This paper specifies six main macroeconomic objectives, commonly set by different government the world over. These objectives include; economic growth; control of inflation; reduction in joblessness; control of current account; better distribution of income; environmental conservation…
Download file to see previous pages...
This paper offer a comprehensive review of the relative effectiveness of the different tools of macroeconomic policy, adopted by a different country`s governments, in attaining main macroeconomic objectives. The various theories, that suggest priority in utilization of specific tool, often interrelate and are applied by governments primarily to achieve sustainable economic growth.
Generally, fiscal policy and monetary policy are used by the government to achieve the macroeconomic objectives. Whereas, fiscal policy is implemented by government through spending and taxation, monetary policy is essentially the responsibility of the central bank, through the controls of interest rates and the supply of currency. Both policies are implemented to reduce inflation rates and joblessness.
Whereas, each macroeconomic goals can have repercussions on economic factors if they spiral out of control, a number essentially have a more significant impact on citizens. High rate of joblessness not only translates into lost revenue for the government, but can signify a permanent reduction in an individual’s chances of securing employment through loss of expertise.
Low inflation rates is not a big issue, and as long as the citizens are in employment positions with adequate earnings; low rates of inflation will not result in any economic problem. Most people’s earnings, student endowment funds as well as pensions, are modified in line with commodity prices, and therefore, controlling inflation below the 2% level is not a major government concern.
(Kiefer 2000). Nonetheless, increases in inflation may reach a point where its side effects reduces international competitiveness, dampens the hope of foreign inward investors, and shifts redistribution of income from savers to borrowers to a point that it is harsh economic impacts turns out to be a key government concern (Nayyar 2011). Fig 2. Aggregate Expenditure According to Jin (2007), a current account shortfall on the balance of payments may be of less significance to government organizations, especially if the capital markets and the national currency are stable. Conversely, this may imply that an economy’s expenditures have stretched past its revenue collection, and at a given point the expenditure will have to be countered by substantial inflows. The United Kingdom, for instance, has massive foreign investments with substantial revenue potential, which may imply the shortfall will be checked if the economic condition is left to take its own course (Fig 2). According to Kiefer (2008), whereas, governments should not attempt to correct current account shortfalls with demand management practices: policies leaning toward supply have shown better results in regard to the restoration of permanent competitiveness of the economy. According to Froud, Moran, Nilsson and Williams (2010), the most controversial of government objectives is the policy of imposing more taxes on the higher-end population and handing it to the lower-end, in order to bridge the gap between the two economic segments. Kiefer (2000), point out that redistributing revenue from the moneyed to the poor via
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Macroeconomics Objectives of Governments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1455684-re-assessment
(Macroeconomics Objectives of Governments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Macroeconomics Objectives of Governments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1455684-re-assessment.
This paper will specifically discuss merits and demerits of both fixed and floating exchange rate regimes. According to the paper the most notable advantage of fixed exchange rate is that this condition avoids currency fluctuations and related currency losses. Hence, fixed exchange rate would assist an organisation to get rid of the troubles associated with unexpected global financial market fluctuations.
The field of economics is divided into two different areas: Micro-economics and Macro-economics. Microeconomics is concerned with the fundamentals such as the supply and demand theories and it determines how individuals choose different commodities to produce and the process by which they price it.
The fourth section will explain the redistribution of income and wealth narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor in the United Kingdom. Lastly, the essay will look into regional policies within the United Kingdom that encourage companies to set up factories or business establishment in low socio-economic areas in a bid to boost the quality of life in such areas.
Macroeconomic Policy Objectives. All governments have aims and targets for their respective economies. These are referent to the aims and goals of the policy pursued by the government, which differ from macroeconomic instruments. They are the means for governments to achieve these macroeconomic aims.
explaining crowding-out using either the IS-LM or the Philips’s curve and to show how it affects the economy as it is used as a tool for achieving economic objectives of monetary and fiscal authorities. To achieve this objective, the IS/LM model will be employed to see how
al. 2007). The Keynesian macrotheory was based on the premise that it is possible and desirable to control the levels of aggregate demand and unemployment. The monetarists believed that it is not necessary for
The actual or realized expenditure is the amount households, firms and government spend on goods and services, i.e. GDP (Y), while planned expenditure (E) is the amount they would like to spend on the same goods and services. Now the three major determinants
On the other hand South Korea recorded the most impressive growth in its livings standards since 1960 because it posted a growth of 1304.5%, while the United States posted a growth of 166.2% since 1960.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Macroeconomics Objectives of Governments for FREE!