations, voters identify with characteristic qualities of the options in the set to be selected, for example in voting for a school funding process, most of the participants agree the overall effect of good performance is useful in the students even when they may not generally agree on the amount of money to contribute by the individuals and collectively. Majority rule when addressing contrasting preferences often results as an arbitrary choice. This creates gives an advantage to democratic administrative policies in governance. Democratic Rule relates to the majority rule but has implications that could lead to instability; therefore, the democratic governance is useful when it undertakes the least( Nitzan, S.2010) . Democracy should restrain majority rule and not strengthen it. Assumptions about majority rule are that citizens’ vote in an effort to resolve conflicts based on preferences. The choice of majority rule is incapable of dealing with these conflicts (Emerson, 1994). The basic component facilitates priorities and increases the stability of performance by attending to matters of various subjects as required in the fields of elections. New administrations use power and influence to obtain special facilities within the institutions. These methods though variant in different countries are dependent on the vote of the selected committees that comprise of the people concerned with the topics in question whether education or other management and administration (Heckelman, J. C 2004).. The information required for decisions as these incorporates economic wisdom as well as collaboration and approval of the authorities involved in the process of voting with laid down provisions. The voting process is more efficient and of improved quality when the parties involved in the process are well informed on the material content of the funding process and the involvements in it. The voting parties after receiving all the quantity information required, use analysis of the process entirely, the comparisons and conclusions to persuade that the process is the best quality in the time line as well as the commodity line (Lipahart, A. 2008). UK voter turnout in the 2010 election The electorate vote on basis of information and rationality by the values and characters offered by the information available is considerably credible. In countries as the United Kingdom, the opinion of majority votes represents the quality opinion of the experts; it shows means to democracy. The reflective ideas and arguments of the majority considered a well-refined opinion that comes not just from a single mind but is higher ground to fine decisions that address the complexities of situations. The panel decisions are therefore a considerable depth of situation analysis and provide useful and effective management and administration for firms (Morgan, 1988). The voting electorate requires confidence from a selective search of the overall qualities of the contesting options in both excellence and the quality in the bulk. The advantage of numbers in a voting situation of aggregates is creating well-investigated analysis projects with detailed specifications approved by certain qualified experts of those fields such as financial and accounting documents that reflect the usage of funds in debates concerning the administration of the disciplines in question. When the electorate grows, the overall quality of decisions made in the systems of production improves in the short run with criticism and useful argument being part of the entire process. The processes become useful from obtained individual power driven to a workforce. The power and ability to persuade the public on the capability of the electorate to concede a purposeful solution including well-analysed data from the useful economic sources and their root creates form of leniency among the members of the electorate. The bodies involved in these decisions as voters get used to the norms of procedure and efficiency that they ignore the responsibilities with the assumption that fellow members concerned in the respective fields keep a hawk eye watch on the track. This is because in most situations, the voting committees selected from various groups linked to the subject of choice, for example, committees that involve members from various departments as representatives make organisational decisions. The members involved in developing the process of voting and making the final decision on the funding process of organizations behave strategically in aggregating information. The numbers improve the overall quality of decisions made concerning processes when effort is put into them to create the motivation required. Private concerns may as well arise in the event that motivation by other factors such as poor growth of technology applies since the value of the technology used among other factors is vital. The variables involved are factors of minute turnouts or major turnouts of the entire process conclusively (Szpiro, 2010). The production possibility curves represents the outputs of two commodities in the graph can be compared to the output of various forms of decision making processes and their efficiencies in the entire set up (Veblen et al 1934.) The commodities are taken to be the numbers of voters involved in a decision making process in numbers of human power and technology. X and y are relevant in providing an understanding of correlation of the aspects of aggregate decision-making process in the short run. The effect of the contribution presented in the production possibilities are various combinations of the two commodities that will later incorporate decision-making process by voting to build a final grounded system well supported administration and institution management (Chase et al 1934.) The various points A, B, C and D are useful in implying the different output conditions necessary for a process of efficient production to occur. Points A and B on the graph represent the available production possibilities while points C and D are the impossible production points that have been pushed and made impossible by certain situations as an underdeveloped voting system on the growth of production. An overpopulated value of the same will cause mismanagement leading to poor production since an overcrowding creates complications of lengthened decision-making processes, disagreements and confusion from complications that frustrate the production process (Von et al 1953.) Therefore, it is important that the voting process is liberated and the voters be selected to moderate the process while not being the most efficient there can be. The aspect of demand and supply on yet another note connotes the balance between goods provided by the suppliers and those demanded by the consumer. This creates the concept of a market that is the bigger picture after the production process. The idea to create useful decision-making process is therefore an extension into the market of knowledge and the opportunities to obtain better administration processes, content and others facilities. The equilibrium of the market is achieved when the supply levels in firm production are fully utilized by the maximum. The number of consumers brought in to exhaust the resources when they meet all their demands sufficiently. The entire system is therefore a series of dependence of one factor on the other until the final establishment of the market equilibrium is accomplished. The curve is a representation of multiple relationships between these factors and variables and represents dynamic relationships at the required points in time. Examples of Relationships between Economic Variables Most of the demand and supply provisions are however imbalanced from either too many people getting involved in the decision making process by vote. The demand becomes higher and the number of voters along with technology becomes an expense on firms than a way of increasing value The numbers and technology employed become useful in the long run when institutional operations have been established (Horge &Klima, 2005). The funding is also a government’s responsibility partially weighted upon the ministries concerned for the public sector and involves most of the ministry’s members in the decision-making processes. The role of each of the players is apparent in the circle of the economy in a recurrent manner. The effect of the economic theory in an effort to organize and aid in understanding our own activities in a structured manner through which we can plan and keep watch, address and analyse our own mechanisms. Bibliography. Hodge, J. K., & Klima, R. E. (2005). The mathematics of voting and elections: a hands-on approach. London: British Mathematical Society. Heckelman, J. C. (2004). Readings in public choice economics. Manchester: University of Manchester Press. Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about democracy: power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. London, Routledge Morgan, E. S. (1988). Inventing The People: The Rise Of Popular Sovereignty In England And America. London: Norton. Nitzan, S. (2010). Collective preference and choice. Yorkshire, University of York: Press. Tideman, N. (2006). Collective decisions and voting: the potential for public choice. Aldershot, England, Ashgate. Szpiro, G. (2010). Numbers Rule: The Vexing Mathematics Of Democracy, From Plato To The Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Emerson, P. J., & Emerson, P. J. (1994). The Politics Of Consensus: For The Resolution Of Conflict And Reform Of Majority Rule. Belfast: P.J. Emerson. Read More