What Is the most important for American Foreign Policy - Essay Example

It is worthwhile to highlight the fact that nations worldwide largely depend upon the USA for trade and commerce because of its economic strength. Indeed, the USA is the largest consuming nation (oil, textiles, minerals, machinery, etc.); therefore, all nations have the inclination to strengthen their ties and relationships with the United States as any uncertainty across the US sends shock waves across the globe. For instance, US currency is also used as the mode of payments in international markets, which also not only enhances its economic power but also the dependence of other countries worldwide.

In the light of the above-mentioned facts and ground realities, I would like to argue that the government authorities of the United States are also inclined to enhance their ties with the external world (including North American, Asian, European, Australian, and African nations) so that they could ensure peace worldwide. In simple words, I would be focusing on two main terminologies – Internal and External Peace – that are actually most important for America’s growth and well-being because they influence the formulation and implementation of U.S. foreign policy.

Internal Peace, in this context, refers to peace and harmony within America as this leads to greater welfare, development, and well-being of the society. Indeed, the grappling with the adversaries, rebellions, and terrorists that could possibly harm U.S. interests and underlying agenda within and outside the USA is nothing but the attempt of assuring peace and security within the USA. For instance, the major focus of policymakers is to eradicate such internal and external groups that would directly impact the national interests of the USA as well as create a sense of insecurity among US citizens. For this purpose, the USA has been fighting with militants (groups and individuals) that challenge U.S. supremacy and sovereignty by threatening explicitly about their nefarious desires and evil intentions. This is exactly the case of Afghanistan, Iraq, Cuba, and North Korea that openly challenge the US government and blame it for plotting gruesome ventures outside America (Perl, 2003).

It should also be pointed out that the US forces, on instructions of the government, have been fighting Al-Qaeda militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan so that it could either completely eradicate extremists groups/individuals or, at least could destroy their organized networks. However, so far, the USA is failed to control in entirety Al-Qaeda and Taliban in Iraq and Afghanistan respectively, yet the forces have had some success against these grisly militant networks/outfits according to various independent sources. The law and order situation has also been aggravated in the aforementioned nations. Hence, the USA is today more inclined to end these wars by handing over the control to well-trained local forces so that it could facilitate peace-making in these two war-hit nations.

As far as the external peace efforts are concerned, the USA is not in a state of war with Iran and North Korea; however, it has raised the issue of nefarious designs of these mentioned nations regarding access to nuclear weapons either through production or smuggling from Pakistan. In this way, the USA has taken initiatives in the form of sanctions to prevent the horizontal proliferation that could bring this world to the verge of collapse. Also, the USA has reached a consensus with Russia to destroy excessive nuclear and some mass destruction weapons in order to reduce the probability of an arms race. For instance, the USA has been opting towards the promotion of peace and security in Palestine and Israel because the issue indulges other Middle Eastern nations as well. Indeed, the USA does not want to remake of wars of 1967 and 1973 in the region; hence, it has been playing its role for negotiations and consequently a consensus for permanent resolution of this grave issue, also known as a bone of contention in the Middle East (The White House, 2010). Read More